Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T08:48:50.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The average number of electrons accompanying a cosmic-ray meson due to collisions of the meson with atomic electrons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

E. J. Williams
Affiliation:
Debartment Of PhysicsUniversity CollegeAberystwyth

Extract

The penetrating component of cosmic radiation is now believed to consist of mesons—particles with a mass about one-tenth of that of a proton—while the soft component is attributed to electrons. By collisions with atomic electrons a fast meson occasionally produces fast secondary electrons, “knock-on” electrons, thus giving rise to a certain amount of the soft component. It was first suggested by Bhabha(1) that fast electrons produced in this way may be responsible for the electron showers known to be associated with the penetrating particles. In the present note we calculate the ratio, which we denote by R, of the average number of electrons which accompany a meson due to the knock-on process, making use of the simplification which results from the fact that the rate of loss of energy by fast electrons in ionization and excitation and also the emission of soft quanta are nearly independent of their energy. In virtue of this, the total length of electron track, and therefore the magnitude of R, is only slightly affected by the cascade process of shower production, a process which causes the energy of a fast electron to be shared among a number of electrons. The difficulties associated with a treatment of the cascade process may therefore be avoided in calculating R.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bhabha, . Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 164 (1938), 257.Google Scholar
(2)Bhabha, and Heitler, . Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 159 (1937), 432.Google Scholar
(3)Williams, . Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 172 (1939), 194.Google Scholar