Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:59:49.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AGING, THE GREAT MODERATION, AND BUSINESS-CYCLE VOLATILITY IN A LIFE-CYCLE MODEL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2016

Burkhard Heer ,
Stefan Rohrbacher  and
Christian Scharrer
Burkhard Heer*
Affiliation:
University of Augsburg and CESifo
Stefan Rohrbacher
Affiliation:
University of Augsburg
Christian Scharrer
Affiliation:
University of Augsburg
*
Address correspondence to: Burkhard Heer, Department of Economics, University of Augsburg, Universitatsstrasse 16, 86159 Augsburg, Germany; e-mail: burkhard.heer@wiwi.uni-augsburg.de.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to empirical studies, the life cycle of labor supply volatility exhibits a U-shaped pattern. This may lead to the conclusion that demographic change induces a drop in output volatility. We present an overlapping-generations model that replicates the empirically observed pattern and study the impact of demographic transition on output volatility. We find that the change in age composition itself has only a marginal influence on output volatility, as the mitigating effect of more individuals with lower labor supply volatilities is compensated for by higher age-specific labor shares. Instead, the driving force behind the Great Moderation in our model is the downward shift of the age-specific labor supply volatility curve.

Keywords

Business CyclesOverlapping GenerationsDemographics
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 362 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments, which greatly contributed to improving the final version of the paper. Moreover, we would also like to thank Johann Scharler (University of Innsbruck) for his extensive discussions with us and for his helpful comments. Stefan Rohrbacher and Christian Scharrer thank the Research Center Global Business Management at the University of Augsburg for financial support. All remaining errors are ours.

References

REFERENCES

Clarida, R., Gali, J., and Gertler, M. (2000) Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and some theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (1), 147–180.Google Scholar
Clark, K. and Summers, L. (1981) Demographic differences in cyclical employment variation. Journal of Human Resources 16 (1), 61–79.Google Scholar
Davis, S.J. and Kahn, J.A. (2008) Interpreting the Great Moderation: Changes in the volatility of economic activity at the macro and micro levels. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (4), 155–180.Google Scholar
Dynan, K.E., Elmendorf, D.W., and Sichel, D.E. (2006) Can financial innovation help to explain the reduced volatility of economic activity? Journal of Monetary Economics 53 (1), 123–150.Google Scholar
Giordani, P. and Söderlind, P. (2004) Solution of macromodels with Hansen–Sargent robust policies: Some extensions. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 28 (12), 2367–2397.Google Scholar
Gomme, P., Rogerson, R., Rupert, P., and Wright, R. (2005) The business cycle and the life cycle. In Gertler, M. and Rogoff, K. (eds.), National Bureau of Economic Research Macroeconomics Annual 19, pp. 415–446. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenwood, J., Hercovitz, Z., and Huffman, G.W. (1988) Investment, capacity utilization, and the real business cycle. American Economic Review 78 (3), 402–417.Google Scholar
Hansen, G.D. (1993) The cyclical and secular behaviour of the labor input: Comparing efficiency units and hours worked. Journal of Applied Econometrics 8 (1), 71–80.Google Scholar
Heer, B. and Maussner, A. (2009) Dynamic General Equilibrium Models: Computational Methods and Applications, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heer, B., Rohrbacher, S., and Scharrer, C. (2014) Aging, the Great Moderation, and Business-Cycle Volatility in a Life-Cycle Model. CESifo working paper 4584.Google Scholar
Hansen, G. D. and Imrohoroğlu, S. (2009) Business cycle fluctuations and the life cycle: How important is on-the-job-skill accumulation? Journal of Economic Theory 144 (6), 2293–2309.Google Scholar
Jaimovich, N., Pruitt, S., and Siu, H.E. (2013) The demand for youth: Explaining age differences in the volatility of hours. American Economic Review 103 (7), 3022–3044.Google Scholar
Jaimovich, N. and Siu, H.E. (2009) The young, the old, and the restless: Demographics and business cycle volatility. American Economic Review 99 (3), 804–826.Google Scholar
Keane, M. (2011) Labor supply and taxes: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 49 (4), 961–1075.Google Scholar
Keane, M. and Rogerson, R. (2012) Micro and macro labor supply elasticities: A reassessment of conventional wisdom. Journal of Economic Literature 50 (2), 464–476.Google Scholar
Kimball, M.S. and Shapiro, M.D. (2008) Labor Supply: Are the Income and Substitution Effects Both Large or Both Small? Working paper 14208, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Krueger, D. and Ludwig, A. (2007) On the consequences of demographic change for rates of returns to capital, and the distribution of wealth and welfare. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 49–87.Google Scholar
Lugauer, S. (2012a) Demographic change and the great moderation in an overlapping generations model with matching frictions. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16 (5), 706–731.Google Scholar
Lugauer, S. (2012b) Estimating the effect of the age distribution on cyclical output volatility across the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics 94 (4), 896–902.Google Scholar
Lugauer, S. and Redmond, M. (2012) The age distribution and business cycle volatility: International evidence. Economics Letters 117 (3), 694–696.Google Scholar
Peterman, W. (2012) Reconciling Micro and Macro Estimates of the Frisch Labor Supply Elasticity. Finance and economics discussion series 2012-2075, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).Google Scholar
Prescott, E.C. (1986) Theory ahead of business cycle measurement. Carnegie Rochester Series on Public Policy 25, 11–44.Google Scholar
Ríos-Rull, J.-V. (1996) Life-cycle economies and aggregate fluctuations. Review of Economic Studies 63 (3), 465–489.Google Scholar
Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W. (2003) Has the business cycle changed and why? In Gertler, M. and Rogoff, K. (eds.), National Bureau of Economic Research Macroeconomics Annual 2002, Vol. 17, pp. 159–230. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trabandt, M. and Uhlig, H. (2011) The Laffer curve revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics 58, 305–327.Google Scholar
United Nations (2002) World Population Prospects: The 2002 Revision. New York: United Nations Population Division, United Nations.Google Scholar