Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-17T16:02:16.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimation and testing of forecast rationality with many moments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2025

Tae-Hwy Lee  and
Tao Wang
Tae-Hwy Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
Tao Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Department of Mathematics and Statistics (by courtesy), University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Tao Wang; Email: taow@uvic.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We in this paper employ a penalized moment selection procedure to identify valid and relevant moments for estimating and testing forecast rationality within the flexible loss framework proposed by Elliott et al. (2005). We motivate the selection of moments in a high-dimensional setting, outlining the fundamental mechanism of the penalized moment selection procedure and demonstrating its implementation in the context of forecast rationality, particularly in the presence of potentially invalid moment conditions. The selection consistency and asymptotic normality are established under conditions specifically tailored to economic forecasting. Through a series of Monte Carlo simulations, we evaluate the finite sample performance of penalized moment estimation in utilizing available instrument information effectively within both estimation and testing procedures. Additionally, we present an empirical analysis using data from the Survey of Professional Forecasters issued by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia to illustrate the practical utility of the suggested methodology. The results indicate that the proposed post-selection estimator for forecaster’s attitude performs comparably to the oracle estimator by efficiently incorporating available information. The power of rationality and symmetry tests leveraging penalized moment estimation is substantially enhanced by minimizing the impact of uninformative instruments. For practitioners assessing the rationality of externally generated forecasts, such as those in the Greenbook, the proposed penalized moment selection procedure could offer a robust approach to achieve more efficient estimation outcomes.

Keywords

Forecast rationalitymoment selectionpenalized estimationrelevancevalidityC36C53E17

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 29 , 2025 , e124
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andrews, D.W.K. (1999). Consistent moment selection procedures for generalized method of moments estimation. Econometrica 67(3), 543–563.10.1111/1468-0262.00036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D.W.K. (2002). Higher-order improvements of a computationally attractive $k$ -step bootstrap for extremum estimatiors. Econometrica 70(1), 119–162.10.1111/1468-0262.00271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D.W.K. and Lu, B.. (2001). Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 101(1), 123–164.10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00077-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barendse, S. and Patton, A.J.. (2022). Comparing predictive accuracy in the presence of a loss function shape parameter. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 40(3), 1057–1069.10.1080/07350015.2021.1896527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Hansen, C. and Kato, K.. (2018). High-Dimensional Econometrics and Regularized GMM. arXiv: arXiv: 1806.01888 Google Scholar
Binder, C.C. and Sekkel, R.. (2024). Central bank forecasting: a survey. Journal of Economic Surveys 38(2), 342–364.10.1111/joes.12554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caner, M., Han, X. and Lee, Y.. (2018). Adaptive elastic net GMM estimation with many invalid moment conditions: simultaneous model and moment selection. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 36(1), 24–46.10.1080/07350015.2015.1129344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capistran, C. and Timmermann, A.. (2009). Disagreement and biases in inflation expectation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 41(2–3), 365–396.10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00209.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carabotta, L. and Claeys, P.. (2024). Combine to compete: improving fiscal forecast accuracy over time. Journal of Forecasting 43(4), 948–982.10.1002/for.3058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, C.D. (2003). Macroeconomic expectations of households and professional forecasters. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1), 269–298.10.1162/00335530360535207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, X. and Liao, Z.. (2015). Select the valid and relevant moments: an information-based LASSO for GMM with many moments. Journal of Econometrics 186(2), 443–464.10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.02.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffersen, P.F. (1998). Evaluating interval forecasts. International Economic Review 39(4), 841–862.10.2307/2527341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffersen, P.F. and Diebold, F.X.. (1997). Optimal prediction under asymmetric loss. Econometric Theory 13(6), 808–817.10.1017/S0266466600006277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croushore, D. and Stark, T.. (2001). A real-time data set for macroeconomists. Journal of Econometrics 105(1), 111–130.10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00072-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetrescu, M., Hanck, C. and Kruse-Becher, R.. (2022). Robust inference under time-varying volatility: a real-time evaluation of professional forecasters. Journal of Applied Econometrics 37(5), 1010–1030.10.1002/jae.2906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitriadis, T., Patton, A.J. and Schmidt, P.. (2024). Testing forecast rationality for measures of central tendency. Review of Economics and Statistics forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01535. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, S.G. and Newey, W.K.. (2001). Choosing the number of instruments. Econometrica 69(5), 1161–1192.10.1111/1468-0262.00238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G. and Timmermann, A.. (2008). Economic forecasting. Journal of Economic Literature 46(1), 3–56.10.1257/jel.46.1.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G. and Timmermann, A.. (2016). Economic Forecasting. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, G., Komunjer, I. and Timmermann, A.. (2005). Estimation and testing of forecast rationality under flexible loss. Review of Economic Studies 72(4), 1107–1125.10.1111/0034-6527.00363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G., Komunjer, I. and Timmermann, A.. (2008). Biases in macroeconomic forecasts: irrationality or asymmetric loss? Journal of the European Economic Association 6(1), 122–157.10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.1.122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T.J. and Stock, J.H.. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64(4), 813–836.10.2307/2171846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghysels, E. and Wright, J.H.. (2009). Forecasting professional forecasters. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 27(4), 504–516.10.1198/jbes.2009.06044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, D., Lederer, J. and Tao, J.. (2020). Inference for high-dimensional instrumental variables regression. Journal of Econometrics 217(1), 79–111.10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A.R. (2005). Generalized method of moments. In Advanced Texts in Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, A.R., Inoue, A., Jana, K. and Shin, C.. (2007). Information in generalized method of moments estimation and entropy based moment selection. Journal of Econometrics 138(2), 488–512.10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L.P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50(4), 1029–1054.10.2307/1912775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, H., Preston, B. and Shum, M.. (2003). Generalized empirical likelihood-based model selection criteria for moment condition models. Econometric Theory 19(6), 923–943.10.1017/S0266466603196028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilek, A. (2016). A note on the rationality test. Macroeconomic Dynamics 21(8), 2121–2137.10.1017/S1365100515001108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, A. (2006). A bootstrap approach to moment selection. The Econometrics Journal 9(1), 48–75.10.1111/j.1368-423X.2006.00176.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, M.P. and Runkle, D.E.. (1990). Testing the rationality of price forecasts: new evidence from panel data. American Economic Review 80(4), 714–735.Google Scholar
Kilian, L. and Manganelli, S.. (2008). The central banker as a risk manager: estimating the federal reserve’s preferences under greenspan. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40(6), 1103–1129.10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00150.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komunjer, I. and Owyang, M.T.. (2012). Multivariate forecast evaluation and rationality testing. Review of Economics and Statistics 94(4), 1066–1080.10.1162/REST_a_00215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, T.L., Small, D. and Liu, J.. (2010). A two-stage model and moment selection criterion for moment restriction models, Available at https://tzelai.ckirby.su.domains/pubs/2010_TwoStage.pdf.Google Scholar
Liao, Z. (2013). Adaptive GMM shrinkage estimation with consistent moment selection. Econometric Theory 29(5), 1–48.10.1017/S0266466612000783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y. (2015). High-Dimensional Econometrics and Model Selection. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Ng, S. and Bai, J.. (2009). Selecting instrumental variables in a data rich environment. Journal of Time Series Econometrics 1(1), Article 4.10.2202/1941-1928.1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, A.J. (2020). Comparing possibly misspecified forecasts. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 38(4), 796–809.10.1080/07350015.2019.1585256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, A.J. and Timmermann, A.. (2007). Testing forecast Optimality under unknown loss. Journal of the American Statistical Association 102(480), 1172–1184.10.1198/016214506000001176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, A.J. and Timmermann, A.. (2010). Why do forecasts disagree? Lessons from the term structure of cross-sectional dispersion. Journal of Monetary Economics 57(7), 803–820.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, A.J. and Timmermann, A.. (2012). Forecasting rationality tests based on multi-horizon bounds. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 30(1), 1–17.10.1080/07350015.2012.634337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qu, R., Timmermann, A. and Zhu, Y.. (2024). Comparing forecasting performance with panel data. International Journal of Forecasting 40(3), 918–941.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2023.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, B. and Sekhposyan, T.. (2016). Forecast rationality tests in the presence of instabilities, with applications to federal reserve and survey forecasts. Journal of Applied Econometrics 31(3), 507–532.10.1002/jae.2440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, P., Katzfuss, M. and Gneiting, T.. (2021). Interpretation of point forecasts with unknown directive. Journal of Applied Econometrics 36(6), 728–743.10.1002/jae.2833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. and Lee, T.-H.. (2014). Asymmetric loss in the Greenbook and survey of professional forecasters. International Journal of Forecasting 30(2), 235–245.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2013.07.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar