Hostname: page-component-5db6c4db9b-mcx2m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-26T10:48:18.296Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

De-globalization and Decoupling: Game Changing Consequences?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2021

Michael A. Witt
INSEAD, Singapore
Peter Ping Li
University of Nottingham Ningbo China, China Copenhagen Business School, Denmark
Liisa Välikangas
Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Denmark Hanken School of Economics, Finland
Arie Y. Lewin
Duke University, USA


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Dialogue, Debate, and Discussion
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Antràs, P. 2020. De-Globalisation? Global value chains in the post-COVID-19 age. NBER Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P. J. 2011. International integration and coordination in the global factory. Management International Review, 51(2): 269283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P. J. 2021. The return of cartels? Management and Organization Review, 17(1): Scholar
Contractor, F. J. 2021. A decline in US manufacturing because of globalization and China? Don't believe this fake news. Management and Organization Review, 17(1): Scholar
The Economist. 2019, 19 October. Foggy outlook: How the twists and turns of the trade war are hurting growth. [Cited 21 December 2020]. Available from URL: Scholar
Fainshmidt, S., Witt, M. A., Aguilera, R. V., & Verbeke, A. 2020. The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4): 455466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. 2018. Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 16(4): 482495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. 2001. An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. (Eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage: 168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilinitch., A.Y., D'Aveni, R.A., & Lewin, A.Y. 1996. New organizational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science, 7(3): 211220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Federation of Robotics. 2020. Robot density in the manufacturing industry 2019. Frankfurt: International Federation of Robotics.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. 2021. Statistics on union membership. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Jannace, W., & Tiffany, P. 2019. A new world order: The rule of law, or the law of rulers? Fordham International Law Journal, 42: 1379.Google Scholar
Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. 2020. COVID-19 and the increasing centrality and power of platforms in China, the US, and beyond. Management and Organization Review, 16(4): 747752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. 2018. Globalization: What did we miss? Available from URL: Scholar
Krugman, P. 2019, October 10. What economists (including me) got wrong about globalization. Bloomberg Opinion. Available from URL: Scholar
Lewin, A.Y., Long, C. P., & Carroll, T. N. 1999. The co-evolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10(5): 535550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, A.Y., & Volberda, H. W. 1999. Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10(5): 519534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, A. Y., Weigelt, C. B., & Emery, J. B. 2004. Adaptation and selection in strategy and change: Perspectives on strategic change in organizations. In Poole, M. S. and Van de Ven, A. H. (eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation: 108160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. 1976. Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Universitesforlaget Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
Petricevic, O., & Teece, D. J. 2019. The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 50: 14871512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, E. L. 2021. The decline of US manufacturing: Issues of measurement. Management and Organization Review, 17(1): Scholar
Van Witteloostuijn, A. 2021. The post-corona crisis paradox: How labor will globalize to the benefit of emerging economies. Management and Organization Review, 17(1): Scholar
Volberda, H. W., & Lewin, A. Y. 2003. Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8): 21112136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, P 2021. De-globalisation and decoupling: Post-COVID-19 myths vs realities. Management and Organization Review, 17(1): Scholar
Witt, M. A. 2019a. China's challenge: Geopolitics, de-globalization, and the future of Chinese business. Management and Organization Review, 15(4): 687704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, M. A. 2019b. De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and implications for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7): 10531077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, M. A., Kabbach De Castro, L. R., Amaeshi, K., Mahroum, S., Bohle, D., & Saez, L. 2018. Mapping the business systems of 61 major economies: A taxonomy and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems research. Socio-Economic Review, 16(1): 538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank, 2021. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar