Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:51:29.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding the ‘Enigma’ of Chinese Firm Performance: Confucius and Beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2016

Daniel Shapiro  and
Jing Li
Daniel Shapiro
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, Canada
Jing Li*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Jing Li (jingli@sfu.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

McCarthy, Dolfsma, and Weitzel (2016) raise the important and interesting question of why what the authors refer to as Confucian acquirers, and in particular Chinese acquirers, tended to create value over the last decade relative to Western companies. The analysis by McCarthy et al. (2016), while restricted to an empirical examination of mergers and acquisitions, calls into question the general relevance and validity of standard, Western-based economic and strategic thinking, and calls for further research into the nature of Chinese and Confucian thought and the degree to which they contribute to our understanding of merger outcomes in China, and perhaps elsewhere. At the most general level, McCarthy et al. (2016) challenge us to consider the question of whether different conceptual foundations are necessary to understand the behaviour and performance of Chinese and other Asian firms. At the heart of this question is the issue of whether there are unique country effects, or group-of-country effects, that determine to a substantial degree firm performance, and if so, what is the nature of these effects?

Type
Commentaries
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 259 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. 2005. Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In Aghion, P. & Durlauf, S. N. (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth: 385–472. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K. A., & Kabbach-Castro, L. R. 2012. Perspectives on comparative corporate governance. In Clarke, T. & Branson, D. (Eds.), Sage handbook of corporate governance. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K., Bednar, M. K., & Lee, J. H. 2015. Connecting the dots – bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. The Academy of Management Annals, 9 (1): 483–573.Google Scholar
Ahern, K., Daminelli, D., & Fracassi, M. 2015. Lost in translation? The effect of cultural values on mergers around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 117 (1): 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A., & Eckard, E. W. 1998. Are mega-mergers anticompetitive? Evidence from the first great merger wave. Rand Journal of Economics, 29 (4): 803–827.Google Scholar
Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E. R., Heugens, P., van Essen, M., & van Oosterhout, J. H. 2011. Business group affiliation, performance, context, and strategy: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 54 (3): 437–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E., & Yang, X. 2009. Varieties of Asian capitalism: Toward an institutional theory of Asian enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26 (3): 361–380.Google Scholar
Chen, V. Z., Li, J., & Shapiro, D. M. 2011. Are OECD-prescribed ‘good corporate governance practices’ really good in an emerging economy? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28 (1): 115–138.Google Scholar
Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. C. 2007. How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: A study of CEO effects in three countries. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (8): 767–789.Google Scholar
Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. C. 2011. Differences in managerial discretion across countries: How nation-level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (8): 797–819.Google Scholar
Deloitte. 2015. The Deloitte M&A Index, H1 2015.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H., Kim, C., & Park, D. 2008. Old wine in new bottles: A comparison of emerging-market TNCs today and developed-country TNCs thirty years ago. In Sauvant, K. P. (Ed.), The rise of transnational corporations from emerging markets: Threat or opportunity?: 158–180. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. 2008. Multinational enterprises and the global economy (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Estrin, S., & Prevezer, M. 2011. The role of informal institutions in corporate governance: Brazil, Russia, India, and China compared. Asia Pacific Management Journal, 28 (1): 41–67.Google Scholar
García-Castro, R., Aguilera, R. V., & Ariño, M. A. 2013. Bundles of firm corporate governance practices: A fuzzy set analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21 (4): 390–407.Google Scholar
Haleblian, J., Devers, C., McNamar, G., Carpenter, M., & Davison, R. 2009. Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35 (1): 469–502.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Lee, H. U., Yucel, E. 2002. The importance of social capital to the management of multinational enterprise: Relational networks among Asian and western firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19 (2–3): 353–372.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. 2007. Asian management in the 21st Century. Asian Pacific Journal of Management, 24 (4): 411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JuriGlobe, Univeristy of Ottawa, http://www.juriglobe.ca/eng/sys-juri/index-alpha.php Google Scholar
Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. 2007. Business groups in emerging markets: Paragons or parasites? Journal of Economic Literature, 45 (2): 331–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review: 41–51.Google Scholar
Kumar, N. 2009. How emerging giants are rewriting the rules of M&A. Harvard Business Review, May: 115–121.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52 (3): 1131–1150.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6): 1113–1155.Google Scholar
Leung, K., & Morris, M. 2015. Values, schemas, and norms in the culture-behavior nexus: A situated dynamics framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 46 (9): 1028–1050.Google Scholar
Luo, Y., Huang, Y., & Wang, S. L. 2011. Guanxi and organisational performance: A meta-analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8 (1): 139–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, D. 2011. Law and economy in traditional China: A ‘legal origin’ perspective on the great divergence. In Ma, D. & Luiten van Zanden, J. (Eds.), Law and long-term economic change: A Eurasian perspective: 46–67. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. J., Dolfsma, W., & Weitzel, U. 2016. The first global merger wave and the enigma of Chinese performance. Management and Organization Review, 12 (2): 221–248.Google Scholar
Makino, S., Isobe, T., & Chan, C. M. 2004. Does country matter? Strategic Management Journal, 25 (10): 1027–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, L., & Goo, S. H. 2013. Corporate governance in Asian countries: Has Confucianism anything to offer? Business & Society Review, 118 (1): 23–45.Google Scholar
Millar, C. C. J. M., Eldomiaty, T. I., Choi, C. J., & Hilton, B. 2005. Corporate governance and institutional transparency in emerging markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 59 (1): 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, J., Jullens, J., & Krings, J. 2015. Deals that win. Strategy + Business, 80 (Autumn): 50–59.Google Scholar
Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. 2014. Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57 (6): 1681–1705.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. 2002. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128 (1): 3–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sehgal, V., Reinboth, J., & Hirsh, E. 2015. The new geography of M&A. Strategy + Business, 80 (Autumn): 9–11.Google Scholar
WIPO. 2013. Customary Law, Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property: An Outline Of The Issues. World Intellectual Property Organization.Google Scholar
World Values Survey, WVS Wave 6 (2010-2014). Available from URL: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp Google Scholar
Yueh, L. 2011. Enterprising China: Business, economic, and legal developments since 1979. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar