Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-jb2ch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-28T15:25:52.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on variable markup, knowledge spillover, and multiple steady states in the variety expansion model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2023

Tadashi Morita*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics, Kindai University, Higashiosaka, Japan

Abstract

This paper incorporates the variable elasticity of substitution preferences in the variety expansion model developed by Grossman and Helpman [(1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press]. There exists a balanced growth path when the elasticity of substitution is constant with knowledge spillover. When the elasticity of substitution is variable and the knowledge spillover is sufficiently small, a unique and stable steady state exists. When the knowledge spillover is sufficiently large, the steady state is unique and unstable. When the size of the knowledge externality is moderate, multiple equilibria exist.

Type
Notes
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to express sincere gratitude to an associate editor, an anonymous referee, Koichi Futagami, Juan Carlos Lopez, and Katsunori Yamada for their helpful comments. This work was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 20H01506, 21K01453, and 22K01436.

References

Acemoglu, D. (2008) Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Behrens, K. and Murata, Y. (2007) General equilibrium models of monopolistic competition: A new approach. Journal of Economic Theory 136(1), 776787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoletti, P. and Etro, F. (2016) Preferences, entry and market structure. Rand Journal of Economics 47(4), 792821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoletti, P. and Etro, F. (2017) Monopolistic competition when income matters. Economic Journal 127(603), 12171243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoletti, P. and Etro, F. (2021) Monopolistic competition with generalized additively separable preferences. Oxford Economic Papers 73(2), 927952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoletti, P. and Etro, F. (2022) Monopolistic competition, as you like it. Economic Inquiry 60(1), 293319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilbiie, F., Ghironi, F. and Melitz, M.. (2012) Endogenous entry, product variety, and business cycle. Journal of Political Economy 120(2), 304345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilbiie, F., Ghironi, F. and Melitz, M.. (2019) Monopoly power and endogenous variety: Distortions and remedies. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 11(4), 140174.Google Scholar
Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J. and Webb, M.. (2020) Are ideas getting harder to find? American Economic Review 110(4), 11041144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucekkine, R., Latzer, H. and Parenti, M.. (2017) Variable markups in the long-run: A generalization of preferences in growth models. Journal of Mathematical Economics 68, 8086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Loecker, J., Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K. and Pavcnik, N.. (2012). Prices, Markups and Trade Reform. Technical report, NBER, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Loecker, J. and Warzynski, F. (2012) Markups and firm-level export status. American Economic Review 102(6), 24372471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhingra, S. and Morrow, J. (2019) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity under firm heterogeneity. Journal of Political Economy 127(1), 196231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhyne, E., Petrin, A. and Warzynski, F.. (2011). Prices, Markups and Quality at the Firm-Product Level. Technical report, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. K. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1977) Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. American Economic Review 67(3), 297308.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haltiwanger, J. (2012) Job creation and firm dynamics in the United States. Innovation Policy and the Economy 12(1), 1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. I. (2022) The end of economic growth? Unintended consequences of a declining population. American Economic Review 112(11), 34893527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1961) Capital accumulation and economic growth. In: Kaldor, N. (eds.), The Theory of Capital, pp. 177222. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, M. (1995) The quantitative analytics of the basic neomonetarist model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27(4), 12411277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latzer, H., Matsuyama, K. and Parenti, M.. (2019). Reconsidering the Market Size Effect in Innovation and Growth. CEPR Discussion Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neves, P. C. and Sequeira, T. N. (2018) Spillovers in the production of knowledge: A meta-regression analysis. Research Policy 47(4), 750767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smets, F. and Wouters, R. (2007) Shocks and frictions in US business cycles: A Bayesian DSGE approach. American Economic Review 97(3), 586606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhelobodko, E., Kokovin, S., Parenti, M. and Thisse, J. F.. (2012) Monopolistic competition: Beyond the constant elasticity of substitution. Econometrica 80(6), 27652784.Google Scholar