Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T11:00:48.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why calculus cannot be made easy†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2016

R. L. E. Schwarzenberger
R. L. E. Schwarzenberger*
Affiliation:
Mathematics Education Research Centre, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Calculus made easy by “F.R.S.” was published seventy years ago. Its anonymous author wrote explicitly for engineering students rather than for future mathematics teachers. He ended by asking those who had enjoyed the book “not to give the author away nor to tell the mathematicians what a fool he really is”.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Mathematical Gazette , Volume 64 , Issue 429 , October 1980 , pp. 158 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Mathematical Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

This article is based on a lecture given at the Annual Conference of the Mathematical Association in Durham, April 1980.

References

Shuard, H. B. and Neill, H., From graphs to calculus (The mathematics curriculum: a critical review). Blackie, for the Schools Council (1977).Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, R. L. E. and Tall, D. O., Conflicts in the learning of real numbers and limits, Math. Teaching 83, 44–49 (March 1978).Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, R. L. E., The impact of non-standard analysis on school calculus, Math. Education for Teaching 3, 3–12 (January 1978).Google Scholar
Tall, D. O., The calculus of Leibniz—an alternative modern approach, Math. Intelligencer 2, 54–55 (1979).Google Scholar
Tall, D. O., Looking at graphs through infinitesimal microscopes, windows and telescopes, Mathl Gaz. 64, 22–49 (No. 427, March 1980).Google Scholar
Skemp, R. R., Relational understanding and instrumental understanding, Math. Teaching 77, 20–26 (December 1976).Google Scholar
Byers, V. and Herscovics, N., Understanding school mathematics, Math. Teaching 81, 24–27 (December 1977).Google Scholar
Skemp, R. R., Goals of learning and qualities of understanding, Math. Teaching 88, 44–49 (September 1979).Google Scholar