Skip to main content Accessibility help

Ecological risk assessment of contaminated soil

  • J. M. Weeks (a1) and S. D. W. Comber (a2)


The basis for an ecological risk assessment based on meeting the needs of recent UK and EU legislation is described. The background to the framework and the legislative driver and relevant definitions of harm are provided, prior to an overview of the proposed ecological risk assessment process, which has been broken down into a Tiered approach. Tier 0 requires the establishment of a conceptual site model, where potential contaminant-pathway-receptor linkages are sought and, assuming they are identified, lead on to higher Tier assessments. Tier 1 relies largely on chemical analysis of soil contaminant levels and comparison with soil quality guideline values to assess the likelihood of harm. In some cases biological screening assays may also be undertaken within this Tier. Based on a weight of evidence approach, should data from Tier 1 indicate harm or leave uncertainty, then Tier 2 biological testing is undertaken using assays relevant to the site of interest. In situations where harm is identified under Tier 2 then Tier 3 is reserved for establishing the extent of harm within the ecosystem. Finally the use of the 'weight-of-evidence' approach to generate scientifically robust conclusions regarding the harm (or potential for harm) within the ecosystem is briefly outlined. The framework discussed is currently being adopted by the UK Environment Agency, with implementation expected in 2005. The UK scheme compares favourably with comparative schemes operating in other countries possessing the merits of being iterative, tiered, flexible with agreed exit points subject to satisfying defined criteria and so speeding the decision-making process.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Breure, T. and Peijnenburg, W. (2003) Developments in soil protection in The Netherlands. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 3, 248–249.
Byrns, T. and Crane, M. (2002) Assessing risks to ecosystems from land contamination. R&D technical Report P299. Environment Agency and Sniffer, Bristol, UK.
Chapman, P.M. (1986) Sediment quality criteria from the sediment quality TRIAD: an example. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 5, 957–964.
Chapman, P.M. (1992) Sediment quality triad approach. In: Sediment classification methods compendium. EPA 823-R-92-006, September 1992.
Chapman, P.M., Feiyue, W., Janssen, C.R., Goulet, R.R. and Kamunde, C.N. (2003) Conducting ecological risk assessments of inorganic metals and metalloids: current status. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 9, 641—697.
CIRIA (2002) Biological methods for the assessment of contaminated land — case studies. CIRIA research project 625. CIRIA, London.
CLARINET (2001) Sustainable Management of Contaminated Land. Proceedings of the CLARINET Final Conference, June 2001, Vienna, Austria, Federal Environment Agency, Austria. ISBN 3-85457-594-7.
Crane, M. and Byrns, T. (2002) Ecotoxicological and Biological test methods for the Assessment of Contaminated Land. Environment Agency R&D Technical Report P5-066/TR.
DETR (1995) Department of Environment Transport and the Regions. Contaminated land research report 2, Guidance on preliminary site inspection of contaminated land (two volumes).
DETR (2000a) Department of Environment Transport and the Regions. Contaminated land environmental protection act 1990: Part IIA DETR Circular 02/2000.
DETR (2000b) Department of Environment Transport and the Regions. Guidelines for environmental risk assessment and management. The Stationery Office, London.
EC (2003) European Commission Technical Guidance Document (TGD) on risk assessment of chemical substances following European Regulations ad Directives, 2nd edition. European Chemicals Bureau.
EEA (2001) European Environment Agency report No 22 on late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896—2000. EEA, Copenhagen, 2001.
English Nature (2003) England's best wildlife and geological sites — the condition of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in England in 2003. English Nature.
Environment Agency (2000) Secondary model procedure for the development of appropriate soil sampling strategies for land contamination. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.
Environment Agency (2003) Ecological risk assessment: a public consultation on a framework and methods for assessing harm to ecosystems from contaminants in soil. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.
Environment Agency (2004) Derivation of soil screening values. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.
Ferguson, C., Darmendrail, D., Freier, K., Jensen, B.K., Jensen, J., Kasamas, H., Urzelai, A. and Vegter, J. (editors) (1998) Risk assessment for contaminated sites in Europe. Volume 1. Scientific basis. LQM Press, Nottingham, UK, 165 pp.
Janssen, C.R., Heijerick, D.G., De Schamphelaere, K.A.C. and Allen, H.E. (2003) Environmental risk assessment of metals: tools for incorporating bioavailability. Environment International, 28, 793–800.
Kwan, K.K. and Dutka, B.J. (1992) Evaluation of toxichromotest direct sedimentary toxicity testing procedure and Microtox solid-phase testing procedure. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 49, 656–662.
Kördel, W., Konstantin, T. and Hund-Rinke, K. (2003) Mobility and bioavailability of pollutants: international methods standardization. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 3, 235–236.
OECD (1984) Guideline for the testing of chemicals: 208 Terrestrial plants, Growth Test. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
Ruby, M.V., Davis, A., Schoof, R., Eberle, S. and Sellstone, C.M. (1996) Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a physiologically based extraction test. Environmental Science and Technology, 30, 422–430.
Rutgers, M., Faber, J., Postma, J. and Eijsackers, H. (2000) Site-specific ecological risks: a basic approach to the function-specific assessment of soil pollution. Reports of the Programme on Integrated Soil Research, 28, Programme Bureau Soil Research, Wageningen, Germany.
Smith, R., Pollard, S.J.T., Weeks, J.M. and Nathanail, C.P. (2005) Assessing significant harm to terrestrial ecosystems from contaminated land. Soil Use and Management Journal, special issue on contaminated land (in press).
Suter, G.W. (1993) Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Suter, G.W., Efroymson, R.A., Sample, B.E. and Jones, D.S. (2000) Ecological Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Tessier, A., Campbell, P.G.C. and Bisson, M. (1979) Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of paniculate trace metals. Analytical Chemistry, 51, 844–851.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/ R-95/002F, April 1998.
Van Straalen, N. (2002) Assessment of soil contamination — a functional perspective. Biodegradation, 13, 41–5.
Weeks, J.M., Sorokin, N., Johnson, I.J., Whitehouse, P., Ashton, D., Spurgeon, D.J., Hankard, P., Svendsen, C. and Hart, A. (2004) Biological test methods for contaminated land. Stage 2 — A demonstration of the use of a framework for the ecological risk assessment of land contamination. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Mineralogical Magazine
  • ISSN: 0026-461X
  • EISSN: 1471-8022
  • URL: /core/journals/mineralogical-magazine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed