Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:06:38.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GENERIC REVISION OF PHORIDAE OF THE NEARCTIC REGION AND PHYLOGENETIC CLASSIFICATION OF PHORIDAE, SCIADOCERIDAE, AND IRONOMYIIDAE (DIPTERA: PHORIDEA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Brian V. Brown
Get access

Abstract

The Nearctic Region genera of Phoridae are revised, and it is shown that the current classification into three subfamilies is inadequate. The hypothesis that the most closely related taxa to the Phoridae are the Sciadoceridae and Ironomyiidae is supported. Use of these outgroups to polarize character states in the Phoridae allows the reorganization of this family into five subfamilies: Hypocerinae, Phorinae, Aenigmatiinae, Conicerinae, and Metopininae. The newly re-defined Phorinae is the adelphotaxon (sister-group) of the Aenigmatiinae + Conicerinae + Metopininae, among which the relationships are unresolved. The hypocerines are the adelphotaxon of all other extant Phoridae. Within the Hypocerinae the relationships of the 15 included world genera are hypothesized, and three new genera are proposed. The relationships of the eight world phorine genera are only partly resolved. The Aenigmatiinae is organized into two tribes: Aenigmatiini and Diplonevrini. The relationships of the seven world genera of Diplonevrini are hypothesized, whereas those of the Aenigmatiini are not discussed. The six world conicerine genera are revised and their relationships hypothesized. In the Metopininae, two major groups are recognized, the Metopina-group and the Megaselia-group. Beckerina Malloch is the adelphotaxon of these two groups, whereas Rhopica Schmitz and Triphleba Rondani are successive outgroups of all metopinines. The Metopina-group is mostly tropical in distribution and is not discussed further. The Megaselia-group is partially organized into the Gymnophora-subgroup and the Apocephalus-subgroup. Species-level revisions of genera are needed before further progress can be made in this family, because the distribution of character states is insufficiently known. Genera in great need of revision include Peromitra Enderlein, Chaetopleurophora Schmitz, Megaselia Rondani, and Apocephalus Coquillett.

Résumé

Les genres de Phoridae de la région néarctique ont fait l'objet d'une révision au cours de laquelle il s'est avéré que la classification classique en trois sous-familles n'était pas adéquate. L'hypothèse selon laquelle les Sciadoceridae et les Ironomyiidae constituent les taxons les plus apparentés des Phoridae a pu être vérifiée. L'utilisation de ces groupes externes pour établir les caractères des Phoridae a permis de réorganiser la famille en cinq sous-familles : les Hypocerinae, les Phorinae, les Aenigmatiinae, les Conicerinae et les Metopininae. Les Phorinae, tels que redéfinis ici, constituent l'adelphotaxon (groupe-soeur) des Aenigmatiinae + Conicerinae + Metopininae, entre lesquels les relations n'ont pu être clarifiées. Les Hypocerinae forment l'adelphotaxon de tous les autres Phoridae actuels. Chez les Hypocerinae, les relations entre les 15 genres mondiauz inclus ici font l'objet d'une hypothèse et trois nouveaux genres sont proposés. Les relations entre les huit genres mondiaux de Phorinae ne peuvent être que partiellement clarifiées. Les Aenigmatiinae sont organisés en deux tribus : les Aenigmatiini et les Diplonevrini. Une hypothèse est proposée au sujet des relations entre les sept genres mondiaux de Diplonevrini, mais chez les Aenigmatiini les relations ne sont pas définies. Les six genres de Conicerinae sont révisés les relations entre eux sont examinées. Chez les Metopininae, deux groupes principaux sont reconnus : le groupe Metopina et le groupe Megaselia. Beckerina Malloch est l'adelphotaxon de ces deux groupes, alors que Rhopica Schmitz et Triphleba Rondani sont des groupes externes successifs de tous les Metopininae. Le groupe Metopina a une répartition surtout tropicale et il n'est pas étudié ici. Le groupe Megaselia est partiellement organisé en deux sous-groupes, le sous-groupe Gymnophora et le sous-groupe Apocephalus. Des révisions au niveau spécifique s'imposent pour qu'il soit possible de comprendre davantage les relations au sein de la famille, car la répartition des caractères n'est pas suffisamment connue. Les genres suivants nécessitent une révision majeure : Peromitra Enderlein, Chaetopleurophora Schmitz, Megaselia Rondani et Apocephalus Coquillett. [Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Research Article
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 124 , Supplement S164 , 1992 , pp. 3 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achterberg, C. van, and Bin, F.. 1981. Notes on two species of Dinotrema Foerster (Hym., Braconidae, Alysiinae) with observations on the hymenopterous parasite-complex of Spiniphora dorsalis Becker (Dipt., Phoridae) in dead Helix spp. (Mollusca). Ent. Ber., Amst. 41: 104–112.Google Scholar
Annandale, N. 1912. Description of a micropterous fly of the family Phoridae associated with ants. Spolia zeylan. 8: 85–89.Google Scholar
Ax, P. 1987. The Phylogenetic System: The Systematization of Living Organisms on the Basis of their Phylogenesis. John Wiley & Sons, London, xiii + 340 pp.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1911. A curious habit of one of our phorid flies. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 13: 212–214.Google Scholar
Barnes, J.K. 1990 a. First record of genus Phymatopterella in the Nearctic Region and description of P. ovatimacula, a new humpbacked fly from Florida (Diptera: Phoridae). Fla. Ent. 73: 644–649.Google Scholar
Barnes, J.K. 1990 b. Life history of Dohrniphora cornuta (Bigot) (Diptera: Phoridae), a filth-inhabiting humpbacked fly. Jl. N. Y. ent. Soc. 98: 474–483.Google Scholar
Barnes, J.K. 1991. Taxonomic status of the Nearctic species of Auxanommatidia Borgmeier (Diptera: Phoridae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 93: 930–932.Google Scholar
Baumann, E. 1977. Untersuchungen über die Dipterenfauna subterraner Gangsysteme und nester von Wühlmäusen (Microtus, Clethrionomys) auf Wiesen der montanen Region im Naturpark Hoher Vogelsberg. Zool. Jb. Abt. Syst. Oekol. Geogr. 104: 368–414.Google Scholar
Baumann, E. 1978 a. Phorinae (Phoridae/Diptera Rennfliegen) als Blütenbesucher auf Doldengewächsen (Umbelliferae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 130: 43–52.Google Scholar
Baumann, E. 1978 b. Rennfliegen (Diptera: Phoridae) als Blütenbesucher. Kritische Sichtung der Lituratur. Flora. 167: 301–314.Google Scholar
Baumann, E. 1979. Rennfliegen aus den Auenwäldern des Naturschutzgebietes “Hördter Rheinaue”. II. Die Gattung Gymnophora mit Anmerkungen zur Systematik und Biologie (Diptera: Phoridae). Mitt. Pollichia. 67: 184–193.Google Scholar
Becker, T. 1901. Die Phoriden. Abh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wein. 1: 1–100.Google Scholar
Benner, D.B., and Curtis, S.K.. 1988. Internal reproductive organs of the female humpbacked fly, Megaselia scalaris Loew (Diptera: Phoridae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. & Embryol. 17: 197–205.Google Scholar
Berland, L. 1932. Sur le parasitisme des phorides. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr. 57: 529–530.Google Scholar
Beyer, E.M. 1958 a. Bermerkungen ueber zwei exotische Phoriden. Brotéria. 27: 121–123.Google Scholar
Beyer, E.M. 1958 b. Die ersten Phoriden von Burma (Dipt.Phor.). Soc. Sci. Fenn. Comm. Biol. 18: 1–72.Google Scholar
Beyer, E.M. 1959 a. Gattung Pericyclocera Schmitz in Ostasien (Dipt. Phoridae). Ent. Z. 69: 167–169.Google Scholar
Beyer, E.M. 1959 b. Neue Phoriden aus Tanganyika (Dipt. Phoridae). Stuttgart. Beitr. Naturk. 21: 1–11.Google Scholar
Beyer, E.M. 1965. Phoridae. Explor. Parc Nat. Albert Miss. de Witte 1933–1935. 99: 1–211.Google Scholar
Binns, E.S. 1980. Mating behavior, fecundity and feeding in the mushroom phorid, Megaselia halterata (Wood) (Diptera). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 116: 45–57.Google Scholar
Bohart, G.E., and Gressitt, J.L.. 1951. Filth-inhabiting flies of Guam. Bull. Bishop Mus., Honolulu. 204: 1–152.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1923 a. Contribuiçâo para o conhecimento dos Phorideos do Brasil. Arch. Mus. nac., Río de J. 23: 323–346.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1923 b. Notas sôbre Phorideos brasileiros. Vozes de Petrópolis. 17: 580–582, 628–630, 741–742, 794–796, 848–850, 957–958.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1923 c. Novos Phorideos brasileiros. Bol. Mus. nac., Río de J. 1: 51–59.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1924 a. Novos generos e especies de phorideos de Brasil. Bol. Mus. nac., Río de J. 1: 167–202.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1924 b. Um novo genero de Phorideos de Paraná, com uma nota prèvia sobre um novo genero ecitophilo da Argentina. Bol. Mus. nac., Río de J. 1: 283–288.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1925. Novos subsidios para o conhecimento da familia Phoridae. Arch. Mus. nac., Río de J. 25: 85–281.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1928. Nota previa sobre alguns phorideos que parasitam formigas cortadeiras dos generos Atta e Acromyrmex. Bol. biol. (1928): 119–126.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1931 a. Especies arachnophilas e outras especies dos generos Megaselia Rondani (1856) e Pericyclocera Schmitz (1928) (Dipt.: Phoridae). Revta. Ent., Río de J. 1: 142–150.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1931 b. Sobre alguns Phorideos que parasitam a saúva e outras formigas cortadeiras. Arch. Inst. biol. 4: 209–228.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1934. Sobre alguns Fondeos da Guiana Ingleza, colecionados pela expediçâo da Universidade de Oxford (1929) e conservados no Museu Britanico (Dipt.: Phoridae). Arq. Inst. Biol. Veget. 1: 27–34.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1937. Um nova especie de Apocephalus (Dipt. Phoridae), endoparasita de Chauliognathus fallax Germ. (Col. Cantharidae). Revta. Ent., Río de J. 7: 207–216.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1958. Neue Beitraege zur Kenntnis der neotropischen Phoriden (Diptera, Phoridae). Studia ent. 1: 305–406.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1959. Neue und wenig bekannte Phoriden aus der neotropischen Region, nebst einigen Arten aus dem Belgischen Congo-Gebiet (Diptera, Phoridae). Studia ent. 2: 129–208.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1961. Weitere Beitraege zur Kenntnis der neotropischen Phoriden, nebst Beschreibung einiger Dohrniphora-Arten aus der indo-australischen Region (Diptera, Phoridae). Studia ent. 4: 1–112.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1962 a. Some new North American species of the dipterous family Phoridae. Rev. bras. Biol. 22: 65–82.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1962 b. Versuch einer Uebersicht ueber die neotropischen Megaselia- Arten, sowie neue oder wenig bekannte Phoriden verschiedener Gattungen (Diptera, Phoridae). Studia ent. 5: 289–488.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1963. Revision of the North American phorid flies. Part I. The Phorinae, Aenigmatiinae and Metopininae, except Megaselia. Studia ent. 6: 1–256.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1964. Revision of the North American phorid flies. Part II. The species of the genus Megaselia, subgenus Aphiochaeta. Studia ent. 7: 257–416.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1966. Revision of the North American phorid flies. Part III. The species of the genus Megaselia, subgenus Megaselia. Studia ent. 8(1965): 1–160.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1967 a. A new genus and species of phorid fly from Canada (Diptera: Phoridae). Can. Ent. 99: 221–223.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1967 b. New or little-known phorid flies, with the description of two new genera (Diptera, Phoridae). Anais Acad. bras. Ciênc. 39: 195–210.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1967 c. Studies on the Indo-Australian phorid flies, based mainly on material of the Museum of Comparative Zoology and the United States National Museum (Diptera, Phoridae). Studia ent. 9(1966): 129–328.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1968. A catalogue of the Phoridae of the World (Diptera, Phoridae). Studia ent. 11: 1–367.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1969 a. Bredin-Archbold-Smithsonian biological survey of Dominica: the Phoridae of Dominica (Diptera). Smithson. Contr. Zool. 23: 1–69.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1969 b. New or little-known phorid flies, mainly of the Neotropical Region. Studia ent. 12: 33–132.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T. 1971. Supplement to a catalogue of the Phoridae of the World. Studia ent. 14: 177–224.Google Scholar
Borgmeier, T., and Prado, A.P. do. 1975. New or little known phorid flies with descriptions of eight new genera (Dipt. Phoridae). Studia ent. 18: 3–90.Google Scholar
Brauer, F. 1883. Die Zweiflügler des kaiserlichen Museums zu Wien. III. Systematische Studien auf Grundlage der Dipteren-Larven nebst einer Zusammenstellung von Beispielen aus der Literatur über dieselben und Beschreibung neuer Formen. Denksch. Akad. Wiss., Wien. 42: 108–118.Google Scholar
Briggs, J.C. 1987. Biogeography and Plate Tectonics. Developments in Paleontology and Stratigraphy, 10. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, xi + 204 pp.Google Scholar
Bristowe, W.S. 1925. Observations on Brazilian insects and spiders. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 72(1924): 475–503.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V. 1985. Revision of Gymnophora Macquart (Diptera: Phoridae) of the Holarctic Region. M.Sc. thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont. iv + 122 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V. 1986. Striking sexual dimorphism and its Taxonomic consequences among New World phorid flies (Diptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 88: 787–788.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V. 1987 a. Classification, reconstructed phylogeny and geographic history of the Neotropical phorid flies of the genus Gymnophora (Diptera: Phoridae). J. nat. Hist. 21: 1477–1524.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V. 1987 b. Revision of the Gymnophora (Diptera: Phoridae) of the Holarctic Region: Classification, reconstructed phylogeny and geographic history. Syst. Entomol. 12: 271–304.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V. 1988. Additions to the phorid chapter in the “Manual of Nearctic Diptera, volume 2” (Diptera: Phoridae) Can. Ent. 120: 307–322.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V. 1989. Testing phylogenetic hypotheses: New species of Gymnophora Macquart (Diptera: Phoridae) from Japan and Nepal, with an updated world classification. Can. J. Zool. 67: 2543–2556.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V. 1990 a. Generic revision of Phoridae of the Nearctic Region and phylogenetic classification of Phoridae, Sciadoceridae and Ironomyiidae (Diptera: Phoridea). Ph.D. thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. 470 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V. 1990 b. Triphleba vitrinervis (Malloch), an unrecognized species of Crinophleba Borgmeier (Diptera: Phoridae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 92: 294–296.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V. 1990 c. Update of World Catalogue of the Phoridae (Borgmeier 1968), plus supplement (Borgmeier 1971) Fly Times. 4: 12–18.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V. 1990 d. Using Peldri II as an alternative to critical point drying for small flies. Fly Times. 4: 6.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V. 1992. Life history, immature stages and undescribed male of Rhynchomicropteron (Diptera: Phoridae). J. nat. Hist. 26: 407–416.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V. 1993. Convergent adaptations in some Phoridae (Diptera) living in the nests of social insects: A review of the New World Aenigmatiinae. In Danks, H.V., and Ball, G.E. (Eds.), Systematics and Entomology: Diversity, Distribution, Adaptation, and Application. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. In press.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V., and Feener, D.H. Jr., 1991 a. Behavior and host location cues of Apocephalus paraponerae (Diptera: Phoridae), a parasitoid of the giant tropical ant Paraponera clavata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Biotropica 23: 182–187.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V., and Feener, D.H. Jr., 1991 b. Life history parameters and immature stages of Apocephalus paraponerae (Diptera: Phoridae), a parasitoid of the giant tropical ant Paraponera clavata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. nat. Hist. 25: 221–321.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V., Francoeur, A., and Gibson, R.L.. 1991. Review of the genus Styletta (Diptera: Phoridae), with description of a new genus. Ent. scand. 22: 241–250.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V., and Marshall, S.A.. 1984. Phorid flies (Diptera: Phoridae) associated with mushrooms in southern Ontario. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 115: 77–80.Google Scholar
Brown, B. V., and Pike, E.M.. 1990. Three new fossil phorid flies (Diptera: Phoridae) from Canadian Cretaceous amber. Can. J. Earth Sci. 27: 845–848.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1902. Notes on the larvae of some Texan Diptera. Psyche. 9: 351–354.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1904. A monograph of the North American Phoridae. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 29(1903): 331–403.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1905. Phoridae from the Indo-Australian region. Ann. Mus. nat. Hung. 3: 541–555.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1906. Diptera, Family Phoridae. In Wystman, P. (Ed.), Genera Insectorum. Volume 44. Bruxelles, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1908. Two fossil Phoridae from the Miocene shales of Florissant, Colorado. Bull. Am. Mus. nat Hist 24: 273–275.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1911. New Diptera of the family Phoridae from Paraguay. Ann. Mus. nat. Hung. 9: 436–442.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1913. A new species of Phoridae reared from dried Coleoptera. Ann. Mus. nat. Hung. 11: 336–338.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1915. A synonymic catalogue of the dipterous family Phoridae. Bull. Wis. nat. Hist. Soc. 12: 85–152.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1923. Two new species of Phoridae from Baltic amber. Psyche. 30: 59–62.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1924. Notes on some New England Phoridae (Diptera). Psyche. 31: 41–44.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1930. Aenictomyia, a new myrmecophilous phorid from the Philippines. Psyche. 37: 163–166.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1939. Fossil Phoridae in Baltic amber. Bull. Mus. nac. Zool. Harv. 85: 413–436.Google Scholar
Burges, R.J. 1979. A rare fly and its parasitic behavior toward an ant (Diptera: Phoridae, Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Fla. Ent. 62: 413–414.Google Scholar
Chvála, M. 1983. The Empidoidea (Diptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. II. General Part, the families Hybotidae, Atelestidae and Microphoridae. Fauna ent. scand. 12: 279 pp.Google Scholar
Colyer, C.N. 1950. Notes on the breeding of Diploneura pilosella Schmitz and Megaselia rufipes Mg. (Dipt., Phoridae) and on the puparium of the former. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 86: 320–322.Google Scholar
Colyer, C.N. 1952 a. Notes on the life-histories of the British species of Phalacrotophora Enderlein (Dipt., Phoridae). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 88: 135–139.Google Scholar
Colyer, C.N. 1952 b. Notes on Triphleba minuta F. (Dipt., Phoridae) and its immature stages. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 88: 226–229.Google Scholar
Colyer, C.N. 1954 a. The “Coffin” fly, Conicera tibialis Schmitz (Dipt., Phoridae). J. Soc. Br. Ent. 4: 203–206.Google Scholar
Colyer, C.N. 1954 b. Further emergences of Conicera tibialis Schmitz, the “coffin fly” (Diptera, Phoridae). Entomologist. 87: 234.Google Scholar
Colyer, C.N. 1954 c. Further notes on the life-histories of the British species of Phalacrotophora Enderlein (Dipt., Phoridae). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 90: 208–210.Google Scholar
Colyer, C.N. 1954 d More about the “coffin” fly, Conicera tibialis Schmitz, (Diptera, Phoridae). Entomologist. 87: 129–132.Google Scholar
Colyer, C.N. 1954 e. A new species of Megaselia (Dipt., Phoridae) from Britain: Notes on British fungicolous Phoridae. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 89: 108–112.Google Scholar
Colyer, C.N. 1954 f. “Swarming” of Phoridae (Diptera). J. Soc. Br. Ent. 5: 22–37.Google Scholar
Colyer, C.N. 1957. A new species of Conicera (Diptera: Phoridae) from Hawaii, with observations on the genera Parafannia Bohart and Gymnoptera Lioy. Proc. Hawaii, ent. Soc. 16: 232–240.Google Scholar
Colyer, C.N. 1958. A new species of Aenigmatopoeus, and the hitherto unknown male in the genus (Diptera, Phoridae). Studia ent. 1: 247–258.Google Scholar
Compton, S.G., and Disney, R.H.L.. 1991. New species of Megaselia (Diptera: Phoridae) whose larvae live in fig syconia (Urticales: Moraceae), and adults prey on fig wasps (Hymenoptera: Agaonidae). J. nat. Hist. 25: 203–219.Google Scholar
Cooper, K.W. 1990. Likely causes and explanation of probable atavism in a somatically mosaic fly from a wild population (Diptera, Asilidae, Nannocyrtopogon minutus). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 92: 373–384.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1901 a. Apocephalus Coquille«, nov. gen. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 4: 501.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1901 b. A systematic arrangement of the families of the Diptera. Proc. U. S. natn. Mus. 23: 653–658.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1907. A new phorid genus with horny ovipositor. Can. Ent. 39: 207–208.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1910. The type species of the North American genera of Diptera. Proc. U. S. natn. Mus. 37: 449–647.Google Scholar
Craw, R. 1982. Phylogenetics, areas, geology and the biogeography of Croizat: A radical view. Syst. Zool. 31: 304–316.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. 1833. British Entomology: Being Illustrations and Descriptions of the Genera of Insects found in Great Britain and Ireland. Volume 10. E. Ellis & Co., London, pp 434–481.Google Scholar
Dahl, F. 1898. Ueber den Floh und seine Stellung im System. S. B. Ges. Nat. Fr. Berlin. (1898): 185–199.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1972. Flies reared from pupae found in shells of garden snails. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 108: 87.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1976 a. A further case of a nematoceran fly (Diptera: Sciaridae) parasitized by a species of scuttle fly (Diptera: Phoridae). Entomologist's Gaz. 27: 91–98.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1976 b. A further case of a scuttle fly (Dipt., Phoridae) whose larvae attack slug eggs. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 112: 174.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1978. A new species of afrotropical Megaselia (Diptera: Phoridae), with a re-evaluation of the genus Plastophora. Z. angew. Zool. 65: 313–319.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1979 a. Multinevra macropygidia n.gen., n.sp., a curious afrotropical scuttle fly (Diptera: Phoridae). Ent. scand. 10: 79–80.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1979 b. Natural history notes on some British Phoridae (Diptera) with comments on a changing picture. Entomologist's Gaz. 30: 141–150.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1980 a. Records of flower visiting by scuttle flies (Diptera: Phoridae) in the British Isles. Naturalist. 105: 45–50.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1980 b. Some soil-inhabiting scuttle flies (Dipt., Phoridae). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 115(1979): 231–232.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1981 a. A new, and first Afrotropical, species of Auxanommatidia (Diptera: Phoridae). Z. angew. Zool. 67(1980): 323–330.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1981 b. A new species of Megaselia from Nepenthes in Hong Kong, with re-evaluation of genus Endonepenthia (Diptera: Phoridae). Orient. Insects. 15: 201–206.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1981 c. A new species of Perissa Borgmeier (Dipt., Phoridae) from Sénégal. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 116(1980): 101–104.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1981 d. A re-examination of the scuttle-fly genus Rhynchomicropteron (Phoridae), with two new species from Sarawak. Syst. Entomol. 6: 55–59.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1982. Re-evaluation of the genus Citrago Schmitz (Dipt., Phoridae) and a consequent secondary homonym. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 118: 247–248.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1983 a. Scuttle flies — Diptera, Phoridae (except Megaselia). Handbk Idem. Br. Insects. 10: 1–81.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1983 b. A useful new character in the giant genus Megaselia (Diptera: Phoridae) with two new species from Britain. Z. angew. Zool. 70: 225–234.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1985 a. Re-interpretation of the wing veins in the Phoridae (Diptera). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 121: 55–58.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1985 b. Watching scuttle flies on Project Wallace. Antenna. 9: 139–141.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1986 a. Morphological and other obervations on Chonocephalus (Phoridae) and phylogenetic implications for the Cyclorrhapha (Diptera). J. Zool., hond. (A). 210: 77–87.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1986 b. A new genus and three new species of Phoridae (Diptera) parasitizing ants (Hymenoptera) in Sulawesi. J. nat. Hist. 20: 777–787.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1986 c. A new genus of scuttle-fly (Diptera: Phoridae) from England. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 87: 85–89.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1986 d. Two remarkable new species of scuttle-fly (Diptera: Phoridae) that parasitize termites (Isoptera) in Sulawesi. Syst. Entomol. 11: 413–422.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1987 a. Four species of scuttle fly (Diptera: Phoridae) from Dominican amber. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 63: 377–380.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1987 b. A most remarkable new genus of scuttle fly (Diptera:Phoridae) from Sulawesi. Syst. Entomol. 12: 29–32.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1987 c. A new genus and two new species of Phoridae (Dipt.) from nests of ants (Hym., Formicidae) in Sulawesi. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 123: 157–161.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1987 d. Observations on a peculiar mechanism in the crop of some Phoridae (Diptera) and its Taxonomic value. J. nat. Hist. 21: 275–280.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1988 a. Biology and taxonomy of Old World Puliciphora (Diptera: Phoridae) with descriptions of nine new species. Orient. Insects. 22: 267–286.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1988 b. An interesting new species of Megaselia from Sulawesi, the ground plan of the Phoridae (Diptera) and phylogenetic implications for the Cyclorrhapha. Syst. Entomol. 13: 433–441.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1988 c. A new species of Microselia (Dipt. Phoridae) from France. Ann. Parasit, hum. nac. 63: 85–88.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1988 d. Unusual costal chaetotaxy in the phylogenetically interesting Ironomyiidae and Sciadoceridae (Diptera). Ann. ent. Fennici. 54: 19–20.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1989 a. Antidote to taxonomic instability. Nature. 342: 488.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1989 b. A key to Australasian and Oriental Woodiphora (Diptera: Phoridae), affinities of the genus and description of new species. J. nat. Hist. 23: 1137–1175.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1989 c. Scuttle flies — Diptera, Phoridae, Genus Megaselia. Handbk Ident. Br. Insects. 10: 1–155.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1990 a. A key to Diplonevra males of the Australasian and Oriental Regions, including two new species (Diptera, Phoridae). Ent. Fennica. 1: 33–39.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1990 b. Revision of the Alamirinae (Diptera: Phoridae). Syst. Entomol. 15: 305–320.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1990 c. Some myths and the reality of scuttle fly biology. Antenna. 14: 64–67.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1990 d. A striking new species of Megaselia (Diptera, Phoridae) from Sulawesi, with re-evaluation of related genera. Ent. Fennica. 1: 25–31.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1991 a. The fire-ant parasitoids of the Pseudacteon spatulatus complex (Diptera, Phoridae; Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Sociobiol. 18: 283–298.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1991 b. Scuttle flies (Diptera: Phoridae) as parasites of earthworms (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae). Br. J. Ent. Nat. Hist. 4: 11–13.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L. 1991 c. Support for the revised interpretation of the wing veins of Phoridae (Diptera). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 127: 73–76.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L., and Chazeau, J.. 1990. The recognition and biology of Phalacrotophora quadrimaculata (Diptera: Phoridae) parasitising Olla v-nigrum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) used in attempts to control the Leucaena psyllid. Ann. Parasit, hum. comp. 65: 98–100.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L., and Evans, R.E.. 1988. New host records for fungus-breeding Phoridae (Diptera). Entomologist's Ree. J. Var. 100: 208–210.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L., and Gunn, L.C.. 1980. Some scuttle flies (Dipt., Phoridae) from emergence traps over raspberry stools in Scotland. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 115(1979): 23–25.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L., Henderson, I.F., Perry, J.N., and Clements, R.O.. 1981. Phoridae (Diptera) from English pasture soils. Pedobiol. 22: 366–378.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L., and Kistner, D.H.. 1989 a. Neotropical Phoridae from army ant colonies, including two new species (Diptera; Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Sociobiol. 16: 149–174.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L., and Kistner, D.H.. 1989 b. Phoridae from termite colonies in Africa, including two new species (Diptera; Isoptera, Termitidae). Sociobiol. 16: 75–90.Google Scholar
Disney, R.H.L., and Kistner, D.H.. 1990. Revision of the termite-parasitizing genus Dicranopteron (Diptera: Phoridae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 98: 111–112.Google Scholar
Donisthorpe, H.St.J.K. 1927. The Guests of British Ants; Their Habits and Life Histories. George Routledge and Sons, London. 244 pp.Google Scholar
Durrenfeldt, A. 1968. Dipteren aus dem Oberpliozän von Willershausen. Beih. Ber. naturh. Ges., Hannover. 6: 43–81.Google Scholar
Eberhard, W.G. 1985. Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, x + 244 pp.Google Scholar
Edwards, F.W., and Schmitz, H.. 1939. New data concerning Thaumatoxena Breddin & Borner. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B). 8: 79–87.Google Scholar
Enderlein, G. 1908. Oniscomyia domi, eine neue deutsche als Ameisengast lebende flügelose Fliegengattung, sowie über die systematische Stellung der Thaumatoxena. Zool. Jb. Abt. Syst. Oekol. Geogr. 27: 145–156.Google Scholar
Enderlein, G. 1912. Die Phoridenfauna Süd-Brasiliens. Stett. ent. Ztg. 73: 16–45.Google Scholar
Enderlein, G. 1924. Zur Klassifikation der Phoriden und über vernichtende Kritik. Ent. Mitt. 8: 270–281.Google Scholar
Enderlein, G. 1936. 22. Ordnung: Zweiflügler, Diptera. In Brohmer, P., Ehrmann, P., and Ulmer, G. (Eds.), Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas. Quelle & Meyer, Leipzig. 259 pp.Google Scholar
Ennik, F. 1973. Apocephalus borealis Brues parasitic upon Vespula spp. (Diptera: Phoridae; Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 49: 403–404.Google Scholar
Evenhuis, N.L. 1991. Additions to catalog chapters. Pac. Basin Dipt. News. 5: 1–8.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1794. Entomologia Systematica Emendata et Aucta. Volume 4. Hafniae (=Copenhagen). 472 pp.Google Scholar
Fallén, C.T. 1823. Phytomyzides et Ochtidae Sveciae. Lund. 10 pp.Google Scholar
Farris, J.S. 1989. Hennig86: A PC-DOS program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics. 5: 163.Google Scholar
Feener, D.H. Jr., 1981. Competition between ant species: Outcome controlled by parasitic flies. Science. 214: 815–817.Google Scholar
Feener, D.H. Jr., 1987. Size-selective oviposition in Pseudacteon crawfordi (Diptera: Phoridae), a parasite of fire ants. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 80: 148–151.Google Scholar
Feener, D.H. Jr., 1988. Effects of parasites on foraging and defense behavior of a termitophagous ant, Pheidole titanis Wheeler (Hymenoptera:Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22: 421–427Google Scholar
Feener, D.H. Jr., and Brown, B.V.. 1992. Reduced foraging of the tropical fire ant, Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in the presence of parasitic phorid flies, Pseudacteon spp. (Diptera: Phoridae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 85: 80–84.Google Scholar
Feener, D.H. Jr., and Moss, K.A.G.. 1990. Defense against parasites by hitchhikers in leaf-cutting ants: A quantitative assessment. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 17–29.Google Scholar
Ferrar, P. 1987. A Guide to the Breeding Habits and Immature Stages of Diptera Cyclorrhapha. Volume 1 & 2. Entomograph, 8. Brill/ Scandanavian Science Press, Leiden. 907 pp.Google Scholar
Fleming, R.L. 1977. The General Ecology, Flora and Fauna of Midland Nepal. University Press, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu. vi + 105 pp.Google Scholar
Forbush, E.H., and Femald, C.H.. 1896. The Gypsy Moth, Prothetria dispar (L.). A report of the work of destroying the insect in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, together with an account of its history and habits both in Massachusetts and Europe. Massachusetts State Board of Agriculture, Boston, MA. 495 pp.Google Scholar
Fuller, M.E. 1934. The early stages of Sciadocera rufomaculata White (Dipt. Phoridae). Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. W. 59: 9–15.Google Scholar
Fuller, M.E., and Lee, D.J.. 1938. A new termitophilous phorid (Diptera). Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. W. 63: 75–80.Google Scholar
Gemesi, O., and Disney, R.H.L.. 1991. A further case of parasitisation of larval Bibionidae by a scuttle fly (Diptera: Phoridae). Entomologist's Gaz. 42: 67–69.Google Scholar
Glasgow, J.P. 1960. Variation in the venation of Glossina Wiedemann (Diptera: Muscidae). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A). 35: 49–57.Google Scholar
Gotô, T. 1983 a. Discovery of the genus Aenigmatias Meinert from Japan, with a redescription of A. domi (Enderlein) (Diptera, Phoridae). Esakia. 20: 139–148.Google Scholar
Gotô, T. 1983 b. A new phorid fly of the genus Crinophleba from Japan (Diptera, Phoridae). Kontyû. 51: 376–383.Google Scholar
Gotô, T. 1984 a. Systematic study of the genus Phora Latreille from Japan (Diptera, Phoridae) I. Description of a new species, with discussion on the terminology of the male genitalia. Kontyû. 52: 159–171.Google Scholar
Gotô, T. 1984 b. Two new species of the genus Trophithauma Schmitz from Japan (Diptera, Phoridae). Bull. Kitakyushu Mus. nat. Hist. 5: 75–84.Google Scholar
Gotô, T. 1985 a. Megaselia (Aphiochaeta) araneivora sp. nov., an egg predator of the orb-web spider Argiope aemura (Walckenaer) in Japan (Diptera, Phoridae). Esakia. 23: 77–84.Google Scholar
Gotô, T. 1985 b. A review of the Oriental genus Rhopica, with description of a new species from Papua New Guinea (Diptera, Phoridae). Esakia. 23: 85–92.Google Scholar
Gotô, T. 1985 c. Systematic study of the genus Phora Latreille from Japan (Diptera, Phoridae) II. Description of four new species. Kontyû. 53: 1–11.Google Scholar
Gotô, T. 1985 d. Systematic study of the genus Phora Latreille from Japan (Diptera, Phoridae) III. Kontyû. 53: 547–560.Google Scholar
Gotô, T. 1985 e. Systematic study of the genus Phora Latreille from Japan (Diptera, Phoridae) IV. Kontyû. 53: 658–670.Google Scholar
Gotô, T. 1986. Systematic study of the genus Phora Latreille from Japan (Diptera, Phoridae) V. Kontyû. 54: 128–142.Google Scholar
Gotô, T., and Takeno, K.. 1983. A new Triphleba species with bifurcate antennae from Japan (Diptera, Phoridae). Esakia. 20: 149–156.Google Scholar
Grensted, L.W. 1956. Species of Spiniphora (Dipt., Phoridae) in Gloucestershire. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 92: 405.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G.C.D. 1972. The phylogenetic classification of Diptera Cyclorrhapha. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague. 341 pp.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. 1989. The genus Metopina (Diptera: Phoridae) from Cretaceous and Tertiary ambers. Jl. N. Y. ent. Soc. 97: 65–72.Google Scholar
Grodowitz, M.J., Krchma, J., and Broce, A.B.. 1982. A method for preparing soft bodied larval Diptera for scanning electron microscopy. J. Kans. ent. Soc. 55: 751–753.Google Scholar
Hackman, W. 1963 a. On the dipterous fauna of rodent burrows in Northern Lapland. Notal. ent. 43: 121–131.Google Scholar
Hackman, W. 1963 b. Studies on the dipterous fauna in burrows of voles (Microtus, Clethrionomys) in Finland. Acta zool. Fennica. 102: 1–64.Google Scholar
Hackman, W. 1967. On Diptera in small mammal burrows in Northern Europe and Southern Spain. Notai. ent. 42: 1–14.Google Scholar
Hackman, W., and Väisänen, R.. 1985. The evolution and phylogenetic significance of the costal chaetotaxy in the Diptera. Ann. zool. Fennici. 22: 169–203.Google Scholar
Hawley, M.K., and Georghiou, G.P.. 1970. Isolation and description of twelve morphological mutants of Fannia canicularis (Diptera: Muscidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 980–985.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1948. Die Larvenformen der Dipteren. Volume 1. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin. 185 pp.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1952. Die Larvenformen der Dipteren. Volume 3. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin. 628 pp.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1964. Die Dipteren-Family Sciadoceridae in Baltischen Bernstein (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha Aschiza). Stuttgart. Beitr. Naturk., A. 127: 1–10.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL. xiii + 263 pp.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1973. Diptera (Zweiflügler). In Helmcke, J.-G., Starek, D., and Wermuth, H. (Eds.), Handbuch der Zoologie. Volume IV (2), 2/31. Walter De Gruyter, Berlin. 337 pp.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1976. Das Hypopygium von Lonchoptera lutea Panzer und die phylogenetischen Verwandtschaftsbe ziehungen der Cyclorrhapha (Diptera). Stuttgart. Beitr. Naturk., A. 283: 1–63.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1981. Insect Phylogeny. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. xxii + 514 pp.Google Scholar
Hong, Y.C. 1981. Eocene Fossil Diptera Insecta in Amber of Fushun Coalfield. V. Systematical Description. 4. Phoronomorpha. Geological Publishing House, Peking. 166 pp.Google Scholar
Janzen, D.H., and Carroll, C.R.. 1983. Paraponera clavata (bala, giant tropical ant), pp. 752–753in Janzen, D.H. (Ed.), Costa Rican Natural History. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Kaneko, K., and Furukawa, E.. 1977. Studies on phorid flies (Phoridae, Diptera) in Japan. Part II. Morphological notes on larvae and pupae. J. Aichi med. Univ. Ass. 5: 65–72.Google Scholar
Keilen, D. 1911. Recherches sur la morphologie larvaire des Diptères du genre Phora. Bull. scient. Fr. Belg. 45: 27–88.Google Scholar
Kessel, E.L., and Maggioncalda, E. A.. 1968. A revision of the genera of Platypezidae, with the descriptions of five new genera, and considerations of phylogeny, circumversion and hypopygia (Diptera). Wasmann J. Biol. 26: 33–106.Google Scholar
Kistner, D.H. 1982. The social insect's bestiary, pp. 1–244in Hermann, H.R. (Ed.), Social Insects. Volume III. Academic Press, New York & London.Google Scholar
Kloter, K.O., Penner, L.R., and Widmer, W.J.. 1977. Interactions between the larvae of Psychoda alternata and Dohrniphora cornuta in a trickling filter sewage bed, with descriptions of the immature stages of the latter. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 70: 775–781.Google Scholar
Knab, F. 1913. Some earlier observations on the habits of Aphiochaeta juli Brues. Insecutor Inscit. menstr. 1: 24.Google Scholar
LaBerge, W.E. 1953. A note on a phorid parasite of Pheidole dentata Mayr. J. Kans. ent. Soc. 26: 69.Google Scholar
Larsson, S.G. 1978. Baltic Amber: A Palaeobiological Study. Entomonograph, 1. Scandanavian Science Press, Klampenborg. 192 pp.Google Scholar
Latreille, P.A. 1796. Précis des caractères génériques des Insectes, disposés dans un ordre naturel. Paris, xiii + 179 pp.Google Scholar
Latreille, P.A. 1802. Histoire naturelle, générale it particulière, des Crustacés et des Insectes. In Sonnini, C. S. (Ed.), Histoire Naturelle par Buffon. Volume 3. Paris. 468 pp.Google Scholar
Leruth, R. 1936. Phorides cavernicoles de Belgique (Ins.Dipt.) (2e note) (1). Bull. Mus. r. Hist. nat. Belg. 12: 1–23.Google Scholar
Lincoln, R.J., Boxshall, G.A., and Clark, P.F.. 1982. A Dictionary of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. Cambridge University Press, London, viii + 298 pp.Google Scholar
Lioy, P. 1864. I ditteri distributi secondo un nuovo metodo di classificazione naturale (conci.). Atti Ist. veneto Sci. 10: 59–84.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J.E. 1973. Firefly parasites and predators. Coleopt. Bull. 27: 91–106.Google Scholar
Lundbeck, W. 1920. Remarks on Paraspiniphora maculata Meig., nota Zett., bergenstammi Mik, and domestica Wood, together with changes of names of three newly described species of Aphiochaeta. Kobenhaven nath. Medad 71: 125–132.Google Scholar
Lundbeck, W. 1922. Pipunculidae, Phoridae. Diptera Dánica, Part IV. G. E. C. Gad, Copenhagen. 455 pp.Google Scholar
MacDonald, J.F., Akre, R.D., and Hill, W.B.. 1975. Nest associates of Vespula atropilosa and V. pennsylvanica in southeastern Washington state (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 48: 53–63.Google Scholar
MacDonald, J.F., and Matthews, R.W.. 1983. Colony associates of the southern yellowjacket, Vespula squamosa (Drury). J. Georgia ent. Soc. 18: 555–559.Google Scholar
Macquart, M. 1835. Histoire naturelle des Insectes. Diptères, Tome deuxième. In Roret, N.E. (Ed.), Collection des Suites à Buffon. Paris. 703 pp.Google Scholar
Maddison, W.P., Donoghue, M.J., and Maddison, D.R.. 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Syst. Zool. 33: 83–103.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1908. Notes on Phoridae in Dumbartonshire, with description of a new species. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 19: 203–205.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1909. A division of the dipterous genus Phora Latr. into subgenera. Glasg. Nat. 1: 24–28.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1910. Scottish Phoridae, with tables of all the British species and notes of localities. Ann. Scot. nat. Hist. 1910: 15–21, 87–92.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1912. The insects of the dipterous family Phoridae in the United States National Museum. Proc. U. S. natn. Mus. 43: 411–529.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1914. Costa Rican Diptera collected by Philip P. Calvert, PH.D., 1909–1910. Paper 1. A partial report on the Borboridae, Phoridae and Agromyzidae. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 40: 1–36.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1923. A new genus of Phoridae. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 18: 143–144.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F. 1967. A detailed study of Ironomyiidae (Diptera: Phoroidea). Can. Ent. 99: 225–236.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F. 1973. A fossil ironomyiid fly from Canadian amber (Diptera: Ironomyiidae). Can. Ent. 105: 105–111.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F. 1981. Morphology and terminology — adults, pp. 9–63in McAlpine, J.F., Peterson, B.V., Shewell, G.E., Teskey, H.J., Vockeroth, J.R., and Wood, D.M. (Eds.), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Volume 1. Agriculture Canada Monograph 27. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F. 1989. Phylogeny and classification of the Muscomorpha. pp. 1397–1518in McAlpine, J.F., and Wood, D.M. (Eds.), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Volume 3. Agriculture Canada Monograph 32. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F., and Martin, J.E.H.. 1966. Systematics of Sciadoceridae and relatives with descriptions of two new genera and species from Canadian amber and erection of family Ironomyiidae (Diptera: Phoroidea). Can. Ent. 98: 527–544.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F., and Munroe, D.D.. 1968. Swarming of lonchaeid flies and other insects, with descriptions of four new species of Lonchaeidae (Diptera). Can. Ent. 100: 1154–1178.Google Scholar
Meigen, J.W. 1804. Beschreibung der europäischen zweiflügeligen Insekten (Diptera Linn.). Volume I. Braunschweig (=Brunswick), xxviii + 314 pp.Google Scholar
Meigen, J.W. 1830. Systematische Beischreibung der bekannten europaeiischen zweifluegeligen Insecten. Volume 6. Hamm, iv + 401 pp.Google Scholar
Meinert, F. 1890. Aenigmatias blattoides, dipteron novum apterum. Ent. Meddr. 2: 212–226.Google Scholar
Melander, A.L. 1949. A report on some Miocene Diptera from Florissant. Am. Mus. Nov. 1407: 1–63.Google Scholar
Meiander, A.L., and Brues, C.T.. 1903. Guests and parasites of the burrowing bee Halictus. Biol. Bull. 5: 1–27.Google Scholar
Menozzi, C. 1921. Una nuova specie del genere Apocephalus Coquillett, parassita del Crematogaster scutellaris Oliv. Boll. Soc. ent. ital. 51: 70–77.Google Scholar
Miller, P.L. 1978. Intraspecific phorid phoresy. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 114: 211–214.Google Scholar
Miller, P.L. 1984. Alternative reproductive routines in a small fly, Puliciphora borinquenensis (Diptera: Phoridae). Ecol. Ent. 9: 293–302.Google Scholar
Morris, H.M. 1922. On the larva and pupa of a parasitic phorid fly — Hypocera incrassata Mg. Parasitology. 14: 70–74.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J.E. 1988. Correlation between wing size and position of a hind crossvein in the Siphonini (Diptera: Tachinidae). J. nat. Hist. 22: 1141–1146.Google Scholar
Oldroyd, H. 1964. The natural history of flies. W.W., Norton & Co., Inc., New York, NY. xiv + 342 pp.Google Scholar
Packard, A.S. Jr., 1868. The parasites of the honey-bee. Am. Nat. 2: 195–205.Google Scholar
Payne, J. A., King, J. A., and Beinhart, G.. 1968. Arthropod succession and decomposition of buried pigs. Nature. 219: 1180–1181.Google Scholar
Pergande, T. 1901. The ant decapitating fly. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 4: 497–502.Google Scholar
Peterson, B.V. 1987 a. Lonchopteridae. pp. 675–680in McAlpine, J.F., Peterson, B.V., Shewell, G.E., Teskey, H.J., Vockeroth, J.R., and Wood, D.M. (Eds.), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Volume 2. Agriculture Canada Monograph 28. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Peterson, B.V. 1987 b. Phoridae. pp. 689–712in McAlpine, J.F., Peterson, B.V., Shewell, G.E., Teskey, H.J., Vockeroth, J.R., and Wood, D.M. (Eds.), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Volume 2. Agriculture Canada Monograph 28. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Peterson, B.V., and Robinson, W.H.. 1976. A new North American genus and species of the family Phoridae (Diptera). Can. Ent. 108: 119–121.Google Scholar
Picard, F. 1930. Sur le parasitisme d'un phoride (Megaselia cuspidata Schmitz) aux dépens d'un myriapode. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr. 55: 180–183.Google Scholar
Platnick, N.I. 1989. An empirical comparison of microcomputer parsimony programs, II. Cladistics. 5: 145–161.Google Scholar
Prado, A.P. do. 1976. Records and descriptions of phorid flies, mainly of the Neotropical Region (Diptera; Phoridae). Studia ent. 19: 561–609.Google Scholar
Rettenmeyer, C.W., and Akre, R.D.. 1968. Ectosymbiosis between phorid flies and army ants. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 1317–1326.Google Scholar
Robinson, W.H. 1967. A phytophagous phorid. Proc. North Cent. Branch ent. Soc. Am. 22: 158.Google Scholar
Robinson, W.H. 1971. Old and new biologies of Megaselia species (Diptera: Phoridae). Studia ent. 14: 321–348.Google Scholar
Rohdendorf, B. 1974. The Historical Development of Diptera. University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, Alta. xv + 344 pp. [English language translation.]Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1856. Dipterologiae Italicae prodromus. Volume 1. Parmae. 228 pp.Google Scholar
Roser, C. von. 1840. Erster Nachtrag zu dem in Jahre 1834 bekannt gemachten Verzeichnisse in Württemberg vorkommender zweiflügliger Insekten. K. Württemb. Landw. Ver., Stuttgart, Correspondenzbl. 37: 49–64.Google Scholar
Saether, O.A. 1979. Underlying synapomorphies and anagenetic analysis. Zoologica Scripta. 8: 305–312.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1914. Eine neue europäische Metopina mit characteristischen Merkmalen exotischer Phoridenarten. Z. wiss. InsektBiol. 10: 91–94.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1915. Neue Beiträge zur Kenntnis der myrmecophilen und termitophilen Phoriden. Nummer 2–15. Dt. ent. Z. (1915): 465–507.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1916. Wie erklärt sich die Dreizahl der Malpighischen Gefässe bei Termitoxenia Wasm.? Amt. Anz. 49: 329–335.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1917. Biologische Beziehungen zwischen Dipteren und Schnecken. Biol. Zbl. 37: 24–43.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1922. Ueber das Vorkommen von Kreuzborstenreihen bei Phoriden. Schr, phys.-ökon. Ges. Königsberg. 63: 130–131.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1923. Typenstudien an Phoriden. Jaarb. natuurh. Genoot. Limburg. (1920–1921): 49–59.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1924 a. Een nieuwe Phoride, Cremersia zikani n.g. n.sp. Natuurh. Maandbl. 13: 32–34.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1924 b. Mitteilungen über allerlei Phoriden. Nr. 9. Natuurh. Maandbl. 13: 148–150.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1925. Trophithauma, eine neue Phoridengattung aus Costa Rica und von den Philippinen. Natuurh. Maandbl. 14: 40.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1926 a. Klassifikation der Phoriden und Gattungsschluessel. Natuurh. Maandbl. 15: 115–116, 128, 140, 151–152.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1926 b. Neue Gattungen und Arten europaeischer Phoriden. Encycl. ent. 2(1925): 73–85.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1927 a. Klassification der Phoriden und Gattungsschluessel. Natuurh. Maandbl. 16: 9–12, 19–28.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1927 b. Revision der Phoridengattungen, mit Beschreibung neuer Gattungen und Arten. Natuurh. Maandbl. 16: 30–40, 45–50, 59–65, 72–79, 92–100, 110–116, 128–132, 142–148, 164, 176.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1929 a. Fascicle 1. Sciadoceridae and Phoridae. Dipt. Patagonia South Chile. 6: 1–42.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1929 b. Revision der Phoriden. F. Dümmler, Bonn & Berlin. 211 pp.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1931. Neue termitophile Dipteren von Buitenzorg, Java. Natuurh. Maandbl. 20: 176.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1933. Zwei neue exotische Phoriden. Natuurh. Maandbl. 22: 34–36, 43, 44.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1934 a. Eine neue parasitische Phoride aus dem Mittelmeergebiet, Microselia rivierae n.g., n.sp. (Dipt.). Brotéria. 3: 10–14.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1934 b. Eine neue Schmarotzerfliege von Camponotus herculeanus in Schlesien, Menozziola camponoti n. sp. Brotéria. 30: 145–148.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1935. Ein neuer Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Paraspiniphora— Arten (Phoridae, Diptera). Brotéria. 31: 155–173.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1937. Phoriden aus Flugzeugen, vom Meeresstrande, aus Pilzen und toten Schnecken. Natuurh. Maandbl. 26: 138–140.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1938. Phoridae. pp. 1–64in Lindner, E. (Ed.), Die Fliegen der palaearktischen Region. Volume 123. E. Schweizerbarťsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1939 a. Neueseeländische Phoriden. Natuurh. Maandbl. 28: 34–37, 55–56, 67–68, 75–76, 86–89, 98–101, 110–116, 124–129.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1939 b. A new species of Phoridae (Diptera) associated with millipedes, from the Yemen. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B). 8: 43–45.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1940. Über einige afrikanische Phoriden. Natuurh. Maandbl. 29: 1–8.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1941 a. Phoridae. pp. 65–128in Lindner, E. (Ed.), Die Fliegen der palaearktischen Region. Volume 141. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1941 b. Über die Larve von Chaetopleurophora pygidialis. Natuurh. Maandbl. 30: 63–66.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1944. Billotia inermis, eine neue Gattung und Art der europaeischen Phoriden. Natuurh. Maandbl. 33: 50–52.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1949. Phoridae. pp. 193–240in Lindner, E. (Ed.), Die Fliegen der palaearktischen Region. Volume 160. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1951. Phoridae. pp. 241–272in Lindner, E. (Ed.), Die Fliegen der palaearktischen Region. Volume 165. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1953 a. Phoridae. pp. 273–320in Lindner, E. (Ed.), Die Fliegen der palaearktischen Region. Volume 171. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1953 b. Ueber die Gattung Plethysmochaeta Schmitz, mit Beschreibung neuer Arten (Diptera, Phoridae). Revue Zool. Bot. afr. 47: 297–310.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1955. Phoridae. pp. 321–386in Lindner, E. (Ed.), Die Fliegen der palaearktischen Region. Volume 180. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. 1958. Zur naeheren Kenntnis von Plethysmochaeta vectabilis (Brues) (Diptera, Phoridae). Studia ent. 1: 259–264.Google Scholar
Schuh, R.T. 1989. Review of “Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Zoogeography of Beetles and Ants”, G.E. Ball (editor). Syst. Zool. 38: 86–87.Google Scholar
Sivinski, J. 1988. Unusual female-aggregated mating systems in phorid flies. J. Insect Behav. 1: 123–128.Google Scholar
Sluys, R. 1989. Rampant parallelism: An appraisal of the use of nonuniversal derived character states in phylogenetic reconstruction. Syst. Zool. 38: 350–370.Google Scholar
Smith, A.G., Hurley, A.M., and Briden, J.C.. 1981. Phanerozoic Paleocontinental Maps. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 102 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, K.G.V. 1956. On the Diptera associated with the stinkhorn (Phallus impudicus Pers.) with notes on other insects and invertebrates found on this fungus. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A). 31: 49–55.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R.E. 1935. Principles of Insect Morphology. McGraw-Hill, New York and London. 667 pp.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R.E. 1947. The insect cranium and the “epicranial suture”. Smithson. misc. Colins. 107: 52 pp.Google Scholar
Soderstrom, T.R., and Calderón, C.E.. 1971. Insect pollination in tropical rain forest grasses. Biotropica. 3: 1–16.Google Scholar
Strobl, G. 1892. Zur Kenntnis und Verbreitung der Phoriden Osterreichs. Ent. Zeitg. 11: 193–204.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.N. 1974. Studies on the nature and function of polygenic loci in Drosophila. II. The subthreshold wing vein pattern revealed in selection experiments. Heredity. 33: 389–401.Google Scholar
Tonnoir, A.L. 1926. A new and primitive subfamily of the Phoridae (Dipt.). Rec. Canterbury Mus. 3: 32–39.Google Scholar
Tuomikowski, R. 1967. Notes on some principles of phylogenetic systematics. Ann. ent. Fennici. 33: 137–147.Google Scholar
Verrall, G.H. 1877. Description of a new genus and species of Phoridae parasitic on ants. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool. 13: 258–260.Google Scholar
Villers, C.J. de. 1789. Caroli Linnaei entomologia, faunae suecicae descriptionibus aucta. Volume 3. Lugduni (=Lyon). 472 pp.Google Scholar
White, A. 1916. The Diptera-Brachycera of Tasmania, Part III. Families Asilidae, Bombyliidae, Empidae, Dolichopodidae and Phoridae. Pap. Proc. roy. Soc. (1915): 148–266.Google Scholar
Whitten, J.M. 1955. A comparative morphological study of the trachéal system in larval Diptera. Part I. Q. Jl. microsc. Sci. 96: 257–278.Google Scholar
Wiley, E.O. 1981. Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. xv + 439 pp.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. 1964. The true army ants of the Indo-Australian area. Pacif. Insects. 6: 427–483.Google Scholar
Wood, J.H. 1908. On the British species of Phora (Part II). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 44: 164–174, 215–218, 253–254.Google Scholar
Yarkulov, F. 1972. Phora holosericea (Diptera, Phoridae), a predator of root aphids. Zool. Zh. 51: 1415–1418.Google Scholar