Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

State-Mediated Globalization Processes and the Adoption of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China

  • Christopher Marquis (a1), Juelin Yin (a2) and Dongning Yang (a3)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Despite the prevalence of global diffusion, little is known about the processes by which international practices are adopted and adapted within organizations around the world. Through our qualitative research on the introduction of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting at two leading Chinese companies, we identify a unique set of political mechanisms that we label state-mediated globalization, whereby powerful nation-state actors influence the ways in which corporations adopt and adapt global norms and practices. We find that businesses’ needs for political legitimacy from a key stakeholder, in this case the government, leads them to deviate systematically from the global practice in both form and content. These intentional practice adaptations are then legitimized by the government to create internationalization tools and localized standards to aid adoption by other organizations. Our findings illustrate previously unidentified mechanisms by which powerful stakeholders such as the Chinese government may mediate, and thereby direct, the ways in which corporations adopt and adapt global CSR practices. Contributions to understanding the political processes of institutional translation in the context of globalization are discussed.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      State-Mediated Globalization Processes and the Adoption of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      State-Mediated Globalization Processes and the Adoption of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      State-Mediated Globalization Processes and the Adoption of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Christopher Marquis (cmarquis@cornell.edu)
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. M. Ansari , P. C. Fiss , & E. J. Zajac 2010. Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35 (1): 6792.

S. S. Ansari , J. Reinecke , & A. Spaan 2014. How are practices made to vary? Managing practice adaptation in a multinational corporation. Organization Studies, 35 (9): 13131341.

G. Bruton , M. W. Peng , D. Ahlstrom , C. Stan , & K. Xu 2015. State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29 (1): 92114.

M. Carney , E. Gedajlovic , & X. Yang 2009. Varieties of Asian capitalism: Toward an institutional theory of Asian enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26 (3): 361380.

J. Child , & S. B. Rodrigues 2005. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management & Organization Review, 1 (3): 381410.

F. Dobbin 1994. Forging industrial policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.

K. M. Eisenhardt 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14 (1): 5774.

K. M. Eisenhardt , & M. E. Graebner 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 2532.

D. Etzion , & F. Ferraro 2010. The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21 (5): 10921107.

R. E. Freeman , & D. L. Reed 1983. Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25 (3): 88106.

M. Frenkel 2005. The politics of translation: How state-level political relations affect the cross-national travel of management ideas. Organization, 12 (2): 275301.

J. Frooman 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2): 191205.

Y. Gao 2009. Corporate social performance in China: Evidence from large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 89 (1): 2335.

M. B. Gondo , & J. Amis 2013. Variations in practice adoption: The roles of conscious reflection and discourse. Academy of Management Review, 38 (2): 229247.

I. Guler , M. F. Guillén , & J. M. Macpherson 2002. Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (2): 207232.

P. S. Hofman , & A. Newman 2014. The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment and the moderating role of collectivism and masculinity: Evidence from China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25 (5): 631652.

P. S. Hofman , J. Moon , & B. Wu 2015. Corporate social responsibility under authoritarian capitalism dynamics and prospects of state-led and society-driven CSR. Business & Society, doi:10.1177/0007650315623014.

M. T. Kennedy , & P. C. Fiss 2009. Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among US hospitals. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (5): 897918.

A. Langley 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24 (4): 691710.

H. Liang , B. Ren , & S. L. Sun 2015. An anatomy of state control in the globalization of state-owned enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 46 (2): 223240.

Y. Liu , T. Feng , & S. Li 2015. Stakeholder influences and organization responses: A case study of corporate social responsibility suspension. Management and Organization Review, 11 (3): 469491.

C. Marquis , & C. Qian 2014. Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25 (1): 127148.

C. Marquis , & M. Raynard 2015. Institutional strategies in emerging markets. The Academy of Management Annals, 9 (1): 291335.

C. Marquis , M. Toffel , & Y. Zhou 2016. Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science, 27 (2): 483504.

J. W. Meyer , & B. Rowan 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2): 4162.

J. W. Meyer , J. Boli , G. M. Thomas , & F. O. Ramirez 1997. World society and the nation-state. The American Journal of Sociology, 103 (1): 144181.

R. K. Mitchell , B. R. Agle , & D. J. Wood 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22 (4): 853886.

I. Okhmatovskiy , & R. J. David 2012. Setting your own standards: Internal corporate governance codes as a response to institutional pressure. Organization Science, 23 (1): 155176.

C. Oliver 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1): 145179.

K. Rajandran , & F. Taib 2014. The representation of CSR in Malaysian CEO statements: A critical discourse analysis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 19 (3): 303317.

M. Raynard , M. Lounsbury , & R. Greenwood 2013. Legacies of logics: Sources of community variation in CSR implementation in China. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations: Institutional logics in action, 39: 243276. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

K. Sahlin , & L. Wedlin 2008. Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood , C. Oliver , K. Sahlin , & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 218242. Los Angeles: Sage.

G. See 2009. Harmonious society and Chinese CSR: Is there really a link? Journal of Business Ethics, 89 (1): 122.

D. Strang , & J. Meyer 1993. Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22 (4): 487511.

N. Subramaniam , M. Kansal , & S. Babu 2015. Governance of mandated corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Indian government-owned firms. Journal of Business Ethics, doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2804-0

A. Toppinen , V. Hänninen , & K. Lähtinen 2015. ISO 26000 in the assessment of CSR communication quality: CEO letters and social media in the global pulp and paper industry. Social Responsibility Journal, 11 (4): 702715.

J. Wang 2009. Global-market building as state building: China's entry into the WTO and market reforms of China's tobacco industry. Theory and Society, 38 (2): 165194.

J. D. Westphal , R. Gulati , & S. M. Shortell 1997. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (2): 366394.

J. Yin , & Y. Zhang , 2012. Institutional dynamics and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in an emerging country context: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 111 (2): 301316.

M. Zhao 2012. CSR-based political legitimacy strategy: Managing the state by doing good in China and Russia. Journal of Business Ethics, 111 (4): 439460.

Q. Zheng , Y. Luo , & V. Maksimov 2015. Achieving legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: The case of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 50 (3): 389403.

Q. Zhu , H. Yin , J. Liu , & K. H. Lai 2014. How is employee perception of organizational efforts in corporate social responsibility related to their satisfaction and loyalty towards developing harmonious society in Chinese enterprises? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21 (1): 2840.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Management and Organization Review
  • ISSN: 1740-8776
  • EISSN: 1740-8784
  • URL: /core/journals/management-and-organization-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 100 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 115 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 4th April 2017 - 28th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.