Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T08:33:01.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XPS Study of Oxygen Adsorption on (3×3) Reconstructed MBE Grown Gan Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Abstract

The incorporation of oxygen onto the (3×3) reconstructed surface of GaN(0001) has been studied using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). It was found that the (3×3) reconstruction corresponds to a fractional Ga adlayer atop a Ga terminated GaN surface. Our measurements indicate a surface coverage of 1.15 ± 0.2 monolayers of relaxed Ga on the surface. The binding energy separation between the relaxed surface Ga3d core level and bulk Ga3d level was measured to be 1.1 ± 0.1 eV. A metallic component extending from the bulk GaN valence band maximum out to 0 eV was also present in the XPS spectrum. The separation between the bulk valence band maximum and the Fermi level of the metallic component was found to be 2.1 ± 0.1 eV. The relaxation of the surface Ga was found to decrease with oxygen exposure indicating Ga-O bonding, with oxygen adsorption terminating at 1.3 ± 0.2 monolayers. The O1s core level was found to have a FWHM of 2.0 ± 0.1 eV.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Materials Research Society

Introduction

Wide band gap semiconductors have attracted considerable attention for applications ranging from lasers to high power electronics. In the last few years, substantial improvement in the structural and electronic properties of GaN has been achieved. This has resulted in major advances in blue-green light-emitting diodes and lasers as well as HFET power devices. The performance of these devices, however, is still limited by a number of materials problems as well as difficulties in producing low resistance contacts. This is particularly true of p-type GaN where extremely high doping densities are required to produce p-type material. Reasonably good ohmic contacts to n-GaN have been found, and the interface chemistry of these contacts investigated. [Reference Wu and Kahn1] The effects of adsorbates on Fermi-level pinning and Schottky barrier heights, however, is not well understood. A study of the (1×1) GaN surface has shown an increase in electron affinity of ∼0.58 eV due to oxygen chemisorption. [Reference Bermudez2] These types of surface effects have strong implications for device fabrication. We report here a study of the (3×3) reconstructed surface of GaN(0001) including effects due to oxidation.

Experiment

GaN was grown on sapphire (0001) substrates by RF assisted molecular beam epitaxy using a low temperature GaN buffer layer. The substrate temperature was held at 800°C during growth under slightly metal-rich conditions. The surface morphology and reconstruction were characterized by reflection high energy electron diffraction (RHEED). The RHEED pattern was streaky during growth, and showed a clear (3×3) reconstruction after cool down. The (3×3) reconstruction has been determined to correspond to N-polar GaN. [Reference Smith, Feenstra, Greve, Neugebauer and Northrup3] Nitrogen polarity corresponds to a crystal structure in which the bond parallel to the c-axis is from a nitrogen to a gallium atom, and results in a Ga terminated surface having three dangling bonds. The polarity of our sample was confirmed after data acquisition ex-situ by etching in molten KOH. [Reference Seelmann-Eggebert, Weyher, Obloh, Zimmermann, Rar and Porowski7] After growth, the samples were moved under vacuum to an XPS chamber via a UHV transfer tube. Data was then taken over 4 regions of interest: the Ga3d core level, N1s core level, O1s core level, and the valence band region. Data acquisition was alternated with in-place exposure to O2 at room temperature via a leak valve. The sample is in line of sight of a hot filament and the oxygen can therefore be considered excited. Oxygen exposure was measured by monitoring system pressure, and is given in Langmuirs (L), were 1L=10−6Torr s.

Analysis

Several trends were detected in the XPS spectra during oxidation of the (3×3) surface. It was found that the (3×3) reconstruction of the GaN surface results in a second peak on the lower binding energy side of the bulk Ga3d peak in GaN (Fig.1a). The shift to lower binding energy is characteristic of metallic bonding between Ga atoms. This implies that the reconstruction corresponds to a fractional Ga adlayer atop a Ga terminated GaN surface. This is in agreement with a previous in-situ STM study of GaN reconstructions.[Reference Smith, Feenstra, Greve, Neugebauer and Northrup3] The Ga3d spectrum was fit to determine the relaxed Ga coverage of the surface. Figure 1a shows the results of a fit employing three peaks, one for each state of Ga, and one for the N2s state that lies at ∼17 eV. Each Ga peak was fit by two identical spin-orbit split doublets consisting of the sum of a Lorentzian and Gaussian. The splitting was held at .46 eV and the branching ratio was set at .66. A Gaussian was used for the N2s peak. A good fit was obtained over most of the peak area with the largest error occurring on the high binding energy side of the Ga3d peak. This may be due to the asymmetric nature of photoemission from metallic core peaks, or possibly some residual inversion domains within the sample. Reference 2 found growth of a similarly positioned state with oxygen exposure on a (1×1) reconstructed surface of GaN. We, however, did not observe any growth of this state with oxygen exposure, and therefore are hesitant to ascribe it to O-Ga bonding. The effect of this error on determination of surface coverage should be minimal given the small area of the error. From this fit, the ratio of the bulk to metallic Ga3d peak areas was found to be 4.35±0.2. For calculating the surface coverage, we begin by assuming the measured intensity from a given core level of a single layer of atoms m monolayers below the surface (Im ) can be described by,

(1)

where σ is the sensitivity factor for the given material and core level, [8] and I is an instrumental scale factor depending on primary beam current, detection efficiency, etc. The inelastic mean free path (IMFP) for electrons with energy E, is denoted by λ(E), and is expressed in atomic layers. The collection angle measured from the surface normal (α) was set at 45° for this study. We designate Io Ga3d Ga3dI as the measured Ga3d peak intensity of a single monolayer of Ga on the surface. The measured intensities of the relaxed surface Ga3d and bulk Ga3d peaks can then be expressed by,

(2)
(3)

Figure 1: a) XPS spectrum of Ga3d area showing relaxed Ga side peak and corresponding fit. b) Spectra showing metallic Ga3d peak removal by oxygen exposure.

Here, χ is the fractional surface coverage of relaxed Ga. By taking the ratio of these intensities, and solving for χ, an expression for the fraction of relaxed surface Ga can be obtained.

(4)

In eqn. 4, βis the ratio of surface to bulk peak intensities (1/4.35 in our measurements). Although the IMFP for GaN has not been measured, an estimate was obtained from a compilation of previous IMFP measurements. [Reference Seah and Dench4] We have used a value of 8.0 monolayers for the IMFP for 1467eV electrons from the Ga3d region, where one monolayer is the distance between Ga planes in the crystal. Using the above values for β, λ, and α, eqn. 4 results in 1.15±0.2 monolayers for the calculated surface coverage. This is larger than the expected fractional surface coverage assumed in the above model. Accounting for this excess surface coverage results in a value of 1.19±0.2 monolayers. Although there is some uncertainty introduced by the lack of a measured IMFP for GaN, it appears safe to conclude that the surface consists of ∼1 monolayer of relaxed Ga. The (3×3) reconstruction has been found to consist of Ga adatoms positioned in three fold coordinated sites above a Ga termination layer. STM images show the Ga adatom positioned just above the valley between three Ga atoms in the termination layer.[Reference Smith, Feenstra, Greve, Neugebauer and Northrup3] Although Ga droplets can not be conclusively ruled out, our data indicates that the entire Ga termination layer is relaxed by the addition of this .11 monolayers of Ga adatoms.

The Ga3d metallic peak intensity decreases with oxygen adsorption indicating bonding between the Ga and oxygen. The valence band density of states (VBDOS) spectrum has the shape and position of the bulk GaN VBDOS with an additional component extending to 0 eV (Fig.2). The VBDOS metallic component also decreases in intensity as the sample is exposed to O2. This component is therefore associated with the metallic nature of the reconstructed surface. Using a linear extrapolation to estimate the position of the GaN valence band and the half height position of the metallic Fermi edge (EF) results in EF-VBM =2.1 ± 0.2eV. This is in agreement with an oxygen adsorption study of the (1×1) surface by Bermudez [Reference Bermudez2] in which they measured EF-VBM = 2.4 ±0.2 eV. The O1s/Ga3d peak area ratio was measured as a function of oxygen exposure. The O1s peak position is seen to shift to higher binding energy relative to the GaLMM peak as oxygen exposure increases.(Fig.3a) This may indicate two states closely spaced in energy for oxygen adsorption. The two states may be due to the difference between binding to the Ga termination layer versus binding to the Ga adlayer. The oxidation was found to terminate with an O1s to Ga3d peak area ratio of 0.43 ± 0.1, corresponding to an oxygen surface coverage of 1.3 ±0.2 monolayers. This is much too high for simple adatom binding, therefore the Ga termination layer must participate in the oxidation. The saturation oxygen level suggests a single oxygen for each termination layer Ga atom, with additional coverage due to bonding with adatoms. The O1s peak was fit by a Gaussian and was found to have a FWHM of 2.0 ±0.1 eV before deconvolution of the instrumental broadening. This is significantly smaller than the 3.2 eV FWHM measured in [Reference Bermudez2] for the oxygen adsorption onto (1×1) GaN surfaces.

Figure 2: XPS spectrum of GaN valence band showing metallic ledge removal by oxidation.

Figure 3: a) XPS spectrums showing oxygen 1s peak growth with oxygen exposure. b) O1s to Ga3d peak area ratio as a function of exposure.

Conclusion

In summary, we have studied the (3×3) reconstruction of MBE grown GaN using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. We have characterized surface binding energy changes, and investigated the surface reaction with oxygen exposure. We have found a Ga3d surface binding energy change of 1.1 ± 0.1 eV and a metallic Ga adlayer Fermi-level to bulk valence band maximum separation of 2.1 ± 0.2 eV. We have observed the removal of surface relaxation by oxygen exposure and interpreted this as bonding of the surface Ga termination layer and adlayer with oxygen. The width of the O1s peak was found to be smaller for the (3×3) surface than that previously measured for the (1×1) surface.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by DARPA and monitored by the ONR under Grant N00014-92-J-1845.

Footnotes

MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. 4S1, G6.26 (1999)

References

Wu, C.I. and Kahn, A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16(4) 2218 (1998)Google Scholar
Bermudez, V.M., J. Appl. Phys. 80 (2) 1190 (1996)Google Scholar
Smith, A.R., Feenstra, R.M., Greve, D.W., Neugebauer, J., and Northrup, J.E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (20)3934 (1997)Google Scholar
Seah, M.P. and Dench, W.A., Surf. Int. Anal. 1, 2 (1979)Google Scholar
Sung, M.M., Ahn, J., Bykov, V., and Rabalais, J.W., Phys. Rev. B 54(20) 14652 (1996)Google Scholar
Xu, Y.N. and Ching, W.Y., Phys. Rev. B 48, 4335 (1993)Google Scholar
Seelmann-Eggebert, M., Weyher, J. L., Obloh, H., Zimmermann, H., Rar, A., and Porowski, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2635 (1997).Google Scholar
Physical Electronics, Multipak Operator’s Manual, (1996)Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1: a) XPS spectrum of Ga3d area showing relaxed Ga side peak and corresponding fit. b) Spectra showing metallic Ga3d peak removal by oxygen exposure.

Figure 1

Figure 2: XPS spectrum of GaN valence band showing metallic ledge removal by oxidation.

Figure 2

Figure 3: a) XPS spectrums showing oxygen 1s peak growth with oxygen exposure. b) O1s to Ga3d peak area ratio as a function of exposure.