Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-768dbb666b-7lw58 Total loading time: 0.564 Render date: 2023-02-06T01:17:34.208Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Parochialism and Implications for Chinese Firms’ Globalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2019

Jing Betty Feng*
Farmingdale State College (SUNY), USA
Leigh Anne Liu
Georgia State University, USA
Chunyan Jiang
Nanjing University, China
Corresponding author: Jing Betty Feng (


We explore the meaning of parochialism (xiao nong yi shi, 小农意识) to explain certain paradoxical Chinese managerial behaviors. We discuss how cultural, political, and economic traditions in China formed a salient context to cultivate parochialism. Qualitative data from Chinese and American managers reveal that the conceptual framework of parochialism includes a cognitive dimension of closed-mindedness, a behavioral dimension of self-protection, and a relational dimension of in-group focused social relationship. Parochialism hampers effective globalization of Chinese firms because it negatively impacts key facets of organizational culture: employee development, communication, customer orientation, social responsibility, strategic planning, and innovation. The study offers theoretical and practical implications for Chinese management research and the development of global competence.




Мы исследуем значение местничества (xiao nong yi shi, 小农意识) для того, чтобы объяснить некоторые парадоксальные модели поведения в сфере управления в                        Китае. Мы обсуждаем, каким образом культурные, политические и экономические традиции в Китае сформировали особый контекст для культивирования местничества. Качественные данные, полученные на основе опроса китайских и американских менеджеров, показывают, что концептуальная модель местничества включает в себя когнитивный аспект ограниченности мышления, поведенческий аспект самосохранения и социальный аспект взаимоотношений внутри группы. Местничество является препятствием для эффективной глобализации китайских фирм, потому что оно отрицательно влияет на ключевые аспекты организационной культуры: развитие потенциала сотрудников, обмен информацией, ориентацию на клиента, социальную ответственность, стратегическое планирование и инновации. В данной работе делаются теоретические и практические выводы, которые имеют значение для китайских исследований в области управления и развития глобальной компетенции.


Exploramos el significado de parroquialismo (xiao nong yi shi, 小农意识) para explicar ciertos comportamientos gerenciales chinos paradójicos. Discutimos cómo las tradiciones culturales, políticas y económicas en China formaron un contexto destacado para cultivar parroquialismo. Datos cualitativos de gerentes chinos y americanos revelan que el marco conceptual de parroquialismo incluye una dimensión cognitiva de mentalidad cerrada, una dimensión comportamental de auto-protección, y una dimensional relacional enfocada las relaciones sociales dentro del grupo. El parroquialismo obstaculiza la globalización efectiva de las empresas chinas dado sus impactos negativas en la aspectos clave de la cultura organizacional: desarrollo de empleados, comunicación, orientación al consumidor, responsabilidad social, planeación estratégica, e innovación. Este estudio ofrece implicaciones teóricas y prácticas para la investigación gerencial china y en el desarrollo de competencias globales.

Copyright © 2019 The International Association for Chinese Management Research 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Accepted by: Senior Editor Zhi-Xue Zhang



Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. 2009. Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20(1): 148.10.1080/10463280802613866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altemeyer, B. 1981. Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. 1992. Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1): 1536.10.1002/smj.4250131004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowell, A. 2011. Returning to Britain's island mentality. The Huffington Post. Scholar
Caron, J. 2014. Conservatives’ insular mindset doesn't fit today's global reality. The Japan Times. Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounding theory - A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Chen, C. C., Chen, Y.-R., & Xin, K. 2004. Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science, 15(2): 200209.10.1287/orsc.1030.0047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. C., Chen, X. P., & Huang, S. S. 2013. Guanxi and social network research: Review and future directions. Management and Organization Review, 9(1): 167207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. C., Friedman, R., & Mcallister, D. J. 2017. Seeing and studying China: Leveraging phenomenon-based research in China for theory advancement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 143: 17.10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.09.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M.-J. 2001. Inside Chinese business: A guide for managers worldwide. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
Chen, M.-J. 2002. Transcending paradox: The Chinese ‘middle way’ perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2–3): 179199.10.1023/A:1016235517735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M.-J., 2014. Becoming ambicultural: A personal quest, and aspiration for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 39(2): 119137.10.5465/amr.2013.0493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M.-J., & Miller, D. 2010. West meets East: Toward an ambicultural approach to management. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(4): 1724.10.5465/amp.2010.24.4.3651479.aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M.-J., & Miller, D. 2011. The relational perspective as a business mindset: Managerial implications for East and West. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3): 618.Google Scholar
Chen, X.-P., & Chen, C. C. 2004. On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(3): 305324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Leung, K., Ward, C., & Leong, F. 2003. The English version of the Chinese personality assessment inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(4): 433452.10.1177/0022022103034004004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Fan, R., Song, W.-Z., Zhang, J.-X., & Zhang, J. P. 1996. Development of the Chinese personality assessment inventory (CPAI). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27(2): 181199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J., & Marinova, S. 2014. The role of contextual combinations in the globalization of Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 10(3): 347371.Google Scholar
Chiu, C.-Y., Wan, C., Cheng, S. Y., Kim, Y.-H., & Yang, Y. J. 2011. Cultural perspectives on self-enhancement and self-protection. In Alicke, M. D. & Sedikides, C. (Eds.), Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection: 425451. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E.-H. 2014. Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(32): 120.Google Scholar
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. 2004. Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2): 173208.Google Scholar
Cui, Z., Liang, X., & Lu, X. 2014. Prize or price? Corporate social responsibility commitment and sales performance in the Chinese private sector. Management and Organization Review, 11(1): 2544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, X., & Li, Q. 2005. 民营中小企业成长的瓶颈--兼对小农意识的批判 (The bottleneck of the growth of private small and medium – sized enterprises – criticism on Xiao Nong Yi Shi). Technoeconomics & Management Research, 6: 5051.Google Scholar
Dietz, M. C., Orr, G., & Xing, J. 2008. How Chinese companies can succeed abroad. McKinsey Quarterly, 3: 19.Google Scholar
Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A. 2004. Generation cohorts and personal values: A comparison of China and the United States. Organization science, 15(2): 210220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbank, J. K. 1979. The United States and China. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Farh, J.-L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S.-C. 1997. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Admistrative Science Quarterly, 42(3): 421444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, G. O., & Fang, T. 2008. Changing Chinese values: Keeping up with paradoxes. International Business Review, 17(2): 194207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fei, X., Hamilton, G. G., & Wang, Z. 1992. From the soil, the foundations of Chinese society: A translation of Fei Xiaotong's Xiangtu Zhongguo, with an introduction and epilogue. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Feng, J. B., Liu, L. A., & Friedman, R. 2015. Cross-Cultural adaptation to functional fitness: Evidence from Chinese Firms Operating in the United States. Paper presented to the 2015 Academy of Management Meeting: 11373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, M., Rui, O. M., & Wu, W. 2011. Cooking the books: Recipes and costs of falsified financial statements in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2): 371390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. 2012. Locating Chinese work behavior in a global perspective. In Huang, X. & Bond, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory, research, and practice: 4862. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., & Lim, B. C. 2011. Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033): 11001104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerth, K. 2010. As China goes, so goes the world: How Chinese consumers are transforming everything, New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(15): 1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graafland, J., & Zhang, L. 2014. Corporate social responsibility in China: Implementation and challenges. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(1): 3449.10.1111/beer.12036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepper, E. G., Sedikides, C., & Cai, H. 2013. Self-enhancement and self-protection strategies in China: Cultural expressions of a fundamental human motive. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1): 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, D. Y.-F. 1976. On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4): 867884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: London, UK: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hong, Y.-Y., & Cheon, B. K. 2017. How does culture matter in the face of globalization? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5): 810823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Huang, X., & Bond, M. H. 2012. Why we need this edited book now! In Huang, X. & Bond, M. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory, research and practice: 310. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, A. S. 1990. Mapping strategic thought. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Huff, L., & Kelley, L. 2003. Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: A seven-nation study. Organization Science, 14(1): 8190.10.1287/orsc. Scholar
Humborstad, S. I. W., Humborstad, B., Whitfield, R., & Perry, C. 2008. Implementation of empowerment in Chinese high power-distance organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(7): 13491364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, M. F. Jr, & Miller, G. R. 1968. Open-and closed-mindedness, belief-discrepant communication behvior, and tolerance for cognitive inconsistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(1): 35–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, K., Zhu, C. J., Cooper, B. K., Zhang, Y., & Shao, S. 2009. Perceptions of the effectiveness of training and development of ‘grey-collar'workers in the People's Republic of China. Human Resource Development International, 12(3): 279296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K.-K. 1987. Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4): 944974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. 2003. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3): 339375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. 2007. Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7): 9891007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruglanski, A. W. 2013. The psychology of closed mindedness. New York: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalwani, A. K., Shavitt, S., & Johnson, T. 2006. What is the relation between cultural orientation and socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1): 165178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, D. Y., & Dawes, P. L. 2005. Guanxi, trust, and long-term orientation in Chinese business markets. Journal of International Marketing, 13(2): 2856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K. 2008. Chinese culture, modernization, and international business. International Business Review, 17(2): 184187.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K. 2012a. Indigenous Chinese management research: Like it or not, we need it. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 15.10.1111/j.1740-8784.2012.00288.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K. 2012b. Theorizing about Chinese organizational behavior: The role of cultural and social forces. In Huang, X. & Bond, M. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory, research and practice. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Leung, K. 2014. Globalization of Chinese firms: What happens to culture. Management and Organization Review, 10(3): 391397.Google Scholar
Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. 2004. Social axioms: A model for social beliefs in multicultural perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36: 119197.Google Scholar
Leung, K., Bond, M. H., Carrasquel, S. R. D., Muñoz, C., Hernández, M., Murakami, F., Yamaguchi, S., Bierbrauer, G., & Singelis, T. M. 2002. Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(3): 286302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, O., Beechler, S., Taylor, S., & Boyacigiller., N. A. 2007. What we talk about when we talk about ‘global mindset’: Managerial cognition in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(2): 231258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 2013. Speech by Ruimin Zhang, CEO of Haier, at AOM. International Association for Chinese Management Research, Quarterly Newsletter, 9(3): 910.Google Scholar
Li, P. P., Leung, K., Chen, C. C., & Luo, J. D. 2012. Indigenous research on Chinese management: What and how. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, S. M. 1987. 中国文化要 (The essence of Chinese culture), Hong Kong: Joint Publishing (HK) Co., LtdGoogle Scholar
Lin, T. W. 2004. Corporate governance in China: Recent developments, key problems and solutions. Journal of Accounting and Corporate Governance, 1: 123.Google Scholar
Liu, D. 2013. A 股的 “异化”: 条条大路通地产 (‘Alienation’ of A share market: all the way through real estate). China Economic Weekly, 23: 3236.Google Scholar
Liu, L. A., Friedman, R. A., Barry, B., Gelfand, M. J., & Zhang, Z.-X. 2012. The dynamics of consensus building in intracultural and intercultural negotiations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(2): 269304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L. A., Friedman, R. A., & Chi, S. C. 2005. Ren Qing'versus the ‘Big Five’: The role of culturally sensitive measures of individual difference in distributive negotiations. Management and Organization Review, 1(2): 225247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, W., Friedman, R. A., & Hong, Y.-Y. 2012. Culture and accountability in negotiation: Recognizing the importance of in-group relations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1): 221234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X. 2003. The conflict between outside ‘airborne’ managers and original management team and its influence on corporate effectiveness. Management World, 6: 105113.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. 1996. 小农意识初探 (上)(The investigation of Xiao Nong Yi Shi -I). 社会科学论坛, 6: 3134.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. 1997a. 小农意识初探(下)(The investigation of Xiao Nong Yi Shi - III). 社会科学论坛, 2: 2730.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. 1997b. 小农意识初探(中)(The investigation of Xiao Nong Yi Shi -II). 社会科学论坛, 1: 3638.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Luo, Y., & Liu, T. 2009. Governing buyer–supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms: Evidence from China. Journal of Operations Management, 27(4): 294309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98(2): 224253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccarthy, K. J., Dolfsma, W., & Weitzel, U. 2016. The first global merger wave and the enigma of Chinese performance. Management and Organization Review, 12(2): 221248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadowcroft, M. 2011. The danger of our island mentality. The Guardian. Scholar
Midler, P. 2007. 'Quality fade': China's great business challenge. Knowledge Wharton. Scholar
Midler, P. 2010. Poorly made in China: An insider's account of the China production game. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Son.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Molinsky, A. L. 2013. The psychological processes of cultural retooling. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3): 683710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morosini, P., Shane, S., & Singh, H. 1998. National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 137158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, M. D. 2011. Qualitative research in business & management. London, UK: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Needham, J. 1954. Science and civilisation in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ng, I., Lee, Y.-T., & Cardona, P. 2012. Building teams in Chinese organizations. In Huang, X. & Bond, M. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory, research and practice. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. 2004. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently… and why. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. 2001. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2): 291310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orlikowski, W. J. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4): 404428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y., Rowney, J. A., & Peterson, M. F. 2012. The structure of Chinese cultural traditions: An empirical study of business employees in China. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 7795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., Brinol, P., & Jarvis, W. B. G. 2006. Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: An exploration of the PAST model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1): 2141.10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philipsen, S., & Littrell, R. F. 2011. Manufacturing quality and cultural values in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Business and Management, 2(2): 2644.Google Scholar
Rapoport, M. 2015. New York global group chief charged with securities fraud. The Wall Street Journal. Scholar
Redding, G. 1990. The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110887709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, G. 2014. The unexamined differences in dreams: Chinese firms' globalization and interface challenges. Management and Organization Review, 10(3): 399404.Google Scholar
Redding, G. 2016. The needham question today. Management and Organization Review, 12(1): 2534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickert, E. J. 1998. Authoritarianism and economic threat: Implications for political behavior. Political Psychology, 19(4): 707720.10.1111/0162-895X.00128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. 1999. A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(4): 2347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sedikides, C. 2012. Self-protection. Handbook of Self and Identity, 327353.Google Scholar
Shenkar, O. 2009. Becoming multinational: Challenges for Chinese firms. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 2(3): 149162.10.1108/17544400910994733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, F., Cadsby, C. B., & Bi, Y. 2012. Trust, reciprocity, and guanxi in China: An experimental investigation. Management and Organization Review, 8(2): 397421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sun, L. 2004. 中国文化的深层结构 (The deep structure of Chinese culture): Guilin Guangxi: Normal University Press.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2014. Island mentality: Bad schools and low aspirations used to be inner-city problems. Not any more. Scholar
Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D. A., & Russell, C. J. 2005. The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3): 270283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. 1995. Individualism & collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2006. Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 113.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2012. Contextualizing research in a modernizing China. In Huang, X. & Bond, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory, research, and practice: 1328. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2013. The spirit of science and socially responsible scholarship. Management and Organization Review, 9(3): 375394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Wang, H., & Xin, K. R. 2006. Organizational culture in China: An analysis of culture dimensions and culture types. Management and Organization Review, 2(3): 345376.10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00050.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. 1994. Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6): 10491062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, S. S., Lau, D. C.-S., & Lam, L. W. 2012. Enhancing trust in Chinese organizations. In Huang, X. & Bond, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory, research, and practice: 289306. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Wu, X. 2013. (Big losing battle): Zhe Jiang University Press.Google Scholar
Xin, K. K., & Pearce, J. L. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6): 16411658.Google Scholar
Yao, J., Zhang, Z.-X., Brett, J., & Murnighan, J. K. 2017. Understanding the trust deficit in China: Mapping positive experience and trust in strangers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 143: 8597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Y. 2000. 与中国代化 (Xiao nong yi shi and Chinese modernization): 武漢出版社.Google Scholar
Yuan, Y. 2012. 毛泽东改造小农意识的思想叙论 (The discussion of reforming peasant mentality by Mao Zedong). China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House, 1: 42–22.Google Scholar
Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341363.Google Scholar
Zhang, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., Song, L. J., Li, C., & Jia, L. 2008. How do I trust thee? The employee-organization relationship, supervisory support, and middle manager trust in the organization. Human Resource Management, 47(1): 111132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J.-D., Liu, L. A., & Liu, W. 2015. Trust and deception in negotiation: Culturally divergent effects. Management and Organization Review, 11(1): 123144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z.-X., Chen, C. C., Liu, L. A., & Liu, X.-F. 2008. Chinese traditions and Western theories: Influences on business leaders in China. In Chen, C. C. & Lee, Y. T. (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices: 239271. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Parochialism and Implications for Chinese Firms’ Globalization
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Parochialism and Implications for Chinese Firms’ Globalization
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Parochialism and Implications for Chinese Firms’ Globalization
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *