Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa


  • Nathan S. Balke (a1), Jun Ma (a2) and Mark E. Wohar (a3)

This paper employs the state-space model to reexamine the fundamental issue in finance of whether it is the expected returns or the expected dividends growth that is primarily responsible for stock price variations. We use Bayesian methods to show that there is a substantial uncertainty about the contributions of expected returns and expected dividends to fluctuations in the price–dividend ratio when the aggregate returns and dividends data are used. The substantial uncertainty of the contributions results from the model being weakly identified. Our finding challenges the notion long held in the existing literature that it is the expected returns that contribute most to price–dividend variations.

Corresponding author
Address correspondence to: Jun Ma, Department of Economics, Finance and Legal Studies, Culverhouse College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0024, USA; e-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Nathan S. Balke and Mark E. Wohar (2002) Low frequency movements in stock prices: A state-space decomposition. Review of Economics and Statistics 84, 649667.

Nathan S. Balke and Mark E. Wohar (2009) Market fundamentals versus rational bubbles in stock prices: A Bayesian perspective. Journal of Applied Econometrics 24, 3575.

Ravi Bansal and Amir Yaron (2004) Risks for the long-run: A potential resolution of the asset pricing puzzles. Journal of Finance 59, 14811509.

Jules H. van Binsbergen and Ralph S.J. Koijen (2010) Predictive regressions: A present-value approach. Journal of Finance 65, 14391471.

Jeffrey L. Callen and Dan Segal (2004) Do accruals drive firm-level stock returns? A variance decomposition analysis. Journal of Accounting Research 43, 377412.

John Y. Campbell (1991) A variance decomposition for stock returns. Economic Journal 101, 157179.

John Y. Campbell and John Ammer (1993) What moves the stock and bond markets? A variance decomposition for long-term asset returns. Journal of Finance 48, 337.

John Y. Campbell and J.H. Cochrane (1999) By force of habit: A consumption-based aggregate explanation of stock market behavior. Journal of Political Economy 107, 205251.

John Y. Campbell and Robert Shiller (1988a) The dividend-price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors. Review of Financial Studies 1, 195228.

John Y. Campbell and Robert Shiller (1988b) Stock prices, earnings, and expected dividends. Journal of Finance 43, 661676.

Christopher K. Carter and Robert Kohn (1994) On Gibbs sampling for state-space models. Biometrika 81, 541553.

Long Chen (2009) On the reversal of return and dividend growth predictability: A tale of two periods. Journal of Financial Economics 92, 128151.

Long Chen , Zhi Da , and Xinlei Zhao (2013) What drives stock price movements? Review of Financial Studies 26, 841876.

Long Chen and Xinlei Zhao (2009) Return decomposition. Review of Financial Studies 22, 52135249.

John Cochrane (1992) Explaining the variance of price-dividend ratios. Review of Financial Studies 5, 243280.

John Cochrane (2008) The dog that did not bark: A defense of return predictability. Review of Financial Studies 21, 15331575.

Keith Cuthbertson , Simon Haves , and Dirk Nitzsche (1999) Explaining movements in UK stock prices. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 39, 119.

Lars P. Hansen , John C. Heaton , and Nan Li (2008) Consumption strikes back? Measuring long-run risk. Journal of Political Economy 116, 260302.

Borja Larrain and Motohiro Yogo (2008) Does firm value move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in cash flow? Journal of Financial Economics 87, 200226.

Jun Ma (2013) Long-run risks and its implications for the equity premium puzzle: New evidence from a multivariate framework. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 45, 121145.

Jun Ma , Charles R. Nelson , and Richard Startz (2007) Spurious inference in the GARCH(1,1) model when it is weakly identified. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 11, 127.

James Morley , Charles R. Nelson , and Eric Zivot (2003) Why are unobserved component and Beveridge-Nelson trend-cycle decompositions of GDP so different? Review of Economics and Statistics 85, 235243.

Charles R. Nelson and Myung J. Kim (1993) Predictable stock returns: The role of small sample bias. Journal of Finance 48, 641661.

Charles R. Nelson and Richard Startz (2007) The zero-information-limit condition and spurious inference in weakly identified models. Journal of Econometrics 138, 4762.

Robert Shiller and Andrea Beltratti (1992) Stock prices and bond yields. Journal of Monetary Economics 30, 2546.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Macroeconomic Dynamics
  • ISSN: 1365-1005
  • EISSN: 1469-8056
  • URL: /core/journals/macroeconomic-dynamics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 20 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 187 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.