Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:57:12.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CREDIT MARKETS AND INVESTMENT IN RENEWABLE ENERGY UNDER UNCERTAINTY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2016

Alexandra Vinogradova
Alexandra Vinogradova*
Affiliation:
Center of Economic Research, ETH Zurich
*
Address correspondence to: Alexandra Vinogradova, Center of Economic Research, CER-ETH, Zurich, Switzerland; e-mail: avinogradova@ethz.ch.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study examines the problem facing a resource-importing economy seeking to achieve energy independence by developing a renewable substitute. The invention of the substitute is assumed to follow a stochastic process that can be influenced by investment in energy research and development. I analyze the optimal investment strategy under alternative assumptions with respect to the economy's access to international financial markets, the terms on which credit is available, and the country's degree of dependence on resource imports. It is found that, in general, having access to capital markets does not necessarily lead to a higher investment rate. However, in the empirically relevant range of elasticity of intertemporal consumption substitution, the economy with access to credit invests more than under financial autarky. A higher degree of dependence on resource imports implies a lower optimal investment. Arrival of the substitute does not necessarily cause an immediate improvement in the net foreign asset position but may in fact cause its further deterioration.

Keywords

Nonrenewable ResourceCapital MarketUncertaintyBackstop
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , September 2017 , pp. 1252 - 1276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amigues, J.-P., Favard, P., Gaudet, G., and Moreaux, M. (1998) On the optimal order of natural resource use when the capacity of the inexaustible substitute is limited. Journal of Economic Theory 80 (1), 153–170.Google Scholar
Boukas, E.K., Haurie, A., and Michel, P. (1990) An optimal control problem with a random stopping time. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 64 (3), 471–480.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P., Eastwood, R., and Heal, G. (1978) Resource management in a trading economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 92 (2), 297–306.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P., Gilbert, R., and Stiglitz, J. (1983) Strategic considerations in invention and innovation: The case of natural resources. Econometrica 51 (5), 1439–1448.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1981) Resource depletion under technological uncertainty. Econometrica 49 (1), 85–104.Google Scholar
Djajić, S. (1988) A model of trade in exhaustible resources. International Economic Review 29 (1), 87–103.Google Scholar
Epstein, L.G. and Zin, S.E. (1991) Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: An empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy 99 (2), 263–286.Google Scholar
Gerlagh, R. and Liski, M. (2011) Strategic resource dependence. Journal of Economic Theory 146, 699–727.Google Scholar
Gerlagh, R. and Liski, M. (2012) Resource Relationships. Unpublished manuscript, CESifo-group.Google Scholar
Hansen, L.P. and Singleton, K.J. (1982) Generalized instrumental variables estimation of nonlinear rational expectations models. Econometrica 50 (5), 1269–1286.Google Scholar
Harris, C. and Vickers, J. (1995) Innovation and natural resources: A dynamic game with uncertainty. RAND Journal of Economics 26 (3), 418–430.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H. (1931) The economics of exhaustible resources. Journal of Political Economy 39 (2), 137–175.Google Scholar
Hung, N.M. and Quyen, N.V. (1993) On R&D timing under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 17, 971–991.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (2006a) Energy Policies of IEA Countries–Switzerland 2007 Review. International Energy Agency, OECD, Paris. Available at http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2007/switzerland2007.pdf.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (2006b) Renewable Energy RD&D Priorities. International Energy Agency, OECD, Paris. Available at http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/renewenergy-1.pdf.Google Scholar
Jaakkola, N. (2012) Green Technologies and the Protracted End to the Age of Oil: A Strategic Analysis. OxCarre Research Paper 99.Google Scholar
Kamien, M.I. and Schwartz, N.L. (1978) Optimal exhaustible resource depletion with endogenous technical change. Review of Economic Studies 45 (1), 179–196.Google Scholar
Kemp, M.C. and Long, N.V. (1984) The role of natural resources in trade models. In Jones, R.W. and Kennen, P.B. (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Chap. 8. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Ploeg, F. van der (2012) Breakthrough Renewables and the Green Paradox. OxCarre Research Paper 91.Google Scholar
Toche, P. (2005) A tractable model of precautionary saving in continuous time. Economics Letters 87 (2), 267–272.Google Scholar
Tsur, Y. and Zemel, A. (2003) Optimal transition to backstop substitutes for nonrenewable resources. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 27, 551–572.Google Scholar
Vissing-Jørgensen, A. (2002) Limited asset market participation and the elasticity of intertemporal substitution. Journal of Political Economy 110 (4), 825–853.Google Scholar