No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
THE VALUE OF UNCERTAINTY UNDER LIMITED COMMITMENT
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2014
Abstract
In this paper, I analyze an optimal loan contract between a risk-neutral financial intermediary and a risk-averse household, where the household receives a stochastic endowment stream that grows over time and is unable to commit to the contract. I examine the household's welfare in the equilibrium contract, and find that, first, under sufficiently rapid endowment growth, the presence of uncertainty in endowment may improve the household's welfare through relaxation of its commitment problem, and second, regardless of the endowment growth rate, the household's welfare is nonincreasing in the persistence of endowment. Numerical analysis suggests that welfare improvement from uncertainty may occur under reasonable parameters. These results have potentially important practical implications—for example, for developing countries that rely on external borrowing.
Information
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
References
REFERENCES
Abreu, Dilip, Pearce, David, and Stacchetti, Ennio (1986) Optimal cartel equilibria with imperfect monitoring. Journal of Economic Theory 39 (1), 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Fernando and Jermann, Urban J. (2000) Efficiency, equilibrium, and asset pricing with risk of default. Econometrica 68 (4), 775–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Jonathan and Gersovitz, Mark (1981) Debt with potential repudiation: Theoretical and empirical analysis. Review of Economic Studies 48 (2), 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Larry G. and Zin, Stanley E. (1989) Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: a theoretical framework. Econometrica 57 (4), 937–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, Patrick J. and Perri, Fabrizio (2002) International business cycles with endogenous incomplete markets. Econometrica 70 (3), 907–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, Timothy J. and Levine, David K. (1993) Debt-constrained asset markets. Review of Economic Studies 60 (4), 865–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, Timothy J. and Levine, David K. (2001) Liquidity constrained markets versus debt constrained markets. Econometrica 69 (3), 575–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocherlakota, Narayana R. (1996) Implications of efficient risk sharing without commitment. Review of Economic Studies 63 (4), 595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, Dirk (1999) Risk Sharing in Economies with Incomplete Markets. Unpublished paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Krueger, Dirk and Perri, Fabrizio (2006) Does income inequality lead to consumption inequality? Evidence and theory. Review of Economic Studies 73 (1), 163–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, Dirk and Uhlig, Harald (2006) Competitive risk sharing contracts with one-sided commitment. Journal of Monetary Economics 53 (7), 1661–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligon, Ethan, Thomas, Jonathan P., and Worrall, Tim (2002) Informal insurance arrangements with limited commitment: Theory and evidence from village economies. Review of Economic Studies 69 (1), 209–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ljungqvist, Lars and Sargent, Thomas J. (2004) Recursive Macroeconomic Theory, 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Spear, Stephen E. and Srivastava, Sanjay (1987) On repeated moral hazard with discounting. Review of Economic Studies 54 (4), 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Jonathan P. and Worrall, Tim (1988) Self-enforcing wage contracts. Review of Economic Studies 55 (4), 541–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, Philippe (1990) Nonexpected utility in macroeconomics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 105 (1), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrall, Tim (1990) Debt with potential repudiation. European Economic Review 34 (5), 1099–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar