Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T20:49:31.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RAMSEY MONETARY POLICY WITH CAPITAL ACCUMULATION AND NOMINAL RIGIDITIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

ESTER FAIA
ESTER FAIA*
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
*
Address correspondence to: Ester Faia, Department of Economics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Ramon Trias Fargas 25-27, 08005, Barcelona, Spain; e-mail: ester.faia@upf.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent literature on the design of optimal monetary policy has shown that deviations from price stability are small whenever prices are sticky. This paper reconsiders this issue by introducing capital accumulation in the model. Optimal monetary policy in this setup implies small deviations from price stability. The monetary authority optimally uses inflation as an explicit tax on monopolistic profits to reduce the price markup across states. Variable markup is achieved in this setup because the share of investment demand over output varies across states and in response to TFP shocks.

Keywords

Optimal Monetary PolicyCapital AccumulationNominal Rigidities

Information

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 12 , Supplement S1: Dynamic Macroeconomic Theory , April 2008 , pp. 90 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adao, Bernardino, Correia, Isabel, and Teles, Pedro (2003) Gaps and triangles. Review of Economic Studies 70 (4)699–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, Susanto and Fernald, John (1997) Returns to scale in U.S. production: Estimates and implications. Journal of Political Economy 105 (2), 249–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Guillermo (1983) Staggered prices in a utility maximization framework. Journal of Monetary Economics 12, 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarida, Richard, Gali, Jordi, and Gertler, Mark (2000) Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and some theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (1), 147–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Aubhik, King, Robert, and Wolman, Alexander L. (2003) Optimal monetary policy. Review of Economic Studies 70 (4), 825–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Robert and Wolman, Alexander L. (1999) What should the monetary authority do when prices are sticky. In Taylor, J. B., (ed.), Monetary Policy Rules, pp. 349–398. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kydland, Finn and Prescott, Edward C. (1980) Dynamic optimal taxation, rational expectations and optimal control. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 2, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. and Stokey, Nancy (1983) Optimal fiscal and monetary policy in an economy without capital. Journal of Monetary Economics 12, 55–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcet, Albert and Marimon, Ramon (1999) Recursive Contracts. Mimeo, Universitat Pompeu Fabra and European University Institute.Google Scholar
Perotti, Roberto (2004) Estimating the Effects of Fiscal Policy in OECD Countries. Mimeo, Universitá Bocconi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt-Grohe, Stephanie and Uribe, Martin (2004) Optimal fiscal and monetary policy under sticky prices. Journal of Economic Theory 114, 198–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbordone, Argia M. (2002) Prices and unit labor costs: A new test of price stickiness. Journal of Monetary Economics 49 (2)265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodford, Michael (2003) Interest and prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar