Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-xwjfq Total loading time: 0.583 Render date: 2023-01-31T03:46:00.941Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

A REVISION OF THE GENERA OF THE SYRPHINI (DIPTERA: SYRPHIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. R. Vockeroth*
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa
Get access

Abstract

A revised generic classification of world Syrphini is proposed. It is based on a study of characters of the adults of 318 described species plus approximately 85 more species as yet either undescribed or unidentified. Thirty-seven genera are recognized; keys to these genera, and to the smaller number of genera known from each of the major zoogeographic regions (except the eastern Palaearctic and Oriental) are presented. Eight new genera, Notosyrphus (South America), Exallandra (Ethiopian Region), Citrogramma (Oriental Region and Australia), Dideomima (Mexico), Hermesomyia (Ecuador), Pseudoscaeva (North and South America), Antillus (Haiti), and Giluwea (New Guinea), and two new subgenera, Melangyna (Austrosyrphus) (Australia and New Zealand) and M. (Melanosyrphus) (New Guinea), are described. Nine new species, in Melangyna (Melanosyrphus), Citrogramma, Hermesomyia, Antillus, and Giluwea, are described. The genus Orphnabaccha is transferred from the tribe Bacchini to the Syrphini, and the genus Toxomerus (including Mesograpta) is referred to the tribe Toxomerini. Maps showing the world distribution of each genus and subgenus, and figures of the male terminalia of the type-species of almost all genera and subgenera, are presented.The peculiar nature of the Neotropical fauna of Syrphini, with almost all species belonging to two large and very diverse genera, is compared with the situation in the rest of the world, where in most major regions the Syrphini consist mostly of a moderate number of medium-sized genera each of which shows much less diversity. Possible reasons for this difference, and for the great preponderance of more primitive Diptera among those with apparent transantarctic relationships, are suggested.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ander, K. 1942. Die Insektenfauna des baltischen Bernsteins nebst damit verknüpften zoogeographischen Problemen. Acta Univ. lund. N. F. (2), 38(4): 183.Google Scholar
Bańkowska, R. 1963. Syrphidae. Klucze Oznacz. Owad. Pol. 27(34): 1236.Google Scholar
Bańkowska, R. 1964. Studien über die paläarktischen Arten der Gattung Sphaerophoria St. Farg. et Serv. (Diptera, Syrphidae). Annls zool., Warsz. 22: 285353.Google Scholar
Bezzi, M. 1915. The Syrphidae of the Ethiopian region. London.Google Scholar
Brauns, A. 1953. Beiträge zur Oekologie und wirtschaftlichen Bedeutung der aphidivoren Syrphidenlarven. Beitr. Ent. 3: 278303.Google Scholar
Brauns, A. 1954. Terricole Dipterenlarven. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Brunetti, E. 1923. The fauna of British India. Diptera. Vol. 3. London.Google Scholar
Chillcott, J. G. 1961. A revision of the Nearctic species of Fannünae (Diptera: Muscidae). Can. Ent. Suppl. 14.Google Scholar
Coe, R. L. 1953. Diptera. Family Syrphidae. Handbk Ident. Br. Insects 10(1): 198.Google Scholar
Coe, R. L. 1957. Didea fuscipes Loew a distinct species (Diptera: Syrphidae). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 26: 2123.Google Scholar
Colless, D. H. 1964. Fossil Diptera and continental drift. Nature, Lond. 204: 402403.Google Scholar
Collin, J. E. 1931. The Oxford University expedition to Greenland, 1928—Diptera (Orthorrhapha Brachycera and Cyclorrhapha) from Greenland. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (10) 7: 6791.Google Scholar
Collin, J. E. 1946. A redescription of Syrphus mecogramma Bigot, and a note on the occurrence of probably the same species in Scotland (Diptera). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 15: 1112.Google Scholar
Collin, J. E. 1952. Syrphus mallinellus sp. n. (Diptera, Syrphidae). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 21: 3536.Google Scholar
Crampton, G. H. 1942. The external morphology of the Diptera. Bull. Conn. St. geol. nat. Hist. Surv. 64: 10165.Google Scholar
Curran, C. H. 1925. Contributions to a monograph of the American Syrphidae from north of Mexico. Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. (1924) 15: 7216.Google Scholar
Curran, C. H. 1928. The Syrphidae of the Malay Peninsula. J. fed. Malay St. Mus. 14: 141324.Google Scholar
Curran, C. H. 1934. The families and genera of North American Diptera. New York.Google Scholar
Curran, C. H. 1938. Records and descriptions of African Syrphidae.—II (Diptera). Am. Mus. Novit. 1010.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. 1834. British Entomology. 18241839. London.Google Scholar
Darlington, P. J. 1957. Zoogeography: the geographical distribution of animals. New York.Google Scholar
Darlington, P. J. 1965. Biogeography of the southern end of the world., Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Dixon, T. J. 1960. Key to and descriptions of the third instar larvae of some species of Syrphidae (Diptera) occurring in Britain. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 112: 345379.Google Scholar
Dušek, J., and Láska, P.. 1959. Beitrag zur Kenntnis einiger unbekannter aphidophager Syrphiden-Larven (Diptera, Syrphidae). Cas. čsl. Spol. ent. 56: 279292.Google Scholar
Dušek, J., and Láska, P.. 1967. Versuch zum Aufbau eines natürlichen Systems mitteleuropäischer Arten der Unterfamilie Syrphinae (Diptera). Acta sci. nat. Brno 1: 349390.Google Scholar
Enderlein, G. 1938. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Syrphiden. Sber. Ges. naturf. Freunde Berl. 1937: 192237.Google Scholar
Essig, E. O. 1953. Some new and noteworthy Aphidae from western and southern South America (Hemiptera-Homoptera). Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 28: 59164.Google Scholar
Fluke, C. L. 1931. Notes on certain Syrphus flies related to Xanthogramma (Diptera, Syrphidae) with descriptions of two new species. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 26: 289309.Google Scholar
Fluke, C. L. 1933. Revision of the Syrphus flies of America north of Mexico. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 28: 63127.Google Scholar
Fluke, C. L. 1935. Revision of the Epistrophe flies of America north of Mexico. Entomologica am. 15: 157.Google Scholar
Fluke, C. L. 1937. New South American Syrphidae (Diptera). Am. Mus. Novit. 941.Google Scholar
Fluke, C. L. 1942. Revision of the Neotropical Syrphini related to Syrphus (Diptera, Syrphidae). Am. Mus. Novit. 1201.Google Scholar
Fluke, C. L. 1950. The male genitalia of Syrphus, Epistrophe and related genera (Diptera, Syrphidae). Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 40: 115148.Google Scholar
Fluke, C. L. 1951a. Corrections to the paper on “The male genitalia of Syrphus, Epistrophe and related genera” (Diptera: Syrphidae). Ent. News 62: 217218.Google Scholar
Fluke, C. L. 1951b. Some new tropical syrphid flies with notes on others. Acta zool. lilloana (1950) 9: 439454.Google Scholar
Fluke, C. L. 1952. The Metasyrphus species of North America (Diptera, Syrphidae). Am. Mus. Novit. 1590.Google Scholar
Fluke, C. L. 1954. Two new North American species of Syrphidae, with notes on Syrphus (Diptera). Am. Mus. Novit. 1690.Google Scholar
Fluke, C. L. 1956. Catalogue of the family Syrphidae in the Neotropical region. Revta bras. Ent. 6: 193268.Google Scholar
Fluke, C. L. 1957. A study of the male genitalia of the Melanostomini (Diptera-Syrphidae). Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 46: 261279.Google Scholar
Freeman, P. 1951. Diptera of Patagonia and South Chile. Part III. Mycetophilidae. London.Google Scholar
Frey, R. 1946. Uebersicht der Gattungen der Syrphiden-Unterfamilie Syrphinae (Syrphinae and Bacchinae). Notul. ent. (1945) 25: 152172.Google Scholar
Gaunitz, S. 1963. Syrphidenstudien. IV (Dipt.). Ent. Tidskr. 84: 260265.Google Scholar
Goffe, E. R. 1943. Matsumura's generic names in the Syrphidae (Diptera). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 79: 202203.Google Scholar
Goffe, E. R. 1944. On subdividing the genus Epistrophe Walker, 1852 (Dipt., Syrphidae), as used by Sack (in Lindner, 1930). Entomologist 77: 135140.Google Scholar
Goffe, E. R. 1952. An outline of a revised classification of the Syrphidae (Diptera) on phylogenetic lines. Trans. Soc. Br. Ent. 11: 97124.Google Scholar
Hardy, G. H. 1934. Notes on Australian Syrphinae (Diptera). proc. R. Soc. Qd 45: 1219.Google Scholar
Hartley, J. C. 1961. A taxonomie account of the larvae of some British Syrphidae. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 136: 505573.Google Scholar
Heiss, Elizabeth M. 1938. A classification of the larvae and puparia of the Syrphidae of Illinois exclusive of aquatic forms. Illinois biol. Monogr. 16(4): 1142.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1960. Die Dipteren-Fauna von Neuseeland als systematisches und tiergeographisches Problem. Beitr. Ent. 20: 221329.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1964. Die Dipteren-Familie Sciadoceridae im Baltischen Bernstein (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha Aschiza). Stuttg. Beitr. Naturk. 127: 310.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1966. Fannia scalaris Fabricius, eine rezente Art im Baltischen Bernstein? Stuttg. Beitr. Naturk. 150: 112.Google Scholar
Hull, F. M. 1943. The genus Mesogramma. Entomologica am. 23: 141.Google Scholar
Hull, F. M. 1945. A revisional study of the fossil Syrphidae. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv. 95: 251355.Google Scholar
Hull, F. M. 1949a. The genus Baccha from the New World. Entomologica am. (1947) 27: 89291.Google Scholar
Hull, F. M. 1949b. The morphology and inter-relationship of the genera of syrphid flies, recent and fossil. Trans, zool. Soc. Lond. 26: 257408.Google Scholar
Kirby, W. F. 1883. Insecta. Zool. Ree. (1882) 19: 244.Google Scholar
Matsumura, S. 1918. New species of the economic Syrphidae of Japan. J. Coll. Agric. Hokkaido imp. Univ. 8: 131.Google Scholar
Matsumura, S., and Adachi, J.. 1917a. Synopsis of the economic Syrphidae of Japan. Pt. II. Ent. Mag., Kyoto 2: 133156.Google Scholar
Matsumura, S., and Adachi, J.. 1917b. Synopsis of the economic Syrphidae of Japan. Pt. III. Ent. Mag., Kyoto 3: 1446.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J. F., and Martin, J. E. H.. 1966. Systematics of Sciadoceridae and relatives with descriptions of two new genera and species from Canadian amber and erection of family Ironomyiidae (Diptera: Phoroidea). Can. Ent. 98: 527544.Google Scholar
Metcalf, C. L. 1913. The Syrphidae of Ohio. Bull. Ohio St. Univ. 17(3).Google Scholar
Metcalf, C. L. 1916. Syrphidae of Maine. Bull. Me agrie. Exp. Stn 253.Google Scholar
Metcalf, C. L. 1917. Syrphidae of Maine—second report. Bull. Me agrie. Exp. Stn 263.Google Scholar
Metcalf, C. L. 1921. The genitalia of male Syrphidae: their morphology, with especial reference to its taxonomic significance. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 14: 169225.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 1921. Material for a monograph on the Diptera fauna of New Zealand: Part II, Family Syrphidae. Trans. N.Z. lnst. 53: 289333.Google Scholar
Ninomiya, E. 1959. Further notes on the immature stages of aphidophagous syrphid flies of Japan. Sci. Bull. Fac. lib. Arts Educ. Nagasaki Univ. 10: 2352.Google Scholar
Paramonov, S. J. 1955. New Zealand Cyrtidae and the problem of the Pacific Island fauna. Pacif. Sci. 9: 1625.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1845. Ordinis dipterorum. Stirps II. Muscidae Rndn. Nuovi Annali Sci. nat. Inst. Bologna (2) 2: 447459.Google Scholar
Sack, P. 1932. Syrphidae. Fliegen palaearkt. Reg. 31: 1451.Google Scholar
Schneider, F. 1953. Syrphus nigritarsis Zett., ein Ei- und Larvenräuber von Melasoma (Chrysom., Col.). Tijdschr. PlZiekt. 59: 192194.Google Scholar
Shannon, R. C. 1927. A review of the South American two-winged flies of the family Syrphidae. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 70(9): 133.Google Scholar
Shiraki, T. 1930. Die Syrphiden des japanischen Kaiserreichs, mit Berücksichtigung benachbarter Gebiete. Mem. Fac. Sci. Agric. Taihoku imp. Univ. 1: i–xx, 1446.Google Scholar
Shiraki, T. 1949. Studies on the Syrphidae. 1. The classification of the subfamilies. Mushi 20: 5971.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1950. History of the fauna of Latin America. Am. Scient. 38: 361389.Google Scholar
Szilady, Z. 1940. Ueber Paläarktische Syrphiden. IV. Annls hist.-nat. Mus. natn. hung. 33: 5470.Google Scholar
Verrall, G. H. 1901. British flies. Vol. 8. London.Google Scholar
Vockeroth, J. R. Diptera of Nepal. Anthomyzidae. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (B). In press.Google Scholar
Westwood, J. O. 1840. Synopsis of the genera of British insects. In An introduction to the modern classification of insects. Vol. 2. London.Google Scholar
Williston, S. W. 1886. Synopsis of the North American Syrphidae. Bull. US. natn. Mus. 31: i–xxx, 1335.Google Scholar
Wirth, W. W., Sedman, Y. S., and Weems, H. V.. 1965. Syrphidae. pp. 557625. In Stone, A. et al. , A catalog of the Diptera of America north of Mexico. Washington.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, E. C. 1948. Insects of Hawaii. Vol. 2. Honolulu.Google Scholar
44
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A REVISION OF THE GENERA OF THE SYRPHINI (DIPTERA: SYRPHIDAE)
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

A REVISION OF THE GENERA OF THE SYRPHINI (DIPTERA: SYRPHIDAE)
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

A REVISION OF THE GENERA OF THE SYRPHINI (DIPTERA: SYRPHIDAE)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *