Skip to main content
×
Home

A COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL METHODS FOR THE SOLUTION OF CONTINUOUS-TIME DSGE MODELS

  • Juan Carlos Parra-Alvarez (a1)
Abstract

This study evaluates the accuracy of a set of techniques that approximate the solution of continuous-time Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium models. Using the neoclassical growth model, I compare linear-quadratic, perturbation, and projection methods. All techniques are applied to the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation and the optimality conditions that define the general equilibrium of the economy. Two cases are studied depending on whether a closed-form solution is available. I also analyze how different degrees of non-linearities affect the approximated solution. The results encourage the use of perturbations for reasonable values of the structural parameters of the model and suggest the use of projection methods when a high degree of accuracy is required.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence to: Juan Carlos Parra-Alvarez, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Fuglesangs Allé 4, 8210 Aarhus V, Denmark; e-mail: jparra@econ.au.dk.
Footnotes
Hide All

I would like to thank the editor and two anonymous referees for extremely useful comments and suggestions, as well as the participants of the 18th Annual Conference on Computing in Economics and Finance in Prague, the 6th CSDA International Conference on Computational and Financial Econometrics in Oviedo and the CDMA Workshop on DSGE models in St. Andrews for their helpful comments. I would also like to thank Olaf Posch, Bent Jesper Christensen, Jesús Fernández-Villaverde, Kenneth Judd, Martin Møller Andreasen, Willi Semmler and seminar participants at CREATES for useful suggestions and insights. CREATES (Center for Research in Econometric Analysis of Time Series) is funded by the Danish National Research Foundation.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Achdou Y., Buera F.J., Lasry J.M., Lions P.L., and Moll B. (2014) Partial differential equation models in macroeconomics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 372, 20130397.
Ackerberg D., Geweke J., and Hahn J. (2009) Comments on “convergence properties of the likelihood of computed dynamic models”. Econometrica 77 (6), 20092017.
Aldrich E. M. and Kung H. (2010) Computational Methods for Production-Based Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Utility. Working papers 10-90, Duke University, Department of Economics.
Anderson E. W., McGrattan E. R., Hansen L. P., and Sargent T. J. (1996) Mechanics of forming and estimating dynamic linear economies. In Amman H. M., Kendrick D. A., and Rust J. (eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 1, chap. 4, pp 171252. Netherlands: Elsevier.
Aruoba S. B., Fernández-Villaverde J., and Rubio-Ramírez J. F. (2006) Comparing solution methods for dynamic equilibrium economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30 (12), 24772508.
Benigno P. and Woodford M. (2012) Linear-quadratic approximation of optimal policy problems. Journal of Economic Theory 147 (1), 142.
Bergstrom A. (1984) Continuous time stochastic models and issues of aggregation over time. In Griliches Z. and Intriligator M. D. (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 2, chap. 20, 11451212, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Binsbergen J. v., Fernández-Villaverde J., Koijen R. S., and Rubio-Ramírez J. (2012) The term structure of interest rates in a DSGE model with recursive preferences. Journal of Monetary Economics 59 (7), 634648.
Blanchard O. (2009) The state of macro. Annual Review of Economics 1 (1), 209228.
Brennan M. J. (1998) The role of learning in dynamic portfolio decisions. European Finance Review 1 (3), 295306.
Brunnermeier M. K. and Sannikov Y. (2014) A macroeconomic model with a financial sector. American Economic Review 104 (2), 379421.
Caldara D., Fernández-Villaverde J., Rubio-Ramírez J., and Yao W. (2012) Computing DSGE models with recursive preferences and stochastic volatility. Review of Economic Dynamics 15 (2), 188206.
Candler G. V. (2004) Finite difference methods for continuous time dynamic programming. In Marimon R. and Scott A. (eds.), Computational Methods for the Study of Dynamic Economies, chap. 8, pp. 172194. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Chang F. R. (2009) Stochastic Optimization in Continuous Time, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Collard F. and Juillard M. (2001) Accuracy of stochastic perturbation methods: The case of asset pricing models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25 (6–7), 979999.
Den Haan W. J. and De Wind J. (2010) How Well-Behaved are Higher-Order Perturbation Solutions? DNB working papers 240, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
Den Haan W. J. and Marcet A. (1994) Accuracy in simulations. Review of Economic Studies 61 (1), 317.
Doraszelski U. and Judd K. L. (2012) Avoiding the curse of dimensionality in dynamic stochastic games. Quantitative Economics 3 (1), 5393.
Fernández-Villaverde J., Rubio-Ramírez J. F., and Santos M. S. (2006) Convergence properties of the likelihood of computed dynamic models. Econometrica 74 (1), 93119.
Furlanetto F. and Seneca M. (2014) New perspectives on depreciation shocks as a source of business cycle fluctuations. Macroeconomic Dynamics 18, 12091233.
Gaspar J. and Judd K. (1997) Solving large-scale rational-expectations models. Macroeconomic Dynamics 1 (1), 4575.
Gourio F. (2012) Disaster risk and business cycles. American Economic Review 102 (6), 27342766.
Grinols E. L. and Turnovsky S. J. (1993) Risk, the financial market, and macroeconomic equilibrium. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 17 (1–2), 136.
Harvey A. and Stock J. H. (1989) Estimating integrated higher-order continuous time autoregressions with an application to money-income causality. Journal of Econometrics 42, 319336.
Heer B. and Maussner A. (2009) Dynamic General Equilibrium Modeling: Computational Methods and Applications, 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Judd K. L. (1996) Approximation, perturbation, and projection methods in economic analysis. In Amman H. M., Kendrick D. A., and Rust J. (eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 1, chap. 12, pp. 509585. Netherlands: Elsevier.
Judd K. L. (1998) Numerical Methods in Economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Judd K. L. and Guu S. M. (1993) Perturbation methods for economic growth models. In Varian H. R. (ed.), Economic and Financial Modeling with Mathematica, chap. 2, pp. 80103. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kimball M. S. (2014) Effect of uncertainty on optimal control models in the neighbourhood of a steady state. Geneva Risk Insurance Review 39 (1), 239.
Kompas T. and Chu L. (2012) A comparison of parametric approximation techniques to continuous-time stochastic dynamic programming problems: Applications to natural resource modelling. Enviornmental Modelling and Software 38, 112.
Kydland F. E. and Prescott E. C. (1982) Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 50 (6), 13451370.
Ljungqvist L. and Sargent T. J. (2004) Recursive Macroeconomic Theory, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Magill M. J. P. (1977a) Some new results on the local stability of the process of capital accumulation. Journal of Economic Theory 15 (1), 174210.
Magill M. J. P. (1977b) A local analysis of n-sector capital accumulation under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory 15 (1), 211219.
McCandless G. (2008) The ABCs of RBCs: An Introduction to Dynamic Macroeconomic Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McGrattan E. (2004) Application of weighted residual methods to dynamic economic models. In Marimon R. and Scott A. (eds.), Computational Methods for the Study of Dynamic Economies, chap. 6, pp. 114142. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Miranda M. J. and Fackler P. L. (2002) Applied Computational Economics and Finance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nuño G. and Thomas C. (2015) Monetary Policy and Sovereign Debt Vulnerability. Tech. rep., Banco de Espana. Unpublished.
Posch O. (2011) Risk premia in general equilibrium. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35 (9), 15571576.
Posch O. and Trimborn T. (2013) Numerical solution of dynamic equilibrium models under poisson uncertainty. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37 (12), 26022622.
Rubio-Ramírez J. F. and Fernández-Villaverde J. (2005) Estimating dynamic equilibrium economies: Linear versus nonlinear likelihood. Journal of Applied Econometrics 20 (7), 891910.
Stokey N. L. (2009) The Economics of Inaction. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Swanson E. T. (2012) Risk aversion and the labor margin in dynamic equilibrium models. American Economic Review 102 (4), 16631691.
Tapiero C. S. and Sulem A. (1994) Computational aspects in applied stochastic control. Computational Economics 7 (2), 109146.
Taylor J. B. and Uhlig H. (1990) Solving nonlinear stochastic growth models: A comparison of alternative solution methods. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 8 (1), 117.
Turnovsky S. J. and Smith W. T. (2006) Equilibrium consumption and precautionary savings in a stochastically growing economy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30 (2), 243278.
Wachter J. (2013) Can time-varying risk of rare disasters explain aggregate stock market volatility? Journal of Finance 68 (3), 9871035.
Wälde K. (2011) Production technologies in stochastic continuous time models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35 (4), 616622.
Xia Y. (2001) Learning about predictability: The effects of parameter uncertainty on dynamic asset allocation. Journal of Finance 56 (1), 205246.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Macroeconomic Dynamics
  • ISSN: 1365-1005
  • EISSN: 1469-8056
  • URL: /core/journals/macroeconomic-dynamics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 81 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 933 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 23rd May 2017 - 21st November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.