Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-10T18:25:29.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analytic functions having distributional boundary values in W′-spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. S. Pathak
R. S. Pathak
Affiliation:
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is shown that the functions which are analytic in tubular radial domains and satisfy certain growth conditions have distributional boundary values in the weak topology of (WΩ)′-space. Representation of analytic functions in terms of distributional boundary values are given. Converse results are also obtained. An analytic decomposition theorem is proved. The main theorems are established by means of a number of lemmas concerning WM, WΩ spaces and their dual spaces. Several new lemmas are proved for K{Mp} spaces from which results for WM-spaces can be easily deduced.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 87 , Issue 2 , March 1980 , pp. 227 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bochner, S. and Martin, W. T.Several complex variables (Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 1948).Google Scholar
(2)Bremermann, H. J.Distributions, complex variables, and Fourier transforms (Addison-Wesley, 1965).Google Scholar
(3)Carmichael, R. D.Distributional boundary values of functions analytic in tubular radial domains. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 20 (1971), 843–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Carmichael, R. D.Distributions of exponential growth and their Fourier transforms. Duke Math. J. 40 (1973), 765–783.Google Scholar
(5)Carmicbael, R. D. and Milton, E. O.Distributional boundary values in the dual spaces of type Pacific J. Math. 56 (1975), 385–422.Google Scholar
(6)Constantinescu, F.Analytic properties of nonstrictly localizable fields. J. Mathematical Phys 12 (1971), 293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Edwards, R. E.Functional analysis (New York, Holt, Rinehart. and Winston, 1965).Google Scholar
(8)Gel'fand, I. M. and Shiilov, G. E.Generalized Functions, vol. 2 (New York, Academic Press, 1968).Google Scholar
(9)Gei'fand, I. M. and Shilov, G. E.Generalized functions, vol. 3 (New York, Academic Press, 1967).Google Scholar
(10)Komatsu, H.Ultra distributions. I. Structure theorems and a characterization. J. Faculty of Sciences, University of Tokyo, section Ia, 20 (1973), 25–105.Google Scholar
(11)Roever, J. W. de. Complex Fourier transformation and analytic functional with un- bounded carriers. Thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1977.Google Scholar
(12)Roever, J. W. de.Analytic representations and Fourier transforms of analytic functionals in Z′ carried by the real space. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 9 (1978), 996–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Schwartz, L.Théorie des distributions (Paris, Hermann, 1966).Google Scholar
(14)Swartz, C.Continuous linear functionals on certain K{Mp} spaces, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 3 (1972), 595–598.Google Scholar
(15)Tillmann, H. G.Darstellung der Schwartschen Distribution durch analytische Funktionen. Math. Z., 77 (1961), 106–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Vladimirov, V. S.Methods of the theory of several complex variables (Cambridge, Mass., M.I.T. Press, 1966).Google Scholar