Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

SOCIAL LEARNING ABOUT CONSUMPTION

  • Isabelle Salle (a1) and Pascal Seppecher (a2)
Abstract

This paper applies a social learning model to the optimal consumption rule of Allen and Carroll [Macroeconomic Dynamics 5(2001), 255–271] and delivers convincing convergence dynamics toward the optimal rule. These findings constitute a significant improvement over previous results in the literature, in terms of both speed of convergence and parsimony of the learning model. The learning model exhibits several appealing features: it is frugal, is easy to apply to a various range of learning objectives, and requires few procedures and little information. Particular care is given to behavioral interpretation of the modeling assumptions in light of evidence from the fields of psychology and social science. Our results highlight the need to depart from the genetic metaphor, and account for intentional decision-making, based on agents' relative performances. By contrast, we show that convergence is strongly hindered by exact imitation processes, or random exploration mechanisms, which are usually assumed when modeling social learning behavior. Our results suggest a method for modeling bounded rationality, which could be interestingly tested in a wide range of economic models with adaptive dynamics.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence to: Isabelle Salle, CeNDEF, Amsterdam School of Economics, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, NL-1018 WB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; e-mail: I.L.Salle@uva.nl.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

T.W. Allen and C. Carroll (2001) Individual learning about consumption. Macroeconomic Dynamics 5, 255271.

J. Arifovic (2000) Evolutionary algorithms in macroeconomic models. Macroeconomic Dynamics 4, 373414.

Y. Arifovic (1995) Genetic algorithms and inflationary economies. Journal of Monetary Economics 36 (1), 219243.

Y. Arifovic , J. Bullard , and O. Kostyshyna (2013) Social learning and monetary policy rules. Economic Journal 123 (567), 3876.

S. Bikhchandani , D. Hirshleifer , and I. Welch (1998) Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (3), 151170.

J. Binswanger (2011) Dynamic decision making with feasibility goals: A procedural-rationality approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 78 (3), 219228.

A.L. Brown , Z.E. Chua , and C.F. Camerer (2009) Learning and visceral temptation in dynamic saving experiments. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (1), 197223.

J. Bullard and J. Duffy (1998) A model of learning and emulation with artificial adaptive agents. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 22 (2), 179207.

C. Carroll (1997) Buffer stock saving and the life cycle permanent income hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1), 156.

C. Carroll (2001) A theory of the consumption function, with and without liquidity constraints. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (3), 2346.

H. Dawid (1997) Learning of equilibria by a population with minimal information. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 32, 118.

H. Dawid and K. Hornik (1996) The dynamics of genetic algorithms in interactive environments. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 19, 519.

A. Deaton (1991) Saving and liquidity constraints. Econometrica 59 (5), 12211248.

G. Ellison and D. Fudenberg (1993) Rules of thumb for social learning. Journal of Political Economy 101 (4), 612643.

G. Ellison and D. Fudenberg (1995) Word-of-mouth communication and social learning. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (1), 93125.

L. Eshelman and J. Schaffer (1993) Real-coded genetic algorithms and interval-schemata. In Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 2. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

F. Herrera , M. Lozano , and J. Verdegay (1998) Tackling real-coded genetic algorithms: Operators and tools for behavioural analysis. Artificial Intelligence Review 12, 265319.

P. Howitt and O. Özak (2013) Adaptive consumption behavior. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 39 (C), 3761.

P. Huguet , F. Dumas , J.M. Monteil , and N. Genestoux (2001) Social comparison choices in the classroom: Further evidence for students' upward comparison tendency and its beneficial impact on performance. European Journal of Social Psychology 31, 557578.

J.M. Hutchinson and G. Gigerenzer (2005) Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes 69, 97124.

A.C. Janetos (1980) Strategies of female mate choice: A theoretical analysis. Behavioral Ecological Sociobiology 7, 107112.

K. Judd (2006) Computationally intensive analyses in economics. In L. Tesfatsion and K. Judd (eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 2, Chap. 17, pp. 881884. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky (1996) On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review 103, 582591.

M. Lettau and H. Uhlig (1999) Rules of thumb versus dynamic programming. American Economic Review 89 (1), 148174.

T. Lux and S. Schornstein (2005) Genetic learning as an explanation of stylized facts of foreign exchange markets. Journal of Mathematical Economics 41 (1–2), 169196.

H. Simon (1955) A behavioural model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, 99118.

H. Simon (1976) From substantial to procedural rationality. In S.J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics, pp. 129148. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

H.A. Simon (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

J. Suls and L. Wheeler , eds (2000) Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

A. Tversky and E. Shaar (1982) Choice under conflict: The dynamics of the deferred decision. Psychological Science 3, 358361.

T. Vallée and M. Yıldızoğlu (2009) Convergence in the finite Cournot oligopoly with social and individual learning. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 72 (2), 670690.

E. Von Hippel , N. Franke , and R. W. Prügl (2009) Pyramiding: Efficient search for rare subjects. Research Policy 38 (9), 13971406.

N. Vriend (2000) An illustration of the essential difference between individual and social learning, and its consequences for computational analyses. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 24, 119.

L. Waltman , N. J. van Eck , R. Dekker , and U. Kaymak (2011) Economic modeling using evolutionary algorithms: The effect of a binary encoding of strategies. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 21, 737756.

S. Yang (2008) Genetic algorithms with memory- and elitism-based immigrants in dynamic environments. Evolutionary Computation 16 (3), 385416.

M. Yıldızoğlu (2001) Connecting adaptive behaviour and expectations in models of innovation: The potential role of artificial neural networks. European Journal of Economic and Social Systems 15 (3), 5165.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Macroeconomic Dynamics
  • ISSN: 1365-1005
  • EISSN: 1469-8056
  • URL: /core/journals/macroeconomic-dynamics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 18 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 155 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.