Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Corporatist System and Social Organizations in China

  • Kazuko Kojima (a1), Jae-Young Choe (a2), Takafumi Ohtomo (a2) and Yutaka Tsujinaka (a2)

Abstract

This article considers whether social organizations (SOs) in China have acquired more autonomy over time under the socialist market economy. To discern whether SOs are changing under the corporatist system, we use quantitative data analyses of a 2001 to 2004 survey of SOs in China. We find that the later the SOs were founded, the more autonomy they have and die more oriented they are to representing their constituents' interests. The data also verify that the later SOs were formed, the greater their desire for freedom from the party-state. Furthermore, SOs that are more autonomous tend to be more critical of the SO management system, but this holds only for SOs founded before 2000. After 2001, no correlation occurs between autonomy and the expressed desire for more freedom.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Chan, A. 1993. Revolution or corporatism? Workers and trade unions in Post-Mao China. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 29: 3161.
Dickson, B. 2001. Cooptation and corporatism in China: The logic of party adaptation. Political Science Quarterly, 115(4): 517540.
Holbig, H. 2006. Fragmented corporatism: Interest politics in China's private business sector. Paper for the ECPR Joint Sessions, Workshop 25 ‘Interest Politics in Post-Communist Democracies’, Nicosia.
Jia, X., Shen, H., & Hu, W. 2004. Trade associations at transition stage: Roles, functions, and regulatory system. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, (in Chinese).
Kennedy, S. 2008. The price of competition: The failed government eflbrt to use associations to organize China's market economy. In Unger, J. (Ed.), Associations and the Chinese state: Contested spaces: 149174. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Ma, Q. 2006. Non-governmental organizations in contemporary China: Paving the way to civil society?. New York: Routledge.
Ministry of Civil Aflairs of the People's Republic of China (Ed.), 2010. China civil affairs, statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, (in Chinese).
Pearson, M. 1994, The janus face of business associations in China: Socialist corporatism in foreign enterprises. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 31: 2546.
Saich, T. 1994. The search for civil society and democracy in China. Current History, 93(584); 260264.
Saich, T. 2000. Negotiating the state: The development of social organizations in China. The China Quarterly, 161: 124141.
Schmitter, P. C. 1974. Still the century of corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1): 85131.
Unger, J., & Chan, A. 2008. Associations in a bind: The emergence of political corporatism. In J, Unger (Ed.), Associations and the Chinese state: Contested spaces: 4868. Armonk, NY: M E. Sharpe.
Wang, M. 2000. Study on Chinese NGOs: Based on case studies. Beijing: Tsinghna University NGO Research Center and UN Regional Development Center (in Chinese).
White, G., Howell, J., & Shang, X. 1996. In search of civil society: Market reform and social change in contemporary China. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed