van Uden, Annelies Vermeulen, Patrick AM and Knoben, Joris 2018. Paralyzed by the dashboard light: Environmental characteristics and firm’s scanning capabilities in East Africa. Strategic Organization, p. 147612701875532.
Sarkar, Jayati and Sarkar, Subrata 2018. Bank Ownership, Board Characteristics and Performance: Evidence from Commercial Banks in India. International Journal of Financial Studies, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 17.
McGuinness, Paul B. 2018. Beyond the Board Realm: Women in Senior Management and their Impact on IPO Capital Funding. British Journal of Management,
Feng, Xunan and Johansson, Anders C. 2018. Living through the Great Chinese Famine: Early-life experiences and managerial decisions. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 48, p. 638.
Oehmichen, Jana 2018. East meets west—Corporate governance in Asian emerging markets: A literature review and research agenda. International Business Review, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 465.
Mutlu, Canan C. Van Essen, Marc Peng, Mike W. Saleh, Sabrina F. and Duran, Patricio 2018. Corporate Governance in China: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management Studies,
Pillai, Rekha and Al-Malkawi, Husam-Aldin Nizar 2018. On the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from GCC countries. Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 44, p. 394.
Cheung, Yan-leung Dai, Yunhao Ouyang, Zhiwei and Tan, Weiqiang 2018. Who leaves money on the table? The role of founder identity in Hong Kong. Applied Economics, Vol. 50, Issue. 7, p. 774.
Yasser, Qaiser Rafique Mamun, Abdullah Al and Hook, Margurite 2017. The impact of ownership structure on financial reporting quality in the east. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 178.
Lew, Yong Kyu Yu, Jing and Park, Jeong-Yang 2017. The impacts of independent director and CEO duality on performance in the Chinese post-institutional-transition era. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration,
Shawtari, Fekri Ali Har Sani Mohamad, Muslim Abdul Rashid, Hafiz Majdi and Ayedh, Abdullah Moh’d 2017. Board characteristics and real performance in Malaysian state-owned enterprises (SOEs). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 66, Issue. 8, p. 1064.
Liu, Shu-Bing Hsueh, Shun-Jen and Wu, Tsung-Pao 2017. Shareholdings of Board Members and Corporate Performance: A Panel Quantile Regression Analysis. Global Economic Review, Vol. 46, Issue. 3, p. 271.
Zhang, Dongyang 2017. Is working capital management value-enhancing through alleviating financial constraints? Evidence from Chinese non-listed firms. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Vol. 15, Issue. 4, p. 373.
Kang, ManYing and Ausloos, Marcel 2017. An Inverse Problem Study: Credit Risk Ratings as a Determinant of Corporate Governance and Capital Structure in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Economies, Vol. 5, Issue. 4, p. 47.
Rubino, Franco Ernesto Tenuta, Paolo and Cambrea, Domenico Rocco 2017. Board characteristics effects on performance in family and non-family business: a multi-theoretical approach. Journal of Management & Governance, Vol. 21, Issue. 3, p. 623.
Jiang, Fuxiu Kim, Kenneth A. Nofsinger, John R. and Zhu, Bing 2017. A pecking order of shareholder structure. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 44, p. 1.
Tang, Jianyun 2017. CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating roles of other executives and blockholding outside directors. European Management Journal, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 362.
Qiao, Penghua Fung, Anna Miao, Jianchun and Fung, Hung-Gay 2017. Powerful Chief Executive Officers and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Stewardship Theory. China & World Economy, Vol. 25, Issue. 6, p. 100.
Fainshmidt, Stav Pezeshkan, Amir Lance Frazier, M. Nair, Anil and Markowski, Edward 2016. Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation and Extension. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 53, Issue. 8, p. 1348.
Does CEO duality – the practice of one person serving both as a firm's CEO and board chair – contribute to or inhibit firm performance? Agency theory suggests that CEO duality is bad for performance because it compromises the monitoring and control of the CEO. Stewardship theory, in contrast, argues that CEO duality may be good for performance due to the unity of command it presents. The empirical evidence, largely from developed economies, is largely inconclusive. This article joins the debate by extending empirical work to the largely unexplored context of institutional transitions. Our findings, based on an archival database covering 403 publicly listed firms and 1,202 company-years in China, offer stronger support for stewardship theory and relatively little support for agency theory. Finally, we also call for a contingency perspective to specify the nature of conditions such as resource scarcity and environmental dynamism under which CEO duality may be especially valuable.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th May 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.