Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:44:33.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MIXTURE DISTRIBUTION HYPOTHESIS AND THE IMPACT OF A TOBIN TAX ON EXCHANGE RATE VOLATILITY: A REASSESSMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2015

Olivier Damette
Olivier Damette*
Affiliation:
Université de Lorraine
*
Address correspondence to: Olivier Damette, Faculté de Droit et de Sciences Economiques, Université de Lorraine, BETA-CNRS, and LEF-INRA, 13 place Carnot, 54035 Nancy Cedex, France; e-mail: olivier.damette@univ-lorraine.fr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper applies smooth transition regressions to incorporate nonlinearity into the impact of trading volume on exchange rate volatility, the so-called mixture distribution hypothesis (MDH). Linking this analysis to the Tobin tax debate, we provide the first empirical corroboration that such a tax may be effective in limiting speculation and reducing exchange rate volatility, especially in turbulent times. Our study points to two main results. First, we show that nonlinearities should be taken into account to explain the MDH. When volatility, spreads, and volume are simultaneously high, the relationship between trading volume and volatility tends to grow stronger and thus the MDH holds in turbulent periods. Second, on the assumption of constant trading volume elasticity, a Tobin tax would have been stabilizing and effective in the 2008 crisis.

Keywords

Tobin TaxExchange Rate VolatilitySTR ModelsNonlinearityMixture Distribution Hypothesis
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 20 , Issue 6 , September 2016 , pp. 1600 - 1622
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aliber, R., Chowdhry, B., and Yan, S. (2003) Some evidence that a tax on foreign exchange transactions may increase volatility. European Finance Review 7, 481–510.Google Scholar
Areosa, W.D., McAleer, M., and Medeiros, M.C. (2011) Moment-based estimation of smooth transition regression models with endogenous variables. Journal of Econometrics 165, 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacchetta, P. and Van Wincoop, E. (2003) Can Information Heterogeneity Explain the Exchange Rate Determination Puzzle? NBER working paper 9498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, D.W. and Watts, D.G. (1971) Estimating the transition between two intersecting straight lines. Biometrika 58, 525–534.Google Scholar
Bauwens, L., Rime, D., and Sucarrat, G. (2006) Exchange rate volatility and the mixture of distribution hypothesis. Empirical Economics 30, 889–911.Google Scholar
Bianconi, G., Galla, T., Marsili, M., and Pin, P. (2009) Effects of Tobin taxes in minority game markets. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 70 (1–2), 231–240.Google Scholar
Bird, G. and Rajan, R.S. (1999) Would International Currency Taxation Help Stabilise Exchange Rates and Avoid Currency Crises in Developing Countries? Centre for International Economic Studies (CIES), University of Adelaide, CIES Discussion Paper No. 99/11.Google Scholar
Bird, G. and Rajan, R.S. (2001) International currency taxation and currency stabilisation in developing countries. Journal of Development Studies 37 (3), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BIS (Bank for International Settlements) (2010) Triennal Central Bank Survey of Foreign Exchange and Derivatives Market Activity in April 2010. Preliminary Global Results. Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Bismans, F. and Damette, O. (2008) Currency transaction tax elasticity: An econometric estimation. International Economics 3, 193–212.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, R., OHara, M., and Saar, G. (2009) How noise trading affects markets: An experimental analysis. Review of Financial Studies 22, 2275–2302.Google Scholar
Brueggemann, R. and Riedel, J. (2011) Nonlinear interest rate reaction functions for the UK. Economic Modelling, 28, 1174–1185.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. (1997) Are grains of sand in the wheels of international finance sufficient to do the job when boulders are often required? Economic Journal 107 (442), 671–686.Google Scholar
Demos, A. and Goodhart, C.A. (1996) The interaction between the frequency of market quotations, spreads and volatility in the foreign exchange market. Applied Economics 28, 377–386.Google Scholar
Ehrenstein, G. (2002) Cont–Bouchaud percolation model including Tobin tax. International Journal of Modern Physics 13, 1323–1331.Google Scholar
Ehrenstein, G., Westerhoff, F., and Stauffer, D. (2005) Tobin tax and market depth. Quantitative Finance 5 (2), 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, B., Tobin, J., and Wyplosz, C. (1995) Two cases for sand in the wheels of international finance. Economic Journal 105 (428), 162–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, J.A. (1996) How well do foreign exchange markets function: Might a Tobin tax help? InI. Grunberg, M. Ul Haq, and Kaul, I. (eds.), The Tobin Tax: Coping with Financial Volatility, pp. 41–81. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franses, P.H. and Van Dijk, D. (2000) Non-Linear Time Series Models in Empirical Finance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1953) The case of flexible exchange rates. In Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galati, G. (2000) Trading Volumes, Volatility and Spreads in Foreign Exchange Markets: Evidence from Emerging Market Countries. BIS working paper 93, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Haberer, M. (2004) Might a Securities Transactions Tax Mitigate Excess Volatility? Some Evidence from the Literature. Discussion paper 04/06, University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Hanke, M., Huber, J., Kirchler, M., and Sutter, M. (2010) The economic consequences of a Tobin tax: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 74 (1–2), 58–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B.E. (1996) Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica 64, 413–430.Google Scholar
Hartmann, P. (1998a) Currency Competition and Foreign Exchange Markets: The Dollar, the Yen and the Euro. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, P. (1998b) Do Reuters spreads reflect currencies differences in global trading activity? Journal of International Money and Finance 17 (5), 757–785.Google Scholar
Hartmann, P. (1999) Trading volumes and transaction costs in the foreign market evidence from daily dollar–yen spot data. Journal of Banking and Finance 23 (5), 801–824.Google Scholar
Hommes, C.H. (2006) Heterogeneous agent models in economics and finance. In Tesfatsion, L. and Judd, K.L. (eds.), Agent-based Computational Economics (Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2), Chap. 23, pp. 1109–1186. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Jawadi, F. and Ureche-Rangau, L. (2013) Threshold linkages between volatility and trading volume: Evidence from developed and emerging markets. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 17 (3), 313–333.Google Scholar
Jeanne, O. and Rose, A. (2002) Noise trading and exchange rate regimes. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 117 (2), 537–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lanne, M. and Vesala, T. (2010) The effect of a transaction tax on exchange rate volatility. International Journal of Finance and Economics 15 (2), 123–133.Google Scholar
LeBaron, B. (2006) Agent-based computational finance. In Tesfatsion, L. and Judd, K.L. (eds.), Agent-based Computational Economics (Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2), Chap. 24, pp. 1187–1232. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Mannaro, K., Marchesi, M., and Setzu, A. (2008) Using an artificial market for assessing the impact of Tobin-like transaction taxes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 67 445–462.Google Scholar
McCulloch, M. and Pacillo, G. (2011) The Tobin Tax: A Review of the Evidence. Institute of Development Studies research paper 68, pp. 1–77.Google Scholar
Melvin, M. and Taylor, M.P. (2009) The crisis in the foreign exchange market. Journal of International Money and Finance 28 (8), 1317–1330.Google Scholar
Melvin, M. and Yin, X. (2000) Public information arrival, exchange rate volatility and quote frequency. Economic Journal 110, 644–661.Google Scholar
Mende, A. and Menkhoff, L. (2003) Tobin tax effects seen from the foreign exchange markets microstructure. International Finance 6, 227–247.Google Scholar
Mougoué, M. and Aggarwal, R. (2011) Trading volume and exchange rate volatility: Evidence for the sequential arrival of information hypothesis. Journal of Banking and Finance 35 (10), 2690–2703.Google Scholar
Palley, T.I. (1999) Speculation and Tobin taxes: Why sand in the wheels can increase economic efficiency. Journal of Economics 69 (2), 113–126.Google Scholar
Pellizzari, P. and Westerhoff, F. (2009) Some effects of transaction taxes under different microstructures. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 72, 850–863.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. (1986) Understanding spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 33, 311–340.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2008) The Currency Transaction Tax: Rate and Revenues Estimates. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Shi, K. and Xu, J. (2009) Entry cost, the Tobin tax, and noise trading in the foreign exchange market. Canadian Journal of Economics 42 (4), 1501–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spahn, P.B. (2002) On the Feasibility of A Tax on Foreign Exchange Transactions. Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Terásvirta, T. (1994) Specification, estimation and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, 208–210.Google Scholar
Terásvirta, T. (1998) Modeling relationships with smooth transition regressions. In Ullah, A. and Giles, D.E. (eds.), Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, pp. 507–552. New York: Dekker.Google Scholar
Terásvirta, T. (2004) Smooth transition regressions modeling. In Lutkepohl, H. and Kratzig, M. (eds.), Applied Time Series Econometrics, pp. 222–242. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. (1974) The New Economics One Decade Older: The Elliot Janeway Lectures in Honor of Joseph Schumpeter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. (1978) A proposal for international monetary reform. Eastern Economic Journal 3 (3–4), 153–159.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. (1984) On the efficiency of the financial system. Lloyds Bank Review 153 (July), 261–286.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. (1996) Prologue. In Grunberg, I., Ul Haq, M., and Kaul, I. (eds.), The Tobin Tax: Coping with Financial Volatility, pp. 9–18. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, D., Terásvirta, T., and Franses, P.H. (2002) Smooth transition autoregressive models. A survey of recent developments. Econometric Reviews 21, 1–47.Google Scholar
Werner, I.M. (2003) Comment on “Some Evidence That a Tobin Tax on Foreign Exchange Transactions May Increase Volatility.” European Finance Review 7, 511–514.Google Scholar
Westerhoff, F. (2003) Heterogeneous traders and the Tobin tax. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13, 53–70.Google Scholar
Westerhoff, F. and Dieci, R. (2006) The effectiveness of Keynes–Tobin transaction taxes when heterogeneous agents can trade in different markets: A behavioural finance approach. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30 (2), 293–322.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J. (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zellner, A. and Theil, H. (1962) Three-stage least squares: Simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations. Econometrica 30, 54–78.Google Scholar