Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T20:43:17.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies in the system BaO–Al2O3–SiO2 III. The binary system sanbornite–eelsian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

H. C. Lin  and
W. R. Foster
H. C. Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, U.S.A.
W. R. Foster
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The system sanbornite-celsian has been investigated by the quenching method, and the results compared with earlier studies. The system is essentially a simple binary eutectic system with little or no solid solution. The eutectic is located at a composition of 69% sanbornite and 31% celsian (by weight) and at a temperature of 1227±3°C. No evidence for substantial solid solution of celsian in sanbornite, as reported in previous work, was found. Paracelsian, a naturally occurring polymorph of celsian, was not encountered in the study.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 37 , Issue 288 , December 1969 , pp. 459 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Present address: Department of Geology Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

References

Bowen, (N. L.), 1918. Journ. Wash. Acad. Sci. 8, 265.Google Scholar
Douglass, (R. M.), 1958. Amer. Min. 43, 517.Google Scholar
Eskola, (P.), 1922. Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 5, 4, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, (W. R.) and Lin, (H. C.), 1969. Ibid., Schairer volume 267a, p. 134.Google Scholar
Klasens, (H. A.), Hoekstra, (A. H.), and Cox, (A. P. M.), 1957. Journ. Electrochem. Soc. 104, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, (H. C.) and Foster, (W. R.), 1968. Amer. Min. 53, 133.Google Scholar
Roedder, (E. W.), 1951. Amer. Journ. Sci. 249, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, (A. F.), 1932. Amer. Min. 17, 161.Google Scholar
Roth, (R. S.) and Levin, (E. M.), 1959. Journ. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards, 62, 194.Google Scholar
Roy, (R.), 1959. Zeits. Krist. 111, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schairer, (J. F.), 1959. Physicochemical Measurements at High Temperatures, Butterworths Sciem. Pub1., p. 117.Google Scholar
Schreyer, (W.) and Schairer, (J. F.), 1961. Zeits, Krist. 116, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, (R. H.), 1950. Journ. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 33, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Toropov, (N. A.), Galakhov, (F. Ya.), and Bondar, (I. A.)] , 1954. (Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Chem. div.), No. 5, P. 756.Google Scholar
[Toropov, (N. A.), Galakhov, (F. Ya.), and Bondar, (I. A.)] , 1955. Ibid., no. I, p. 1.Google Scholar