Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:16:32.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MONETARY NEUTRALITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2017

Apostolos Serletis*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Zisimos Koustas
Affiliation:
Brock University
*
Address correspondence to: Apostolos Serletis, Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada; e-mail: Serletis@ucalgary.ca.

Abstract

We test the long-run neutrality of money proposition for the United States paying attention to the integration and cointegration properties of the variables. We use quarterly data (over the period from 1967:1 to 2014:1) and the new Center for Financial Stability Divisia monetary aggregates. We make a comparison among the narrower monetary aggregates, M1, M2M, MZM, M2, and ALL, and the broad monetary aggregates, M4+, M4-, and M3, and show that there is no statistically significant evidence against long-run monetary neutrality, consistent with both monetarist and Keynesian macroeconomic theory.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnett, W. A. (1980) Economic monetary aggregates: An application of aggregation and index number theory. Journal of Econometrics 14, 1148.10.1016/0304-4076(80)90070-6Google Scholar
Barnett, W. A. and Chauvet, M. (2009) International financial aggregation and index number theory: A chronological half-century empirical overview. Open Economies Review 20, 137.10.1007/s11079-008-9099-zGoogle Scholar
Barnett, W. A., Liu, J., Mattson, R. S., and van den Noort, J. (2013) The new CFS Divisia monetary aggregates: Design, construction, and data sources. Open Economies Review 24, 101124.10.1007/s11079-012-9257-1Google Scholar
Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1981) Likelihood ratio tests for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49, 10571072.10.2307/1912517Google Scholar
Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. (1987) Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55, 251276.10.2307/1913236Google Scholar
Fisher, M. and Seater, J. (1993) Long-run neutrality and superneutrality in an ARIMA framework. American Economic Review 83, 402415.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, M. (1987) Interest rate smoothing and price level trend-stationarity. Journal of Monetary Economics 19, 335348.10.1016/0304-3932(87)90002-XGoogle Scholar
King, R. and Watson, M. (1997) Testing long-run neutrality. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Economic Quarterly 83, 69101.Google Scholar
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., and Shin, Y. (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics 54, 159178.10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-YGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1972) Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of Economic Theory 4, 103124.10.1016/0022-0531(72)90142-1Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1996) Nobel lecture: Monetary neutrality. Journal of Political Economy 104, 661682.10.1086/262037Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. Jr. (2000) Inflation and welfare. Econometrica 68, 247274.10.1111/1468-0262.00109Google Scholar
Phillips, P. C. B. and Perron, P. (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrica 65, 335346.10.1093/biomet/75.2.335Google Scholar
Serletis, A. and Koustas, Z. (1998) International evidence on the neutrality of money. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 30, 125.10.2307/2601265Google Scholar
Serletis, A. and Koustas, Z. (2001) Monetary aggregation and the neutrality of money. Economic Inquiry 39, 124138.10.1093/ei/39.1.124Google Scholar