Skip to main content
×
Home

Toward a Chance Management View of Organizational Change

  • Runtian Jing (a1) and Andrew H. Van de Ven (a2)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Chance serves as the gate to organizational change. Based on a relational view of chance, we propose that in an organizational context, the chance to change is affected by the perceptions of change agents and the affordance of situational momentum, and that different time points of change are associated with different degrees of chance favorability. We develop a theoretical model to represent how change agents can assess the favorability of current and future momentum and how they can benefit from identifying a perceived chance by employing chance grasping, entraining, creating, or riding strategy to promote organizational change. We generate theoretical propositions to illustrate the four timing strategies of chance management. The overall contribution of this study is a chance management view of organizational change that considers change agents and situational momentum as two interdependent factors in the process of managing the chance to change.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Runtian Jing (rtjing@sjtu.edu.cn)
References
Hide All
Alvarez S. A., & Barney J. B. 2010. Entrepreneurship and epistemology: The philosophical underpinnings of the study of entrepreneurial opportunities. Academy of Management Annals, 4 (1): 557583.
Ancona D., & Chong C. L. 1996. Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18: 251284.
Argyris C. 1997. Initiating change that perseveres. American Behavioral Scientist, 40 (3): 299309.
Bandura A. 2005. The evolution of social cognitive theory. In Smith K. G. & Hitt M. A. (Eds.), Great minds in management: 935. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baron R. A. 2006. Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs ‘connect the dots’ to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20 (1): 104119.
Baum J. A. C., & Shipilov A. V. 2006. Ecological approaches to organizations. In Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B., & Nord W. R. (Eds.), Sage handbook for organization studies: 55110. London: Sage.
Benford R. D., & Snow D. A. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611639.
Brown S. L., & Eisenhardt K. M. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1): 134.
Burnes B. 2011. Introduction: Why does change fail and what can we do about it? Journal of Change Management, 11 (4): 445450.
Burnes B. 2004. Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41 (6): 9771002.
Castrogiovanni G. J. 1991. Environmental munificence: A theoretical assessment. Academy of Management Review, 16 (3): 542565.
Denrell J., Fang C., & Liu C. 2015. Chance explanations in the management sciences. Organization Science, 26 (3): 923940.
Gaglio C. M. 2004. The role of mental simulations and counterfactual thinking in the opportunity identification process. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice, 28 (6): 533552.
Gawain S. 1982. Creative visualization. New York: Bantam.
Gersick C. J. G. 1994. Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (1): 945.
Gibson J. J. 1954. The visual perception of objective motion and subjective movement. Psychological Review, 61 (5): 304314.
Gibson J. J. 1977. The theory of affordances. In Shaw R. & Bransford J. (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology: 6782. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gilbert C. G. 2005. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (5): 741763.
Glasner D. 1997. Business cycles and depressions. New York: Garland Publishing Company.
Gollwitzer P. M. 1999. Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54 (7): 493503.
Greeno J. G. 1994. Gibson's affordances. Psychological Review, 101 (2): 336342.
Hannan M. T., & Freeman J. H. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49 (2): 149164.
Hegel G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of spirit (trans. Miller A. V.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Huy Q. N. 2001. Time, temporal capability, and planned change. Academy of Management Review, 26 (4): 601623.
Jiang Y., Jackson S. E., & Colakoglu S. 2016. An empirical examination of personal learning within the context of teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37 (5): 654672.
Jing R., & Van de Ven A. H. 2014. A ‘Yin-yang’ model of organizational change: The case of Chengdu Bus Group. Management and Organization Review, 10 (1): 2954.
Jing R. T., Xie J. L., & Ning J. 2014. Commitment to organizational change in a Chinese context. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29 (8): 10981114.
Johns G. 2006. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31 (2): 386408.
Jullien F. 2004. A treatise on efficacy: Between western and Chinese thinking (trans. Janet Lloyd). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Kirzner I. M. 1989. Discovery, capitalism, and distributive justice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Kotter J. P. 1990. What leaders really do. Harvard Business Review, 68 (3): 103111.
Lewin K. 1951. Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (Cartwright D., Ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
Lieberman M. B., & Montgomery D. B. 1998. First-mover (dis) advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (12): 11111125.
Lu X. H. 2012. Shiyi Pan: An opportunist (in Chinese). The Twenty-First Century, 6: 7477.
Mintzberg H. 1987. Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65 (4): 6675.
Oatley K., & Goodwin B. C. 1971. Explanation and investigation of biological rhythms. In Colquhain W. P. (Ed.), Biological rhythms and human performance. New York: Academic.
Orlikowski W. J., & Yates J. 2002. It's about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science, 13 (6): 684700.
Perez-Nordtvedt L., Payne G. T., Short J. C., & Kedia B. L. 2008. An entrainment-based model of temporal organizational fit, misfit, and performance. Organization Science, 19 (5): 785801.
Pettigrew A. M. 2012. Context and action in the transformation of the firm: A reprise. Journal of Management Studies, 49 (7): 13041328.
Pfeffer J., & Salancik G. R. 2003. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Piderit S. K. 2000. Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25 (4): 783794.
Romanelli E., & Tushman M. L. 1994. Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (5): 11411166.
Rousseau D. M., & Tijoriwala S. A. 1999. What's a good reason to change? Motivated reasoning and social accounts in promoting organizational change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (4): 514528.
Sakakibara S., Flynn B. B., Schroeder R. G., & Morris W. T. 1997. The impact of just-in-time manufacturing and its infrastructure on manufacturing performance. Management Science, 43 (9): 2461257.
Sarasvathy S. D. 2001. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26 (2): 243263.
Shang W. X., & Liu L. M. 2011. Promised delivery time and capacity games in time-based competition. Management Science, 57 (3): 599610.
Siggelkow N. 2001. Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4): 838857.
Sloan A. 1964. My years with General Motors. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company.
Staudenmayer N., Tyre M., & Perlow L. 2002. Time to change: Temporal shifts as enablers of organizational change. Organization Science, 13 (5): 583597.
Tsang E. W. K. 2004. Toward a scientific inquiry into superstitious business decision-making. Organization Studies, 25 (6): 923946.
Van de Ven A. H., & Jing R. 2012. Indigenous management research in China from an engaged scholarship perspective. Management and Organization Review, 8 (1): 123137.
Van de Ven A. H., Polley D. E., Garud R., & Venkataraman S. 1999. The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van de Ven A. H., & Poole M. S. 1995. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3): 510540.
Venkataraman S. 2003. Foreword . In Shane S. (Ed.), A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus: xixii. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
von Franz M. L. 1980. On divination and synchronicity: The psychology of meaningful chance. Toronto, CA: Inner City Books.
Zhang X. J., Fu P. P., Xi Y. M., Li L., Xu L. G., Cao C. H., Li G. Q., Ma L., & Ge J. 2012. Understanding indigenous leadership research: Explication and Chinese examples. Leadership Quarterly, 23 (6): 10631079.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Management and Organization Review
  • ISSN: 1740-8776
  • EISSN: 1740-8784
  • URL: /core/journals/management-and-organization-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 29 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 133 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th November 2017 - 11th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.