Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-m259h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-05T21:26:12.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

KMS states for reduced groups, theta functions and the Powers–Størmer construction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

K. C. Hannabuss
K. C. Hannabuss
Affiliation:
Balliol College, Oxford OX1 3BJ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

KMS states of a twisted convolution algebra of Schwartz functions on a vector group are classified and related to KMS states of twisted L1-algebras for certain subquotients. The KMS states for the subquotient algebras are also related to Fock states of vector groups. In the particular case of the subquotient Tn × ℤn of ℚ2n this links the Fock space construction of the theta functions with their appearance in KMS states of loop groups and in the Kac character formula.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 105 , Issue 2 , March 1989 , pp. 397 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Baggett, L. and Kleppner, A.. Multiplier representations of abelian groups. J. Funct. Anal. 14 (1973), 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Carey, A. L. and Hannabuss, K. C.. Temperature states on loop groups, theta functions and the Luttinger model. J. Funct. Anal. 75 (1987), 128–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Carey, A. L. and Hannabuss, K. C.. Temperature states on gauge groups. (Preprint, 1986.)Google Scholar
[4]Cartier, P.. Canonical commutation relations and theta functions. In Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. no. 9 (American Mathematical Society, 1966), pp. 361–383.Google Scholar
[5]Edwards, C. M. and Lewis, J. T.. Twisted group algebras I and II. Comm. Math. Phys. 13 (1969), 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Hannabuss, K. C.. Representations of nilpotent locally compact groups. J. Funct. Anal. 34 (1979), 148–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Hannabuss, K. C.. Characters and contact transformations. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 90 (1981), 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Igusa, J. I.. Theta Functions (Springer-Verlag, 1969).Google Scholar
[9]Kac, V.. Infinite–dimensional Lie Algebras (Cambridge University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Lions, J. L. and Vergne, M.. The Weil Representation, Maslov Index and Theta Series (Birkhäuser-Verlag, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Mackey, G. W.. Unitary representations of group extensions I. Acta Math. 99 (1958), 265–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Mackey, O. W.. Induced representations of locally compact groups and applications. In Functional Analysis and Related Fields (Springer-Verlag, 1970), pp. 132–166.Google Scholar
[13]Powers, R. and Størmer, E.. Free states of the canonical anticommutation relations. Comm. Math. Phys. 16 (1970), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Pressley, A. N. and Segal, O. B.. Loop Groups (Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
[15]Rocca, O., Sirugue, M. and Testard, D.. On a class of equilibrium states under the KMS condition. Comm. Math. Phys. 19 (1970), 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Segal, I. E.. Mathematical Problems of Relativistic Physics (American Mathematical Society, 1963).Google Scholar