Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Family Involvement in Middle Management and Its Impact on the Labor Productivity of Family Firms

  • Qiongjing Hu (a1), Yanlong Zhang (a1) and Jingjing Yao (a2)
Abstract

Family business owners and researchers tend to overwhelmingly focus on the top-level structure of firms but ignore the middle-level practice – involving family members in the middle-management team. Compared to top managers at the strategic apex, middle-level managers are mainly responsible for internal operations and control, and the composition of the middle-management team has an immediate and direct impact on the overall workforce efficiency of family firms. Integrating agency theory and organizational justice perspective, we proposed that family involvement in middle management would have a negative impact on the labor productivity of family firms. We further corroborated this effect by identifying three boundary conditions at the individual (i.e., familial CEO), organizational (i.e., firm size), and regional (i.e., labor mobility) levels. Using a sample of 1,284 privately owned family firms in China, we found that family involvement in middle management, measured as the percentage of familial middle-level managers, was negatively associated with labor productivity. Furthermore, this negative relationship existed only when the CEO is a family member rather than a professional manager, when the size of the firm is large rather than small, or when the firm is located in regions with low rather than high labor mobility. These findings contribute to family business literature and provide practical implications for human resource management in family firms.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Yanlong Zhang (yanlong.zhang@gsm.pku.edu.cn)
References
Hide All
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. 2003. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58 (3): 13011327.
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. 2004. Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49 (2): 209237.
Arnold, D. J., & Quelch, J. A. 1998. New strategies in emerging markets. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40 (1): 720.
Barnett, T., & Kellermanns, F. W. 2006. Are we family and are we treated as family? Nonfamily employees’ perception of justice in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30 (6): 837854.
Barontini, R., & Caprio, L. 2006. The effect of family control on firm value and performance: Evidence from continental Europe. European Financial Management, 12 (5): 689723.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1993. Beyond the M-form: Toward a managerial theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (52): 2346.
Bergstrom, T. C. 1989. A fresh look at the rotten kid theorem and other household mysteries. Journal of Political Economy, 97 (5): 11381159.
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 2012. Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25 (3): 258279.
Birley, S. 2001. Owner-manager attitudes to family and business issues: A 16 country study. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26 (2): 6376.
Bourgeois, L. J. 1985. Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environments. Academy of Management Journal, 28 (3): 548573.
Bruce, N., & Waldman, M. 1990. The rotten kid theorem meets the Samaritan's dilemma. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105 (1): 155165.
Carney, M. 2007. Minority family business in emerging markets: Organization forms and competitive advantage. Family Business Review, 20 (4): 289300.
Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 2012. Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36 (6): 11531173.
Chang, S.-J., & Shim, J. 2016. When does transitioning from family to professional management improve firm performance? Strategic Management Journal, 36 (9): 12971316.
Chu, W. 2011. Family ownership and firm performance: Influence of family management, family control, and firm size. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28 (4): 833851.
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. 2003. Succession and nonsuccession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with nonfamily managers. Family Business Review, 16 (2): 89107.
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Steier, L. P. 2003. Extending the theoretical horizons of family business research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27 (4): 331338.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57 (6): 27412772.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1–2): 81112.
Colquitt, J. A. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3): 386400.
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. 2013. Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98 (2): 199236.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. 2005. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31 (6): 847900.
Daily, C. M., & Dollinger, M. J. 1992. An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review, 5 (2): 117136.
Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P., & Wright, P. M. 2005. Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48 (1): 135145.
De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Campopiano, G., & Cassia, L. 2015. The impact of family involvement on SMEs’ performance: Theory and evidence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53 (4): 924948.
Delery, J. E., & Shaw, J. D. 2001. The strategic management of people in work organizations: Review, synthesis and extension. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 20: 165197.
Dyer, W. G. 2006. Examining the ‘family effect’ on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19 (4): 253273.
Ensley, M. D., & Pearson, A. W. 2005. An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29 (3): 267284.
Ewing, D. W. 1965. Is nepotism so bad? Harvard Business Review, 43: 2332.
Fan, G., Wang, X. L., & Zhu, H. P. 2011. NERI INDEX of marketization of China's provinces 2011 report. Beijing: Economics Science Press.
Fenton-O'Creevy, M. 1998. Employee involvement and the middle manager: Evidence from a survey of organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19 (1): 6784.
Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. 1994. Dinosaurs or dynamos? Recognizing middle management's strategic role. Academy of Management Journal, 8 (4): 4757.
Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. 1997. Middle management's strategic influence and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 34 (3): 465485.
Fredrickson, J. W., & Mitchell, T. R. 1984. Strategic decision processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Academy of Management Journal, 27 (2): 399423.
Gerhart, B. 1990. Voluntary turnover and alternative job opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (5): 467476.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Nunez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, I. 2001. The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (1): 8195.
Guth, W. D., & Macmillan, I. C. 1986. Strategy implementation versus middle management self-interest. Strategic Management Journal, 7 (4): 313327.
Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I. C. 2003. A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (4): 451465.
Harris, D., Martinez, J. I., & Ward, J. L. 1994. Is strategy different for the family-owned business? Family Business Review, 7 (2): 159174.
He, X., Song, L., Zhu, H., & Li, X. 2014. Why does the family firm want to let go? The perception of the system environment, the political status, and the succession intention of China's family firms’ entrepreneurs. Management World, 2: 90101.
Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. 1998. Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24 (5): 623641.
Hom, P. W., & Griffeth, R. W. 1995. Employee turnover. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Pub.
Huselid, M. A. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (3): 635672.
Iverson, R. D., & Zatzick, C. D. 2011. The effect of downsizing labor on productivity: The value of showing consideration for employees’ morale and welfare in high-performance work systems. Human Resource Management, 50 (1): 2944.
Jaskiewicz, P., & Uhlenbruck, K. 2013. Is nepotism good or bad? Types of nepotism and implications for knowledge management. Family Business Review, 26 (2): 121139.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4): 305360.
Karra, N., Tracey, P., & Phillips, N. 2006. Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30 (6): 861877.
Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. 2005. Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120 (4): 13711411.
Kimberly, J. R. 1976. Organizational size and the structural perspective: A review, critique, and proposal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (4): 517597.
Lee, J., & Miller, D. 1996. Strategy, environment and performance in two technological contexts: Contingency theory in Korea. Organization Studies, 17 (5): 729750.
Lee, K. S., Lim, G. H., & Lim, W. S. 2003. Family business succession: Appropriation risk and choice of successor. Academy of Management Review, 28 (4): 657666.
Lee, T. H., Gerhart, B., Weller, I., & Trevor, C. O. 2008. Understanding voluntary turnover: Path-specific job satisfaction effects and the importance of unsolicited job offers. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (4): 651671.
Li, J., Zhou, C., & Zajac, E. J. 2009. Control, collaboration, and productivity in international joint ventures: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (8): 865884.
Li, Q., & Zhang, J. 2010. Institutional antecedent and characteristics of top executives: An empirical study. Management World, 10: 110121.
Liang, J., Chen, S., & Ge, Q. 2010. Political participation, governance structure and corporate philanthropy in Chinese private sector. Management World, 7: 109118.
Maury, B. 2006. Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12 (2): 321341.
McConaughy, D. L., Matthews, C. H., & Fialko, A. S. 2001. Founding family controlled firms: Performance, risk, and value. Journal of Small Business Management, 39 (1): 3149.
McConville, T., & Holden, L. 1999. The filling in the sandwich: HRM and middle managers in the health sector. Personnel Review, 28 (5/6): 406424.
Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. 2001. Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6): 11021122.
Peiser, R. B., & Wooten, L. M. 1991. Lite-cycle changes in small familv businesses. In Aronoff, C. E. & Ward, I. L. (Eds.), Family business sourcebook: 430441. Detroit: Omnigraphics.
Poza, E. F., Alfred, T., & Maheshawi, A. 1997. Stakeholder perceptions of culture and management practices in family and family firms-A preliminary report. Family Business Review, 10 (2): 135155.
Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. 2003. Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (4): 473490.
Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. 2001. Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12 (2): 99166.
Sciascia, S., & Mazzola, P. 2008. Family involvement in owners and management: Exploring nonlinear effects on performance. Family Business Review, 21 (4): 331345.
Silva, F., & Majluf, N. 2008. Does family ownership shape performance outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 61 (6): 609614.
Songini, L., & Gnan, L. 2015. Family involvement and agency cost control mechanisms in family small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 53 (3): 748779.
Steen, A., & Baldwin, K. 2015, October 27. Family business in China – Is there a succession crisis? Social Media Today RSS. [Cited 9 November 2016]. Available from URL: http://www.familyownedbusinessadvisors.com/2015/10/family-business-in-china/
Tsao, C. W., Chen, S. J., Lin, C. S., & Hyde, W. 2009. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: The role of high-performance work systems. Family Business Review, 22 (4): 319332.
Urwick, L. F. 1922. The manager's span of control. Harvard Business Review, 34: 3947.
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. 2006. How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (2): 385417.
Whyte, M. K. 1996. The Chinese family and economic development: Obstacle or engine? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 45 (1): 130.
Yammeesri, J., & Lodh, S. C. 2004. Is family ownership a pain or gain to firm performance? Journal of Financial Economics, 80: 385417.
Zhang, J., & Ma, H. 2008. Adoption of professional management in Chinese family business: A multilevel analysis of impetuses. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26 (1): 119139.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Management and Organization Review
  • ISSN: 1740-8776
  • EISSN: 1740-8784
  • URL: /core/journals/management-and-organization-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 26 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 84 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th May 2018 - 23rd June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.