Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

THE ROLE OF RESOURCE MISALLOCATION IN CROSS-COUNTRY DIFFERENCES IN MANUFACTURING PRODUCTIVITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2016


Robert Inklaar
Affiliation:
Groningen Growth and Development Centre
Addisu A. Lashitew
Affiliation:
Rotterdam School of Management
Marcel P. Timmer
Affiliation:
Groningen Growth and Development Centre
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Misallocation of resources across firms leads to lower aggregate productivity. In this paper, we provide new estimates of manufacturing productivity differences across countries and establish by how much they would be reduced if such misallocation were eliminated. Using World Bank survey data for formal manufacturing firms in 52 low- and middle-income countries, we show that manufacturing productivity would increase by an average of 62%, but productivity gaps relative to the United States would remain large. We also find that lower-income countries do not have more to gain from reducing misallocation, as efficiency of resource allocation is uncorrelated with income levels.


Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Footnotes

We would like to thank the editor and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. We would also like to thank participants at a seminar at the University of Bielefeld and at the IARIW conference in Rotterdam, 2014, for helpful comments. Lashitew would like to thank the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) for financial support.


References

Adamopoulos, Tasso and Restuccia, Diego (2014) The size distribution of farms and international productivity differences. American Economic Review 104 (6), 16671697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, Philippe, Angeletos, George-Marios, Bannerjee, Abhijit, and Manova, Kalina (2010) Volatility and growth: Credit constraints and the composition of investment. Journal of Monetary Economics 57, 246265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelsman, Eric, Haltiwanger, John, and Scarpetta, Stefano (2013) Cross-country differences in productivity: The role of allocation and selection. American Economic Review 103 (1), 305334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, Susanto and Fernald, John G. (2002) Aggregate productivity and aggregate technology. European Economic Review 46 (6), 963991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broda, Christian and Weinstein, David E. (2006) Globalization and the gains from trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (2), 541585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buera, Francisco J., Kaboski, Joseph P. and Shin, Yongseok (2011) Finance and development: A tale of two sectors. American Economic Review 101 (5), 19642002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Ariel and Gopinath, Gita (2014) International prices and exchange rates. In Gopinath, Gita, Helpman, Elhanan, and Rogoff, Kenneth (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. IV, pp. 391451. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Caselli, Francesco (2005) Accounting for cross-country income differences. In Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. I, pp. 679741. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Caves, Douglas W., Christensen, Laurits R., and Diewert, W. Erwin (1982) Multilateral comparisons of output, input and productivity using superlative index numbers. Economic Journal 92, 7386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, Gaaitzen (2014) Productivity in a distorted market: The case of Brazil's retail sector. Review of Income and Wealth 60 (3), 425608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsby, Michael W. L., Hobijn, Bart and Şahin, Ayşegül (2013) The decline of the U.S. labor share. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Fall 2013), 1–51.Google Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C., Inklaar, Robert, and Timmer, Marcel P. (2015) The next generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review 105 (10), 31503182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C. and Romalis, John (2014) International prices and endogenous quality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 129 (2), 477527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, John G. and Neiman, Brent (2011) Growth accounting with misallocation: Or, doing less with more in Singapore. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 3 (2), 2974.Google Scholar
Gollin, Douglas, Lagakos, David and Waugh, Michael E. (2014) The agricultural productivity gap. Quarterly Journal of Economics 129 (2), 939993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Robert E. and Jorgenson, Dale W. (1967) Tax policy and investment behavior. American Economic Review 57 (3), 391414.Google Scholar
Herrendorf, Berthold and Valentinyi, Ákos (2012) Which sectors make poor countries so unproductive? Journal of the European Economic Association 10 (2), 323341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Chang-Tai and Klenow, Peter J. (2009) Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (4), 14031448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Chang-Tai and Klenow, Peter J. (2010) Development accounting. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2 (1), 207223.Google Scholar
ILO (2013) Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture, 2nd ed. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Inklaar, Robert (2010) The sensitivity of capital services measurement: Measure all assets and the cost of capital. Review of Income and Wealth 56 (2), 389412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inklaar, Robert and Timmer, Marcel P. (2014) The relative price of services. Review of Income and Wealth 60 (4), 727746.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles I. (2011) Intermediate goods and weak links in the theory of economic development. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 3 (2), 128.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles I. (2013) Misallocation, economic growth, and input–output economics. In Acemoglu, Daron, Arellano, Manuel, and Dekel, Eddie (eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Tenth World Congress, Vol. II, pp. 419458. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, Dale W. and Nishimizu, Mieko (1978) U.S. and Japanese economic growth, 1952–1974: An international comparison. Economic Journal 88, 707726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melitz, Marc J. (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71 (6), 16951725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, Benjamin (2014) Productivity losses from financial frictions: Can self-financing undo capital misallocation? American Economic Review 104 (10), 31863221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muendler, Marc-Andreas (2004) Trade, Technology, and Productivity: A Study of Brazilian Manufacturers, 1986–1998. CESifo working paper 1148.Google Scholar
Olley, G. Steven and Pakes, Ariel (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64 (6), 12631297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restuccia, Diego and Rogerson, Richard (2008) Policy distortions and aggregate productivity with heterogeneous plants. Review of Economic Dynamics 11 (4), 707720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restuccia, Diego and Rogerson, Richard (2013) Misallocation and productivity. Review of Economic Dynamics 16 (1), 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani (2013) Unconditional convergence in manufacturing. Quarterly Journal of Economics 128 (1), 165204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, Anders and Schjerning, Bertel (2008) Productivity measurement in manufacturing and the expenditure approach. Review of International Economics 16 (2), 327340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syverson, Chad (2008) Markets: Ready-mixed concrete. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (1), 217234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syverson, Chad (2011) What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature 49 (2), 326365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentinyi, Ákos and Herrendorf, Berthold (2008) Measuring factor income shares at the sector level. Review of Economic Dynamics 11 (4), 820835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Biesebroeck, Johannes (2009) Disaggregate productivity comparisons: Sectoral convergence in OECD countries. Journal of Productivity Analysis 32, 6379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollrath, Dietrich (2009) How important are dual economy effects for aggregate productivity? Journal of Development Economics 88 (2), 325334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Bank (2008) Global Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures—2005 International Comparison Program. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2014), Doing Business 2014. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Inklaar supplementary material S1

Online Appendix

[Opens in a new window]
PDF 143 KB

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 163
Total number of PDF views: 678 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 1st December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Access
Hostname: page-component-79f79cbf67-xsjvs Total loading time: 1.093 Render date: 2020-12-01T22:10:14.848Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "1", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Tue Dec 01 2020 22:06:01 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

THE ROLE OF RESOURCE MISALLOCATION IN CROSS-COUNTRY DIFFERENCES IN MANUFACTURING PRODUCTIVITY
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

THE ROLE OF RESOURCE MISALLOCATION IN CROSS-COUNTRY DIFFERENCES IN MANUFACTURING PRODUCTIVITY
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

THE ROLE OF RESOURCE MISALLOCATION IN CROSS-COUNTRY DIFFERENCES IN MANUFACTURING PRODUCTIVITY
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *