Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T18:30:36.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Copper–aluminium analogues of hydrohonessite and honessite, and woodwardite relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. Livingstone*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Royal Museum of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EH1 1JF

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bish, D.L. (1980) Bull. Mineral. 103, 170-5.Google Scholar
Bish, D.L. and Livingstone, A. (1981) Mineral Mag. 44, 339-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickel, E.H. (1976) Ibid. 43, 644-7.Google Scholar
Nickel, E.H. and Wildman, J.E. (1981) Ibid. 44, 333-7.Google Scholar
Raade, G., Elliott, C.J., and Din, V.K. (1985) Ibid. 49, 583-90.Google Scholar
Thornber, M.R. (1975) Chem. Geol. 15, 117-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G.V. (1921) The Pb, Zn, Cu and Ni ores of Scotland. Spec. Rep. Miner. Resour., Mem. Geol. Surv. G.B., No. 17.Google Scholar