Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa


  • Thomas E. Cone (a1) and Paul Shea (a2)

We assume that firms are more risk averse than households and that they manage their risk through a financial sector, which consists of learning and hedging. Firms that learn (by observing demand shocks) face less uncertainty and produce more than firms that hedge (by selling future production at a fixed price). If a policy or parameter change stabilizes the economy, then there is less learning and usually less production. Welfare, however, is usually maximized when the financial sector, which requires inputs but does not directly provide utility or affect production, is smallest. Monetary policy can improve welfare by either taxing learning or subsidizing hedging. If firms are risk averse over nominal profits instead of real profits, then interest rate policy can also improve welfare by stabilizing prices and thus minimizing the size of the financial sector.

Corresponding author
Address correspondence to: Paul Shea, Bates College, 270 Pettengill Hall, Leviston, ME 04240, USA; e-mail:
Hide All

We thank two anonymous referees, George Evans, as well as seminar participants at the Stanford Institute for Theoretical Economics, SUNY Brockport, the University of Kentucky, and Bates College for helpful comments. All errors are the authors' responsibility.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Macroeconomic Dynamics
  • ISSN: 1365-1005
  • EISSN: 1469-8056
  • URL: /core/journals/macroeconomic-dynamics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 10 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 45 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 24th August 2017 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.