Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-hzqq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T18:02:46.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DIRECTED TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE: A KNOWLEDGE-BASED MODEL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2013

Tailong Li ,
Shiyuan Pan  and
Heng-fu Zou
Tailong Li
Affiliation:
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University
Shiyuan Pan*
Affiliation:
Zhejiang University
Heng-fu Zou
Affiliation:
Central University of Finance and Economics
*
Address correspondence to: Shiyuan Pan, Center for Research of Private Economy and School of Economics, Zhejiang University, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, People's Republic of China; e-mail: shiyuanpan@zju.edu.cn.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a knowledge-based growth model where skilled workers are used in innovation and production, skill-biased technological change may lower average R&D productivity via an innovation possibilities frontier effect that eliminates scale effects. We show that skill-biased technological change increases the skill premium even if the elasticity of substitution between skilled and unskilled workers is less than two. Trade between developed countries promotes skill-biased technological change, thus raising wage inequality. Trade between developed and developing countries has differing effects: it induces relatively skill-replacing technological change and lowers wage inequality in the developed country but has the opposite effects in the developing country. Finally, we show that trade can stimulate or hurt economic growth.

Keywords

Directed Technological ChangeScale EffectWage InequalityTrade

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 116 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron (1998) Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 1055–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron (2002a) Directed technical change. Review of Economic Studies 69, 781–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron (2002b) Technical change, inequality and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature 40, 7–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron (2003a) Labor- and capital-augmenting technical change. Journal of the European Economic Association 1, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron (2003b) Patterns of skill premia. Review of Economic Studies 70, 199–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron (2007) Equilibrium bias of technology. Econometrica 75, 1371–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron (2009) Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron and Fabrizio Zilibotti (2001) Productivity difference. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 563–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, Philippe, Carloli, Eve, and Garcí-Peñalosa, Cecilia (1999) Inequality and economic growth: The perspective of the new growth theories. Journal of Economic Literature 37, 1615–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, Philippe and Howitt, Peter (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60, 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, Philippe and Peter Howitt (1998) Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Spolaore, Enrico, and Wacziarg, Romain (2005) Trade, growth and the size of countries. In Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Autor, David, Krueger, Alan, and Katz, Lawrence (1998) Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market? Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 1169–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinopoulos, E. and Segerstrom, P. (1999) A Schumpeterian model of protection and relative wages. American Economic Review 89, 450–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinopoulos, E., Syropoulos, C., Xu, B., and Yotov, Y. (2010) Intra-industry Trade and Wage-Income Inequality. Working paper, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Dinopoulos, E. and Thompson, P. (1998) Schumpeterian growth without scale effects. Journal of Economic Growth 3, 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epifani, P. and Gancia, G. (2006) Increasing returns, imperfect competition and factor frices. Review of Economics and Statistics 88, 583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epifani, P. and Gancia, G. (2008) The skill bias of world trade. Economic Journal 118, 927–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, R.C. (1998) Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, R.C. and Hanson, G.H. (1996) Globalization, outsourcing and wage inequality. American Economic Review 86, 240–245.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Andreas, Krusell, Per, and Violante, Giovanni L. (2005) The effects of technical change on labor market inequalities. In Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles (1995a) R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103, 759–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles (1995b) Time series tests of endogenous growth models. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 495–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles (1999) Growth: With or without scale effect? American Economic Review 89, 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles (2005) Growth and ideas. In Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Katz, L. and Murphy, K. (1992) Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: Supply and demand factors. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 35–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortum, Samuel (1997) Research, patenting and technological growth. Econometrica 65, 1389–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P.R. (1995) Growing world trade: Causes and consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 327–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P.R. (2000) Technology, trade and factor prices. Journal of International Economics 50, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krusell, P., Ohanian, L., Rios-Rull, J.-V., and Violante, G.L. (2000) Capital skill complementarity and inequality: A macroeconomic analysis. Econometrica 68, 1029–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laincz, Christopher and Peretto, Pietro (2006) Scale effects in endogenous growth theory: An error of aggregation not specification. Journal of Economic Growth 11, 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuyama, K. (2007) Beyond icebergs: Toward a theory of biased globalization. Review of Economic Studies 74, 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurin, E., Thesmar, D., and Thoenig, M. (2002) Globalization and the Demand for Skill: An Export Based Channel. CEPR discussion paper 3406.Google Scholar
Neary, J. Peter (2002) Foreign competition and wage inequality. Review of International Economics 10, 680–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretto, Pietro (1998) Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth 3, 283–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretto, Pietro and Smulders, Sjak (2002) Technological distance, growth and scale effects. Economic Journal 112, 603–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera-Batiz, Luis A. and Romer, Paul M. (1991) Economic integration and endogenous growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 531–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Paul M. (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98, 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segerstrom, Paul (1998) Endogenous growth without scale effects. American Economic Review 88, 1290–1310.Google Scholar
Thoenig, Mathias and Verdier, Thierry (2003) A theory of defensive skill-biased innovation and globalization. American Economic Review 93, 709–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unel, Bulent (2010) Firm heterogeneity, trade, and wage inequality. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34, 1369–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Alwyn (1998) Growth without scale effects. Journal of Political Economy 106, 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar