Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2018
This amphibole is an important constituent of an albite-epidote-actinolite-chlorite-calcite-schist from the summit of Coronet Peak in the Wakatipu district, western Otago. The mineral is somewhat concentrated into folia and porphyroblastie crystals up to 5·0 mm. in length, and is markedly flattened parallel to the orthopinakoid so that sections cut parallel to the schistosity exhibit numerous porphyroblasts, deeply coloured, poorly birefringent, and showing rather poor cleavage lines (fig. 1 A and B; fig. 2 A). In slices cut across the foliation numerous elongated end-sections are to be seen with development of small orthopinakoids (fig. 2 B).
The refractive indices (±0·002) are α 1·635, β 1·650, γ 1·655; γ—α 0·020. The angle γ:c = 18° and 2V 60°±1° Pleochroism follows the scheme α pale yellow, β dirty bluish-green, γ deep bluish-green, with absorption γ > β > α.
page 207 note 1 No. 2718 in the rock section collection, University of Otago.
page 207 note 2 It is interesting to note that cleavage plates of this amphibole give high extinction-angles, very close to the maximum value obtainable in the prismzone.
page 208 note 1 Daly, R. A., On the optical characters of the vertical zone of amphiboles and pyroxenes: and on a new method of determining the extinction angles of these minerals by means of cleavage pieces. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sci., 1899, vol. 34, pp. 311–323; and Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., 1899, vol. 22, pp. 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 208 note 2 Rosenbusch, H. and Wülfing, E A., Mikroskopische Physiographie. 1924, vol. 1, part 1, pp. 490–491.Google Scholar
page 209 note 1 Warren, B. E., The crystal structure and chemical composition of the monoclinic amphiboles. Zeits. Krist., 1930, vol. 72, pp. 493–517. [M.A. 4–278.]Google Scholar
page 210 note 1 Larsen, E. S., The microscopic determination of the nonopaque minerals. Bull. U.S. Geol. Surv., 1921, no. 679, p. 64.Google Scholar
page 210 note 2 Morozewicz, J., Min. Abstr., 1926, vol. 3, pp. 109–110.Google Scholar
page 210 note 3 Murgoci, G., Contributions to the classification of the amphiboles. Bull. Dept. Geol. Univ. Calif., 1906, vol. 4, no. 15, pp. 359–386.Google Scholar
page 210 note 4 Murgoci, G., Sur lee propriétés des amphiboles bleues. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, 1922, vol. 175, pp. 372–374. [M.A. 2–221.]Google Scholar
page 211 note 1 Murgoci, G., Sur la classification des amphiboles bleues et de certains hornblendes. Ibid., pp. 426–429. [M.A. 2–221.]Google Scholar
page 211 note 2 Kunitz, W., Die Isomorphieverhältnisse in der Hornblendegruppe. Neues Jahrb. Min., Abt. A, 1930, Beil.-Bd. 40, pp. 171–250. [M.A. 4–200.]Google Scholar
page 211 note 3 Woyno, T. J., Petrographische Untersuchung der Casannaschiefer des mittleren Bagnetales (Wallis). Neues Jahrb. Min., 1912, Beil.-Bd. 33, pp. 136–207.Google Scholar
page 211 note 4 Turner, F. J., Metamorphism of the Te Anau Series in the region north-west of Lake Wakatipu. Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z., 1935, vol. 65, pp. 329–349.Google Scholar