Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-shngb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-12T16:05:29.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LEARNABILITY OF E–STABLE EQUILIBRIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2013

Atanas Christev  and
Sergey Slobodyan
Atanas Christev*
Affiliation:
Heriot-Watt University and IZA
Sergey Slobodyan
Affiliation:
CERGE-EI
*
Address correspondence to: Atanas Christev, Department of Economics, Mary Burton Building, Room 1.4, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK; e-mail: A.Christev@hw.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

If private sector agents update their beliefs with a learning algorithm other than recursive least squares, expectational stability or learnability of rational expectations equilibria (REE) is not guaranteed. Monetary policy under commitment, with a determinate and E-stable REE, may not imply robust learning stability of such equilibria if the RLS speed of convergence is slow. In this paper, we propose a refinement of E-stability conditions that allows us to select equilibria more robust to specification of the learning algorithm within the RLS/SG/GSG class. E-stable equilibria characterized by faster speed of convergence under RLS learning are learnable with SG or generalized SG algorithms as well.

Keywords

Adaptive LearningExpectational StabilityStochastic GradientSpeed of Convergence

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 18 , Issue 5 , July 2014 , pp. 959 - 984
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Arrow, K.J. (1974) Stability independent of adjustment speed. In Horwich, G. and Samuelson, P.A. (eds.), Trade, Stability, and Macroeconomics, pp. 181–201. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barucci, E. and Landi, L. (1997) Least mean squares learning in self-referential linear stochastic models. Economics Letters 57, 313–317.Google Scholar
Benveniste, A., Métivier, M., and Priouret, P. (1990) Adaptive Algorithms and Stochastic Approximations. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bullard, J. (2006) The learnability criterion and monetary policy. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 88, 203–217.Google Scholar
Bullard, J. and Mitra, K. (2007) Determinacy, learnability, and monetary policy inertia. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39, 1177–1212.Google Scholar
Carlson, D. (1968) A new criterion for H-stability of complex matrices. Linear Algebra and Its Applications 1, 59–64.Google Scholar
Clarida, R., Gali, J., and Gertler, M. (1999) The science of monetary policy: A new Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 37, 1661–1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCanio, S.J. (1979) Rational expectations and learning from experience. Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, 47–57.Google Scholar
Evans, G.W. (1985) Expectational stability and the multiple equilibria problem in linear rational expectations models. Quarterly Journal of Economics 100, 1217–1233.Google Scholar
Evans, G.W. and Honkapohja, S. (1993) Adaptive forecasts, hysteresis, and endogenous fluctuations. Economic Review Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 1, 1–23.Google Scholar
Evans, G.W. and Honkapohja, S. (1998) Stochastic gradient learning in the cobweb model. Economics Letters 61, 333–337.Google Scholar
Evans, G.W. and Honkapohja, S. (2001) Learning and Expectations in Macroeconomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G.W. and Honkapohja, S. (2003) Adaptive learning and monetary policy design. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 35, 1045–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G.W. and Honkapohja, S. (2006) Monetary policy, expectations and commitment. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 108, 15–38.Google Scholar
Evans, G.W., Honkapohja, S., and Williams, N. (2010) Generalized stochastic gradient learning. International Economic Review 51, 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G.W. and McGough, B. (2010) Implementing optimal monetary policy in new-Keynesian models with inertia. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 10.Google Scholar
Ferrero, G. (2007) Monetary policy, learning and the speed of convergence. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31, 3006–3041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannitsarou, C. (2005) E-stability does not imply learnability. Macroeconomic Dynamics 9, 276–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, M. (2000) Convergence of adaptive learning and expectational stability: The case of multiple rational-expectations equilibria. Macroeconomic Dynamics 4, 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C.R. (1974a) Second, third, and fourth order D–stability. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards USA 78, 11–13.Google Scholar
Johnson, C.R. (1974b) Sufficient conditions for D–stability. Journal of Economic Theory 9, 53–62.Google Scholar
Llosa, L.-G. and Tuesta, V. (2009) Learning about monetary policy rules when the cost-channel matters. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33, 1880–1896.Google Scholar
Magnus, J.R. and Neudecker, H. (1999) Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and Econometrics. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Marcet, A. and Sargent, T.J. (1989) Convergence of least-squares learning mechanisms in self-referential linear stochastic models. Journal of Economic Theory 48, 337–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcet, A. and Sargent, T.J. (1995) Speed of convergence of recursive least squares: Learning with autoregressive moving-average perceptions. In Kirman, A. and Salmon, M. (eds.), Learning and Rationality in Economics, pp. 179–215. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milani, F. (2007) Expectations, learning and macroeconomic persistence. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 2065–2082.Google Scholar
Tetlow, R.J. and von zur Muehlen, P. (2009) Robustifying learnability. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33, 296–316.Google Scholar