Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 763
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Svozil, Karl 2017. Advances in Unconventional Computing.

    Adesso, Gerardo and Simon, R 2016. Strong subadditivity for log-determinant of covariance matrices and its applications. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, Vol. 49, Issue. 34, p. 34LT02.

    Amitai, Ehud Tiwari, Rakesh P. Walter, Stefan Schmidt, Thomas L. and Nigg, Simon E. 2016. Nonlocal quantum state engineering with the Cooper pair splitter beyond the Coulomb blockade regime. Physical Review B, Vol. 93, Issue. 7,

    Arnaud, Ludovic 2016. All possible permutational symmetries of a quantum system. Physical Review A, Vol. 93, Issue. 1,

    Banerjee, Subhashish Alok, Ashutosh Kumar and MacKenzie, Richard 2016. Quantum correlations in B and K meson systems. The European Physical Journal Plus, Vol. 131, Issue. 5,

    Bartkiewicz, Karol Černoch, Antonín Lemr, Karel Miranowicz, Adam and Nori, Franco 2016. Temporal steering and security of quantum key distribution with mutually unbiased bases against individual attacks. Physical Review A, Vol. 93, Issue. 6,

    Bertolotti, Mario 2016. Quantum optics, by John Garrison and Raymond Chiao. Contemporary Physics, Vol. 57, Issue. 3, p. 426.

    Bianchini, Davide and Ravanini, Francesco 2016. Entanglement entropy from corner transfer matrix in Forrester–Baxter non-unitary RSOS models. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, Vol. 49, Issue. 15, p. 154005.

    Brodutch, Aharon and Cohen, Eliahu 2016. Nonlocal Measurements via Quantum Erasure. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 116, Issue. 7,

    Bruns, D. Sperling, J. and Scheel, S. 2016. Witnessing random unitary and projective quantum channels: Complementarity between separable and maximally entangled states. Physical Review A, Vol. 93, Issue. 3,

    Chen, Shin-Liang Budroni, Costantino Liang, Yeong-Cherng and Chen, Yueh-Nan 2016. Natural Framework for Device-Independent Quantification of Quantum Steerability, Measurement Incompatibility, and Self-Testing. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 116, Issue. 24,

    Chiu, Ching-Yi Lambert, Neill Liao, Teh-Lu Nori, Franco and Li, Che-Ming 2016. No-cloning of quantum steering. npj Quantum Information, Vol. 2, p. 16020.

    Chung, Sung Jang 2016. The Science of the Five Elements in the Evolution of Humanity: Primo Vascular System (Bonghan Circulatory System). Open Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 06, Issue. 01, p. 68.

    Costa, A. C. S. and Angelo, R. M. 2016. Quantification of Einstein-Podolski-Rosen steering for two-qubit states. Physical Review A, Vol. 93, Issue. 2,

    Costa, A.C.S. Beims, M.W. and Angelo, R.M. 2016. Generalized discord, entanglement, Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering, and Bell nonlocality in two-qubit systems under (non-)Markovian channels: Hierarchy of quantum resources and chronology of deaths and births. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 461, p. 469.

    D Drummond, Peter and Chaturvedi, Subhash 2016. Quantum simulations in phase-space: from quantum optics to ultra-cold physics. Physica Scripta, Vol. 91, Issue. 7, p. 073007.

    Das, Abhishek 2016. A Logical Approach to Entanglement. International Journal of Theoretical Physics,

    de Peyer, Janine 2016. Uncanny Communication and the Porous Mind. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 156.

    Dossey, Larry 2016. Telecebo: Beyond Placebo to an Expanded Concept of Healing. EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Eberly, J H 2016. Correlation, coherence and context. Laser Physics, Vol. 26, Issue. 8, p. 084004.

  • Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Volume 31, Issue 4
  • October 1935, pp. 555-563

Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems


The probability relations which can occur between two separated physical systems are discussed, on the assumption that their state is known by a representative in common. The two families of observables, relating to the first and to the second system respectively, are linked by at least one match between two definite members, one of either family. The word match is short for stating that the values of the two observables in question determine each other uniquely and therefore (since the actual labelling is irrelevant) can be taken to be equal. In general there is but one match, but there can be more. If, in addition to the first match, there is a second one between canonical conjugates of the first mates, then there are infinitely many matches, every function of the first canonical pair matching with the same function of the second canonical pair. Thus there is a complete one-to-one correspondence between those two branches (of the two families of observables) which relate to the two degrees of freedom in question. If there are no others, the one-to-one correspondence persists as time advances, but the observables of the first system (say) change their mates in the way that the latter, i.e. the observables of the second system, undergo a certain continuous contact-transformation.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Einstein B. Podolsky and N. Rosen , Phys. Rev. 47 (1935), 777.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • ISSN: 0305-0041
  • EISSN: 1469-8064
  • URL: /core/journals/mathematical-proceedings-of-the-cambridge-philosophical-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *