Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

History and the Debate Over Intellectual Property

  • Mike W. Peng (a1), David Ahlstrom (a2), Shawn M. Carraher (a1) and Weilei (Stone) Shi (a3)

This article responds to recent calls for organizational research to address larger, more globally relevant questions and to pay attention to history, by analyzing the crucial debate over intellectual property rights (IPR) between the United States and China. Despite the recent US position, the United States has not always been a leading IPR advocate. Rather, it was a leading IPR violator during the nineteenth century. An institution-based view of IPR history suggests that both the US refusal to protect foreign IPR in the nineteenth century and the current Chinese lack of enthusiasm to meet US IPR demands represent rational choices. However, as cost-benefit considerations change institutional transitions are possible. We predict that to the same extent the United States voluntarily agreed to strengthen IPR protection when its economy became sufficiently innovation-driven, China will similarly improve its IPR protection.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      History and the Debate Over Intellectual Property
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      History and the Debate Over Intellectual Property
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      History and the Debate Over Intellectual Property
      Available formats
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Ahlstrom , G. D. Bruton , & K. S. Yeh 2007. Venture capital in China: Past, present, and future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24 (3): 247268.

D. Ahlstrom , D. Lamond , & Z. Ding 2009. Reexamining some management lessons from military history. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26 (4): 617642.

D. Ahlstrom , & L. C. Wang 2009. Groupthink and France's defeat in the 1940 campaign. Journal of Management History, 15(2): 159--177.

G. Ahuja , & S. Yayavaram 2011. Explaining influence rents: The case for an institution-based view of strategy. Organization Science, 22 (6): 1631–1652.

S. R. Barley 2016. Ruminations on how we became a mystery house and how we might get out. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61: 18.

P. Boeing , E. Mueller , & P. Sander 2016. China's R&D explosion: Analyzing productivity effects across ownership types and over time. Research Policy, 45 (1): 159176.

G. D. Bruton , & D. Ahlstrom 2003. An institutional view of China's venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (2): 233259.

C. Cao , N. Li , X. Li , & L. Liu 2013. Reforming China's S&T system. Science, 341 (August 2): 460462.

P. E. Chaudhry , & A. Zimmerman 2009. The economics of counterfeit trade. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

M. L. Cheng , & C. Huang 2016. Transforming China's IP system to stimulate innovation. In A. Y. Lewin , M. Kenney & J. P. Murmann (Eds.), China's innovation challenge: Overcoming the middle-income trap: 152188. New York: Cambridge University Press.

G. F. Davis 2015. What is organizational research for? Administrative Science Quarterly, 60 (2): 179188.

P. J. DiMaggio , & W. W. Powell 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2): 147160.

W. A. Friedman , & G. Jones 2011. Business history: Time for debate. Business History Review, 85 (1): 18.

J. S. Gordon 2005. Empire of wealth: The epic history of American economic power. New York: Harper Perennial.

A. Greif , & D. Laitin 2004. A theory of endogenous institutional change. American Political Science Review, 98 (4): 633652.

P. A. Hall , & R. Taylor 1996. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44: 936957.

C. W. L. Hill 2007. Digital piracy: Causes, consequences, and strategic responses. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24 (1): 925.

G. Hofstede 2007. Asian management in the 21st century. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24 (4): 411420.

A. Howell 2015. Indigenous innovation with heterogeneous risk and new firm survival in a transitioning Chinese economy. Research Policy, 44 (10): 18661876.

M.-C. Hu , & J. A. Mathews 2008. China's national innovation capacity. Research Policy, 37 (9): 14651479.

P. Ingram , & B. Silverman 2002. Introduction. In P. Ingram & B. Silverman (Eds.), The new institutionalism in strategic management: 130. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

S. Jandhyala 2015. International and domestic dynamics of intellectual property protection. Journal of World Business, 50 (2): 284293.

A. Johns 2009. Piracy: The intellectual property wars from Gutenberg to Gates. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

G. Jones , & T. Khanna 2006. Bringing history (back) into international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (4): 453468.

B. Z. Khan 2005. The democratization of invention: Patents and copyrights in American economic development, 1790-1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.

B. Z. Khan 2013. Selling ideas: An international perspective on patenting and markets for technological innovations, 1790–1930. Business History Review, 87 (1): 3968.

B. Z. Khan , & K. L. Sokoloff 2001. The early development of intellectual property institutions in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (3): 233246.

B. Z. Khan , & K. L. Sokoloff 2004. Institutions and democratic invention in nineteenth-century America. American Economic Review, 94 (2): 395401.

T. Khoury , & M. W. Peng 2011. Does institutional reform of intellectual property rights lead to more inbound FDI? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of World Business, 46 (3): 337345.

A. Kieser 1994. Why organization theory needs historical analyses – and how this should be performed. Organization Science, 5 (4): 608620.

E. A. Klochikhin 2012. Russia's innovation policy: Stubborn path-dependencies and new approaches. Research Policy, 41 (9): 16201630.

A. Y. Lewin 2015. Letter from the editor. Management and Organization Review, 11 (1): 13.

A. Y. Lewin , M. Kenney , & J. P. Murmann (Eds.). 2016. China's innovation challenge: Overcoming the middle-income trap. New York: Cambridge University Press.

S. Li 2004. Why is property right protection lacking in China? An institutional explanation. California Management Review, 46 (3): 100115.

X. Li 2012. Behind the recent surge of Chinese patenting: An institutional view. Research Policy, 41 (1): 236249.

Z. Liang , & L. Xue 2010. The evolution of China's IPR system and its impact on the patenting behaviors and strategies of multinationals in China. International Journal of Technology Management, 51 (5): 469496.

F. Liu , D. F. Simon , Y. Sun , & C. Cao 2011. China's innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory. Research Policy, 40 (7): 917937.

T. D. S. Lopes , & M. Casson 2012. Brand protection and the globalization of British business. Business History Review, 86 (2): 287310.

C. Marquis , & M. Raynard 2015. Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Academy of Management Annals, 9 (1): 291335.

R. Mazzoleni , & R. R. Nelson 1998. The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: A contribution to the current debate. Research Policy, 27 (3): 273284.

J. W. Meyer , J. Boli , G. M. Thomas , & F. O. Ramirez 1997. World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103 (1): 144181.

K. E. Meyer , & M. W. Peng 2016. Theoretical foundations of emerging economy business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 47 (1): 322.

P. Moser 2013. Patents and innovation: Evidence from economic history. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27 (1): 2344.

P. Moser , & A. Voena 2012. Compulsory licensing: Evidence from the Trading with the Enemy Act. American Economic Review, 102 (2): 396427.

A. Naghavi 2007. Strategic intellectual property rights policy and North-South technology transfer. Review of World Economics, 143 (1): 5578.

D. C. North 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Norton.

M. W. Peng 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2): 275296.

M. W. Peng 2013. An institution-based view of IPR protection. Business Horizons, 56 (2): 135139.

M. W. Peng , S. L. Sun , B. Pinkham , & H. Chen 2009. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23 (4): 6381.

M. W. Peng , D. Y. L. Wang , & Y. Jiang 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (5): 920936.

S. Poncet 2005. A fragmented China: Measure and determinants of Chinese domestic market disintegration. Review of International Economics, 13 (3): 409430.

V. Pouillard 2011. Design piracy in the fashion industries of Paris and New York in the interwar years. Business History Review, 85 (2): 319344.

K. Raustiala , & C. Sprigman 2012. The knockoff economy: How imitation sparks innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

W. Shi , S. L. Sun , B. C. Pinkham , & M. W. Peng 2014. Domestic alliance network to attract foreign partners: Evidence from international joint ventures in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (3): 338362.

K. Singh 2007. The limited relevance of culture to strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24 (4): 421428.

K. L. Sokoloff , & B. Z. Khan 1990. The democratization of invention during early industrialization: Evidence from the United States, 1790–1846. Journal of Economic History, 50 (2): 363378.

S. Steinmo , K. Thelen , & F. Longstreth (Eds.) 1992. Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

D. Wren 1987. Management history: Issues and ideas of teaching and research. Journal of Management, 13 (2): 339350.

A. Zimmerman 2013. Contending with Chinese counterfeits: Culture, growth, and management responses. Business Horizons, 56 (2): 141148.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Management and Organization Review
  • ISSN: 1740-8776
  • EISSN: 1740-8784
  • URL: /core/journals/management-and-organization-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 81
Total number of PDF views: 209 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 392 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 13th March 2017 - 26th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.