Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

WHEN DOES MONETARY MEASUREMENT MATTER (MOST)?

  • Makram El-Shagi (a1)
Abstract

It has repeatedly been shown that properly constructed monetary aggregates based on index number theory (such as Divisia money) vastly outperform traditional measures of money (i.e. simple sum money) in empirical models. However, opponents of Divisia frequently claim that Divisia is “too complex” for little gain. And indeed, at first glance it looks as if simple sum and Divisia sum exhibit similar dynamics. In this paper, we want to build deeper understanding of how and when Divisia and simple sum differ empirically using monthly US data from 1990M1 to 2007M12. In particular, we look at how they respond differently to monetary policy shocks, which seems to be the most essential aspect of those differences from the perspective of the policy maker. We use a very rich, fairly agnostic setup that allows us to identify many potential nonlinearities, building on a smoothed local projections approach with automatic selection of the relevant interaction terms. We find, that—while the direction of change is often similar—the precise dynamics differ sharply. In particular in times of economic uncertainty, when the proper assessment of monetary policy is most relevant, those existing differences are drastically augmented.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence to: Makram El-Shagi, Center for Financial Development and Stability, School of Economics, Henan University, MingLun Campus, 475000 Kaifeng, Henan, China; e-mail: makram.elshagi@gmail.com
Footnotes
Hide All

The author is indebted to Harald Uhlig, Fabio Canova, Jane Binner, James Swofford, and the participants of the 3rd HenU/INFER Workshop on Applied Macroeconomics.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Barnett, W. A. (1980). Economic monetary aggregates: An application of index number and aggregation theory. Journal of Econometrics 14(1), 1148.
Barnett, W. A. (n.d). Getting It Wrong: How Faulty Monetary Statistics Undermine the Fed, the Financial System, and the Economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Barnett, W. A. (2007). Multilateral aggregation-theoretic monetary aggregation over heterogeneous countries. Journal of Econometrics 136(2), 457482.
Barnett, W. A. (1978). The user cost of money. Economics Letters 1(2), 145149.
Barnichon, R. a. C. B. (n.d.). Impulse Response Estimation by Smooth Local Projections. Technical report, Mimeo.
Binner, J. M., Bissoondeeal, R. K., Elger, T., Gazely, A. M. and Mullineux, A. W. (2005). A comparison of linear forecasting models and neural networks: An application to Euro inflation and Euro Divisia. Applied Economics 37(6), 665680.
Breitung, J. and Roling, C. (2015). Forecasting inflation rates using daily data: A nonparametric MIDAS approach. Journal of Forecasting 34(7), 588603.
Brenner, M. and Galai, D. (1989). New financial instruments for hedge changes in volatility. Financial Analysts Journal 45(4), 6165.
El-Shagi, M. (n.d.). Much Ado about Nothing: Sovereign Ratings and Government Bond Yields in the OECD. Technical report. IWH discussion papers.
El-Shagi, M. and Giesen, S. (2013). Money and inflation: Consequences of the recent monetary policy. Journal of Policy Modeling 35(4), 520537.
El-Shagi, M., Giesen, S. and Kelly, L. J. (2015). The quantity theory revisited: A new structural approach. Macroeconomic Dynamics 19(1), 5878.
El-Shagi, M. and Kelly, L. J. (2016). For they know not what they do: An analysis of monetary policy during the great moderation. Applied Economics Letters 1–5.
El-Shagi, M. and Kelly, L. J. (2014). Liquidity in the liquidity crisis: Evidence from Divisia monetary aggregates in Germany and the European crisis countries. Economics Bulletin 34(1), 6372.
Halperin, B. (n.d.). Updated Romer and Romer (2004) Measure of Monetary Policy Shocks. Technical report.
Hjertstrand, P., Swofford, J. L. and Whitney, G. A. (2016). Mixed integer programming revealed preference tests of utility maximization and weak separability of consumption, leisure, and money. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 48(7), 15471561.
Jordà, Ò. (2005). Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American Economic Review 95(1), 161182.
Jordà, Ò. (2009). Simultaneous confidence regions for impulse responses. The Review of Economics and Statistics 91(3), 629647.
Keating, J. W., Kelly, L. J., Smith, A. L. and Valcarcel, V. J. (n.d.). A model of monetary policy shocks for financial crises and normal conditions. Technical report, University of Kansas, Department of Economics.
Keating, J. W., Kelly, L. J. and Valcarcel, V. J. (2014). Solving the price puzzle with an alternative indicator of monetary policy. Economics Letters 124(2), 188194.
Mallows, C. L. (1973). Some comments on Cp. Technometrics 15(4), 661675.
Romer, C. D. and Romer, D. H. (2004). A new measure of monetary shocks: Derivation and implications. The American Economic Review 94(4), 10551084.
Romer, C. D. and Romer, D. H. (1989). Does monetary policy matter? A new test in the spirit of Friedman and Schwartz. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 4, 121170.
Tepper, J., Chauvet, M., Kelly, L. and Binner, J. M. (n.d.). Forecasting macroeconomic time series: A comparison of regime switching and recurrent neural network methods.
Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the LASSO. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 58(1), 267288.
Whaley, R. E. (2000). The investor fear gauge. The Journal of Portfolio Management 26(3), 1217.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Macroeconomic Dynamics
  • ISSN: 1365-1005
  • EISSN: 1469-8056
  • URL: /core/journals/macroeconomic-dynamics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed