Hostname: page-component-588bc86c8c-zwqp5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-11-30T15:19:23.038Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Sons of Soil, Sons of Steel: Autochthony, Descent and the Class Concept in Industrial India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2014

Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle, Germany Email:
South Asia Institute, University of Heidelberg, Germany Email:


Inspired by E. P. Thompson's modelling of class as the contingent outcome of historical processes, this paper explores how autochthony and descent came to inform the boundaries of industrial workforces in the Indian steel towns of Jamshedpur and Rourkela. We suggest that if class is a historical object, then it relates to other forms of power and identity in ways that question the use of rigid analytic typologies. In the private sector Tata company town of Jamshedpur, an industrial working class was constructed during the late colonial period from labour migrants, whose employment became heritable within families. In the public sector Rourkela Steel Plant, founded in the mid-twentieth century, the politics of ethno regionalism coincided with state development policy to inform employment reservation for autochthons. Through a historical analysis of urbanization, migration and employment policy, we consider how elite workforces that bound themselves according to the principles of autochthony and descent were formed in the social laboratories of India's steel towns. We suggest that such processes demand a class concept that engages more subtly with the work of E. P. Thompson.

FORUM: Class Matters: New Ethnographic Perspectives on the Politics of Indian Labour
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


1 Thompson, E. P. (1978b). ‘The Poverty of Theory: or an Orrery of Errors’ in Thompson, E. P.The Poverty of Theory & Other Essays, Merlin, London, pp. 193399Google Scholar.

2 Ibid., p. 212.

3 Ibid., p. 214.

4 Althusser, L. (1970). Reading Capital, Verso Books, London, New York, p. 117Google Scholar; Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy. New Left Books, London, p. 76Google Scholar.

5 Popper, K. R. (1974 [1957]). The Poverty of Historicism, Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar.

6 Thompson, E. P. (1978a). Eighteenth-Century English Society: Class Struggle Without Class?, Social History, 3: 2, 133–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Thompson, E. P. (1991[1980]). The Making of the English Working Class, Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar.

7 See introduction to this volume; cf. Basu, S. (2004). Does Class Matter? Colonial Capital and Workers’ Resistance in Bengal, 1890–1937, Oxford University Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar; Chandavarkar, R. (1997). ‘The making of the working class’: E. P. Thompson and Indian history, History Workshop Journal, 43, 177197CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Sanchez, A. (2012a). Deadwood and Paternalism: Rationalising Casual Labour in an Indian Company Town, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18, 808827CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sanchez, A. (2012b). Questioning Success: Dispossession and the Criminal Entrepreneur in Urban India, Critique of Anthropology, 32:4, 435457CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Strümpell, C. (2014). The politics of dispossession in an Odishan steel town, Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s.), 48:1, 4572CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 See Introduction, this Forum.

10 Cooke, P. (1990). Locality, Structure, and Agency: A Theoretical Analysis, Cultural Anthropology, 5:1, 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Geschiere, P. and Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2000). Capitalism and Autochthony: The Seesaw of Mobility and Belonging, Public Culture, 12:2, 423452CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jackson, S. (2006). Sons of Which Soil? The Language and Politics of Autochthony in Eastern D. R., Congo, African Studies Review, 49:2, 95123CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kruckemeyer, K. (2002). ‘You Get Sawdust in Your Blood’: ‘Local’ Values and the Performance of Community in an Occupational Sport, The Journal of American Folklore, 115: 457458, 301–331Google Scholar; Lambek, M. (2011). Catching the Local, Anthropological Theory, 11:2, 197221CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Weiner, M. (1978). Sons of the Soil: Migration and Ethnic Conflict in India. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar.

12 Nash, J. (1979). We Eat the Mines and the Mines Eat us: Dependency and Exploitation in Bolivian Tin Mines, Columbia University Press, New York, GuildfordGoogle Scholar; Westwood, S. (1984). All day, Every day: Factory and Family in the Making of Women's Lives, Pluto Press, LondonGoogle Scholar; Zonabend, F. (2007). The Nuclear Peninsula, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar.

13 Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (trans.) Richard Nice. Routledge and Keegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar; Carrier, J. G. and Heyman, J. M. C. (1997). Consumption and Political Economy, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 3:2, 355373CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gabriel, Y. and Lang, T. (1995). The Unmanageable Consumer, Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar.

14 Jones, G. S. (1983). Languages of Class: Studies in English working class history, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 90Google Scholar.

15 Bourgois, P. (2003). In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar; Chandavarkar, R. (1994). The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India: Business Strategies and the Working Classes in Bombay, 1900–40, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gooptu, N. (2001). The Politics of the Urban Poor in Early Twentieth-Century India, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wacquant, L. J.D. (2008). Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality, Polity, Cambridge; Malden, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar.

16 Freeman, C. (1998). Femininity and flexible labor: fashioning class through gender on the global assembly line, Critique of Anthropology, 18:3, 245263CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Godelier, M. (1986) The Making of Great Men: Male Domination and Power Among the New Guinea Baruya, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar; Murray-Li, T. (1998). Working separately but eating together: personhood, property, and power in conjugal relations, American Ethnologist 25:4, 675694Google Scholar.

17 Chari, S. (2004). Fraternal Capital: Peasant Workers, Self-Made Men, and Globalization in Provincial India, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar; Goldthorpe, J. H. and Jackson, M. (2007). Intergenerational Class Mobility in Contemporary Britain: Political Concerns and Empirical Findings, British Journal of Sociology, 58:4, 525546CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

18 Ceuppens, B. and Geschiere, P. (2005). Autochthony: Local or Global? New Modes in the Struggle over Citizenship and Belonging in Africa and Europe, Annual Review of Anthropology 34, 385407CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stephen, L. (2002). Zapata Lives! Histories and Cultural Politics in Southern Mexico, University of California Press, BerkeleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Jawaharlal Nehru's own term for the steel mills and dams that were to lead India's march to modern nationhood. cf. Khilnani, S. (1997). The Idea of India. Penguin Books, London, pp. 61106Google Scholar.

20 Parry, J. P. (2003). Nehru's Dream and the Village ‘waiting room’: Long-distance Labour Migrants to a Central Indian Steel Town, Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s.), 37:1–2, 217249CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Parry, J. P. and Strümpell, C. (2008). On the Desecration of Nehru's ‘Temples’: Bhilai and Rourkela Compared, Economic and Political Weekly, 43:19, 4757Google Scholar.

21 Parry, J. P. (1999b). ‘Two Cheers for Reservation: The Satnamis and the Steel Plant’ in Guha, R. and Parry, J. P. Institutions and Inequalities: Essays in Honour of Andre Beteille, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp. 128170Google Scholar.

22 Bagchi, A. K. (1972). Private Investment in India, 1900–1939, Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bagchi, A. K. (1981). ‘Reinforcing and Offsetting Constraints in Indian Industry’ in Bagchi, A. K. and Banerjee, N.Change and Choice in Indian Industry, Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta, pp. 2362Google Scholar; Chatterjee, P. and Sen, A. (1988). ‘Planning and the Political Process in India: Duality and Differentiation’ in Bagchi, A. K.Economy, Society and Polity: Essays in Honour of Professor Bhabatosh Datta, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar; Calcutta, A. (1982). The State, Industrialization and Class Formations in India: a Neo-Marxist Perspective on Colonialism, Underdevelopment and Development, Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar; Zachariah, B. (2005). Developing India: an Intellectual and Social History, c. 1930–50, Oxford University Press, New DelhiCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Jharkhand's formation in 2000 follows 40 years of petitioning from tribal interest groups, who claim the southern areas of Bihar to be a homeland for the autochthonous peoples of the region; mainly those from the Ho, Munda, Santal and Oraon Adivasi communities. However, whilst the state has a tribal population of 26.3 per cent, there is a pronounced lack of integration between the state's urban industrial regions and its poorer rural communities.

24 Bahl, V. (1995). The Making of the Indian Working Class: The Case of the Tata Iron and Steel Co., 1880–1946, Sage Publications, New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar; Fraser, L. (1919). Iron and Steel in India: A Chapter from the Life of Jamshedji N. Tata, The Times Press, BombayGoogle Scholar; Pillai, P. P. (1923). Iron and Steel Production in India, Economica, 7: 5566CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Ibid, p. 144.

26 Gupta, M. and Thavaraj, M. J. K. (1974). Indian Industrial Policy and Economic Power Concentration, Social Scientist, 3:4, pp. 5664CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Slater, G. (1925). The Steel Industry of India, Economica, 13: 6268CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Varshney, R. L. (1964). Government-Business Relations in India, The Business History Review, 38:1, International Government-Business Issue (Spring, 1964), 2257CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wagle, D. M. (1981). Imperial Preference and the Indian Steel Industry, 1924–39, The Economic History Review, New Series, 34:1, 120131Google Scholar.

27 Unsuccessful attempts had been made to establish profitable British iron works at Porto Novo, Madras, intermittently between 1830 and 1874, and in Jerriah, West Bengal, from 1875–1906.

28 Bahl, (1995), The Making of the Indian Working Class, p. 106.

29 Bahl, V. (1982). TISCO Workers’ Struggles: 1920–1928, Social Scientist 10:8, 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Sanchez, A. (2012a), Deadwood and Paternalism, pp. 810–811.

31 Bahl, (1995), The Making of the Indian Working Class.

32 Ibid.,; Bahl (1982), TISCO Workers’ Struggles.

33 Thompson, E. P. (1991[1980]). ‘The Making of the English Working Class’.

34 Keenan, J. L. and Sorsby, L. (1945). A Steel Man in India. London: Victor Gollancz Ltd, p. 33Google Scholar.

35 Pillai, Iron and Steel Production in India, p. 59.

36 Karan, P. P. (1957). Economic Regions of Chota Nagpur, Bihar, India, Economic Geography, 29:3, 216CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Bahl, (1995), The Making of the Indian Working Class, p. 71.

38 Ibid., p. 72.

39 Pillai, Iron and Steel Production in India, p. 59.

41 Fraser, Iron and Steel in India, p. 103.

42 Singh, M. S. (1998). From the Desk of The Labour Association, Tata Workers’ Union, Jamshedpur, p. 31Google Scholar. In a similar vein, the Communist Party of India urged its aligned trade union in Bhilai to abstain from militant action around the Bhilai Steel Plant, which was built with Soviet expertise. See Parry, J. P. (2009). ‘Sociological Marxism’ in Central India: Polanyi, Gramsci, and the Case of the Unions, in Hann, C. and Hart, K.Market and Society: The Great Transformation Today, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, p. 185Google Scholar.

43 Gupta and Thavaraj, Indian Industrial Policy, p. 59; Nomura, C. (2011). Selling steel in the 1920s: TISCO in a period of transition, Indian Economic and Social History Review 48: 83116CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Slater, The Steel Industry of India, p. 62; Varshney, Government-Business Relations, p. 30; Wagle, Imperial Preference, p. 123.

44 Parry and Strümpell, On the Desecration of Nehru's ‘Temples’, p. 47.

46 Sperling, J. B. (1965). Die Rourkela-Deutschen. Probleme der Verhaltensweisen deutscher Techniker auf einer Großbaustelle in Indien, Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, StuttgartGoogle Scholar (English version available as: Sperling, J. B. (1969). The Human Dimension of Technical Assistance: The German Experience of Rourkela India, Cornell University Press, Ithaca)Google Scholar.

47 Payable at RS200, RS400, RS700, or RS900 per acre according to the quality of the land acquired.

48 Ratha, S. N. and Behera, D. K. (1990). Displacement and Rehabilitation: Data from the resettled colonies around the steel plant at Rourkela, Orissa, Man in Asia, 3:1, 1023Google Scholar; Strümpell, C. (in press). ‘The Making and Unmaking of an Adivasi Working Class in Western Orissa’ in Shah, A. and Bates, C.Savage Attack. Tribal Insurgency in South Asia, Social Science Press, DelhiGoogle Scholar.

49 For a detailed account of the merger of eastern and western Odisha, see Pati, B. (1993). Resisting Domination. Peasants, Tribals and the National Movement in Orissa 1920–50, Manohar, DelhiGoogle Scholar.

50 Bailey, F. G. (1959). The Ganatantra Parishad, Economic Weekly 11:4344, 1471Google Scholar.

51 Strümpell, C. (2011). Social Citizenship and Ethnicity around a public sector steel plant in Orissa, India, Citizenship Studies, 15:3–4, 485498CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Bailey, F. G. (1998). The Need for Enemies: A Bestiary of Political Forms. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, p. 31Google Scholar.

53 Sperling, J. B. (1963). Rourkela: Sozio-ökonomische Probleme eines Entwicklungsprojekts. [Rourkela: Socio-economic Problems around a Development Project]. Eichholz Verlag, BonnGoogle Scholar.

54 Ibid., p. 22.

55 Parry and Strümpell, On the Desecration of Nehru's ‘Temples’, p. 48f; Sperling, (1965), Die Rourkela-Deutschen, p. 197.

56 Keenan and Sorsby, A Steel Man in India, p. 33.

57 Keenan and Sorsby, A Steel Man in India, ibid.

58 Bahl, (1995), The Making of the Indian Working Class, p. 100.

59 Ibid., p. 106.

60 Bahl (1982), TISCO Workers’ Struggles, p. 34.

61 Sanchez, A. (2012a), Deadwood and Paternalism, p. 812.

62 Ibid., p. 810.

63 Bahl, (1995), The Making of the Indian Working Class.

64 Ibid., pp. 221–222.

65 Bahl, (1982), TISCO Workers’ Struggles, pp. 34–37.

67 Tata Workers’ Union (2000). 80 Glorious Years of Tata Workers’ Union: Souvenir. Tata Workers’ Union, Jamshedpur, p. 1Google Scholar.

68 Singh, (1998). From the Desk of the Labour Association, p. 31.

69 Bahl, (1995), The Making of the Indian Working Class, p. 144.

70 Tata Workers Union (1978). The Story of Tata Workers’ Union, Tata Workers Union, Jamshedpur, p. 2Google Scholar.

71 Ibid., p. 8.

72 Tata Workers' Union (2000). 80 Glorious Years of Tata Workers' Union, p. 1.

73 Bombay and Madras experienced dozens of organized strikes throughout the 1880s that were led by workers’ committees in the textile industry. Later, in 1895 8,000 weavers in Ahmedabad struck against proposed fortnightly wage payments. See Jha, S. C. (1970). The Indian Trade Union Movement: An Account and An Interpretation, Mukhopadhyay, K. L., Calcutta, p. 82Google Scholar. Formalized unions from this period, including The Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants of India and Burma founded in 1897, the Calcutta Printers Union in 1905 and the Bombay Postal Union in 1907 all predate the Tata Workers’ Union by some few years (ibid: p. 87). During 1918, a flurry of national industrial unrest led to the formation of a number of organizations that would come to form the All India Trade Union Congress. First and foremost the Madras Labour Union was formed in 1918, followed by the Ahmedabad Textile Labour Association in 1920. See Revri, C. (1972). The Indian Trade Union Movement: An Outline History 1880–1947, Orient Longman, New Delhi, pp. 7179Google Scholar. The first meeting of the All India Trade Union Congress (AITUC) was convened in 1920, and at that date claimed to represent 140,000 members from 171 organizations, at a time when the Tata Workers’ Union's predecessor (The Jamshedpur Labour Association) was still only loosely organized. See Jha, The Indian Trade Union Movement, p. 105.

74 Sanchez, A. (forthcoming). Criminal Capital: Violence, Corruption and the Making of Class in an Indian Company Town, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar.

75 Thompson, E. P. (1991[1980]). The Making of the English Working Class.

76 Harriss, J. (1986). The Working Poor and the Labour Aristocracy in a South Indian City: A Descriptive and Analytical Account, Modern Asian Studies, 20:2, 231283CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Hobsbawm, E. J. (1984). Artisan or Labour Aristocrat?, The Economic History Review, New Series, 37:3, 355372CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Holmström, M. (1976). South Indian Factory Workers: Their Life and Their World, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Holmström, M. (1984). Industry and Inequality: The Social Anthropology of Indian Labour, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lenin, V. I. (1996[1917]). Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism: A Popular Outline, Pluto Press, London, Chicago, pp. 78Google Scholar; Moorhouse, H. F. (1978). The Marxist Theory of the Labour Aristocracy, Social History, 3:1, 6182CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moorhouse, H. F. (1981). The Significance of the Labour Aristocracy, Social History, 6:2, 229233CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Parry, J. P. (1999a). Lords of Labour: working and shirking in Bhilai, Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s.), 33:1–2, 107140CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77 Sanchez, (2012b), Questioning Success, p. 444.

78 Chandavarkar, (1997), ‘The Making of the Working Class’, pp. 179–181, 183–184.

79 Sanchez, (2012b), Questioning Success, pp. 441–443.

80 Sanchez, A. (2012a), Deadwood and Paternalism, p. 812.

81 Parry, J. P. (2012). ‘Comparative Reflections on Fieldwork in Urban India: A Personal Account’ in Pardo, I. and Prato, G. B.Anthropology in the City: Methodology and Theory. Ashgate, Farnham, Burlington, pp. 2953Google Scholar; Redfield, R. and Singer, M. B. (1954). ‘The Cultural Role of CitiesEconomic Development and Cultural Change. 3:1, The Role of Cities in Economic Development and Cultural Change, Part 1 (October 1954), pp. 5373CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

82 Parry, (2012), ‘Comparative Reflections’, p. 41.

83 Arnold, D. (1980). Industrial Violence in Colonial India, Comparative studies in Society and History, 22:2, 234255CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bahl (1982), TISCO Workers’ Struggles. Bahl, (1995), The Making of the Indian Working Class; Chakrabarty, D. (1981). Communal Riots and Labour: Bengal's Jute Mill-Hands in the 1890s, Past and Present, 91: 140169CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Chakrabarty, D. (1983). On Deifying and Defying Authority: Managers and Workers in the Jute Mills of Bengal circa 1890–1940, Past and Present, 100: 124146CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chakrabarty, D. (1989). Rethinking Working-class History: Bengal 1890–1940, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar; Chatterjee, P. (2004). The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Political Society in Most of the World, Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar; Chatterjee, P. (2008). Democracy and Economic Transformation in India, Economic and Political Weekly, 43:16, 5362Google Scholar; Chatterjee and Sen, (1988), Planning and the Political Process; Guha, R. (1982). ‘On Some Aspects of the Historiography of Colonial India’ in Guha, R., Subaltern Studies, Vol. I, Delhi, Oxford University Press, pp. 18Google Scholar; Ramaswamy, E. A. (1973). Politics and organised Labor in India, Asian Survey, 13:10, 914928CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Ramaswamy, E. A. (1977). The Worker And His Union: A Study in South India, Allied Publishers, BombayGoogle Scholar; Ramaswamy, E. A. (1983). The Indian Management Dilemma: Economic vs Political Unions, Asian Survey, 23:8, 976990CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ramaswamy, E. A. (1988). Worker Consciousness and Trade Union Response. Oxford University Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar; Sen, A. and Himanshu, (2004a). Poverty and inequality in India—I, Economic and Political Weekly, 39:38, 42474263Google Scholar; Sen, A. and Himanshu, (2004b). Poverty and inequality in India—II: widening disparities during the 1990s, Economic and Political Weekly, 39:39, 43614375Google Scholar.

84 Thompson, (1978b), ‘The Poverty of Theory’, p. 212.

85 Sanchez, A. (2012a), Deadwood and Paternalism, p. 812.

86 Breman, J. (2004). The Making and Unmaking of an Industrial Working Class: Sliding Down the Labour Hierarchy in Ahmedabad, India, Oxford University Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar; Ramaswamy, (1983), The Indian Management Dilemma; Wersch, H. van. (1992). The Bombay Textile Strike, 1982–83, Oxford University Press, BombayGoogle Scholar.

87 Sanchez, A. (2012a), Deadwood and Paternalism, pp. 819–820.

88 Ibid., p. 812.

89 Chari, Fraternal Capital; De Neve, G. (2005). The Everyday Politics of Labour: Working Lives in India's Informal Economy, Social Science Press, DelhiGoogle Scholar; Harriss-White, B. (2003). India Working: Essays on Society and Economy, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar.

90 Parry, (1999b), ‘Two Cheers for Reservation’.

91 Sanchez, A. (2012a), Deadwood and Paternalism, pp. 812–815.