Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-31T11:29:41.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A counter-example in uniformity theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

A. J. Ward
A. J. Ward
Affiliation:
Emmanuel College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent paper, Smith ((l)), considering a statement or conjecture of Isbell ((2)), proved that the Hausdorff uniformities arising from two different uniformities on the same set must induce different topologies on the ‘hyperspace’ of subsets, except possibly in one case which remained open, namely, when the two given uniformities induce the same proximity and neither is precompact. I now give an example to show that different uniformities can (in this case) induce the same topology on the hyperspace (in the example one of the uniformities is metric). This disproves Isbell's conjecture.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , April 1966 , pp. 207 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

(1)Smith, D. H.Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 62 (1966),CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Isbell, J. R.Uniform spaces (Math. Surveys 12), Amer. Math. Soc. 1964. p. 35. Ex. 17.Google Scholar