Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:09:50.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ideological Persuasion of Chiang Kai-Shek1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Pichon P. Y. Loh
Affiliation:
Department of History and Political Science, Upsala College, East Orange, New Jersey, 07019.

Extract

In July 1928, upon the termination of the Northern Expedition, Chiang Kai-shek presented a sacrificial message to the departed leader, Sun Yat-sen, whose body reposed in the Pi-yün Temple outside the city of Peking. Sun had committed his life, Chiang declared, to the attainment of eight tasks in the rebuilding of a new China: (1) the explication of the Kuomintang's principles and the expunging of ‘unorthodox views’, (2) the constructing of a unified party through the curbing of individual freedom and the acceptance of party discipline, (3) the transfer of the national capital to Nanking to symbolize a new beginning for the nation, (4) a purposeful change in the ‘heart’ of the citizenry, (5) the psychological, economic, political and social reconstruction of the nation, (6) the disbanding of troops, (7) the termination of civil strife and a total commitment to national defence, and (8) the speedy introduction of local autonomy. These personal commitments—and public admonitions, as they were also meant to be—covered a wide range of national concerns, dealing as they did with ideology and organization, power and legitimacy, political socialization and national integration. It is noteworthy, however, that Chiang at the moment of personal triumph turned his attention above all to the ideological function of the ruling élite in the transitional Chinese society.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Chi kao tsung-li wen (Sacrificial Message to Sun Yatsen)’, 6 July 1928Google Scholar; Chiang tsung-t'ungyen-lun hui-pien (Collected Speeches and Messages of President Chiang) (27 vols.), Taipei: Cheng-chung shu-chü, 19561959, XXIV, 1333–8.Google Scholar

3 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Hsün-lien ti mu-ti yü hsün-lien shih-shih kang-yao (The Objectives of Training and an Outline for Their Implementation)’, 26 and 29 April 1939, op. cit., XIV, 137.Google Scholar

4 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Chung-yung chih yao-chih yü chiang-ling chih chi-pen hsüeh-li (The Essentials of the Doctrine of the Mean and the Fundamental Principles for Military Officers)’, 3 March 1936, op. cit., XII, 294–5.Google Scholar

5 Ibid., p. 295.

6 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Ta hsüeh chih tao: Shang (The Principles of the Great Learning, 1st Lecture)’, 11 September 1934, op. cit., XII, 16.Google ScholarAlso in Chung-cheng, Chiang, Lu-shan hsün-lien chi (Speeches at the Lushan Officers’ Training Corps) (n.p., n.d.), II, 123.Google Scholar

7 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Ke-ming che-hsüeh ti chung-yao (The Importance of Revolutionary Philosophy)’, 23 05 1932, Collected Speeches and Messages, X, 60.Google Scholar

8 Chung-cheng, Chiang, Collected Speeches and Messages, I, 1, gives 1914 as the time when the couplet was written.Google ScholarSsu-ch'eng, Mao, Min-kuo shih-wu-nien i-ch'ien chih Chiang Chieh-shih hsien-sheng (Mr. Chiang Kai-shek, 1887–1926) (Hongkong: Lung-men shu-tien [10 1936], 11 1965), 5th ts'e, p. 3a, gives 20 01 1923, as the date. The latter date is probably correct as Chiang had become somewhat reflective by this time. Chiang was greatly pleased with this couplet; he made frequent reference to it and to the fact that it had been inscribed by Sun Yat-sen.Google Scholar

9 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Che-hsüeh yü chiao-yü tui-yü ch'ing-nien ti kuan-hsi (The Relevance of Philosophy and Education to the Youth)’, 9–10 07 1941, Collected Speeches and Messages, XV, 281.Google Scholar

10 Cf.Nivison, David S., ‘The Problem of “Knowledge” and “Action” in Chinese Thought since Wang Yang-ming’, in Wright, Arthur F., (ed.), Studies in Chinese Thought, Chicago, 1953, pp. 112–45.Google Scholar

11 Cf. de Bary, William Theodore, ‘Chinese Despotism and the Confucian Ideal: A Seventeenth-Century View’, in Fairbank, John K. (ed.), Chinese Thought and Institutions, Chicago, 1957, pp. 163203.Google Scholar

12 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Ch'ing-nien-t'uan kung-tso ken-pen yao-chih (The Fundamentals of the Tasks of the Youth Corps)’, 2 07 1941, Collected Speeches and Messages, XV, 260, 267.Google Scholar

13 Mao, , op. cit., 8th ts'e, p. 80b.Google ScholarChang, H. H., Chiang Kai-shek: Asia's Man of Destiny, New York, 1944, 221, corroborates this list but adds Shih K'o-fa.Google Scholar

14 For the 1924 preface, see Mao, , op. cit., 8th ts'e, pp. 37a40b.Google Scholar

15 ‘Chu-hsi ssu-hsiang shu-yao (A Synopsis of the Chairman's Thought)’, in Wen-i, Teng (ed.), Wei-ta ti Chiang chu-hsi (The Illustrious Chairman Chiang), Shanghai, Kuofan-pu hsin-wen-chü, 1946, p. 187Google Scholar; Wright, Mary C., ‘From Revolution to Restoration: The Transformation of Kuomintang Ideology’, Far Eastern Quarterly, XIV, No. 4 (08 1955), 525, n. 56. For aspects of Chiang's ideological conservatism, see Mrs. Wright's thoughtful article in its entirety.Google Scholar

16 ‘A Synopsis of the Chairman's Thought’, loc. cit., p. 188Google Scholar; Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Chün-shih chiao-yü ti chi-ch'u (The Foundation of Military Education)’, 25 07 1934, Speeches at the Lushan Officers' Training Corps, II, 252.Google Scholar

17 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Wei yu chiao-yü yü ching-chi fang k'o chiu kuo-chia yü min-tsu (Only Through Education and Economic Measures Can the Nation and the People Be Saved)’, in Ch'eng, Chin (ed), Chiang Chung-cheng ch'üan chi (The Complete Works of Chiang Kai-shek), Shanghai, Min-tsu ch'u-pan-she, 06 1937, II, 5th pien, p. 6.Google Scholar Also see Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Chiao-fei ch'eng pai yü kuo-chia ts'un-wang (The Relevance of the Communist Extermination Campaign to the Survival of the Nation)’, 2 10 1933, Collected Speeches and Messages, VI, 89.Google Scholar

18 Chiang, , ‘The Principles of the Great Learning’, loc. cit., p. 16.Google Scholar

19 Mao, , op. cit., 6th ts'e, p. 59b. The lectures were given by Sun from 27 January to 24 August 1924Google Scholar; Yat-sen, Sun, San Min Chu I, trans. by Price, Frank W., Shanghai, China Committee, Institute of Pacific Relations, 1927, pp. 28, 54, 514Google Scholar; Lu, Tsou, Chung-kuo Kuo-min-tang shih-kao (A Draft History of the Kuomintang), Taipei, Shang-wu yin-shu-kuan, 1965, pp. 592–3.Google Scholar Chiang wrote in 1956: ‘After the First National Congress Dr. Sun gave three series of lectures on the Three People's Principles. From March 30 to August 24 1924, he gave a weekly talk at National Chungshan University’; Chung-cheng, Chiang, Soviet Russia in China: A Summing-Up at Seventy, New York, 1957, p. 28. This is an error as the first lecture was given while the First National Congress of the Kuomintang was still in session.Google Scholar

20 Mao, , op. cit., 8th ts'e, pp. 79b81a; 9th ts'e, pp. 1b, 5b, 80a; 10th ts'e, pp. 2b, 37b; 11th ts'e, p. 69a; 12th ts'e, pp. 40b, 42a, 78a, 78b, 82a–b, 91b, 92a; 13th ts'e, pp. 2b, 57b, 58a.Google Scholar

21 Ibid., 15th ts'e, pp. 53b, 81a, 88a; 16th ts'e, pp. 72b, 73a.

22 Ibid., 14th ts'e, pp. 38a, 55b, 70a, 70b, 71a, 72b, 75a; 15th ts'e, pp. 59b, 80a, 88b, 91a; 16th ts'e, pp. 42b, 74b.

23 Chiang's most extensive and most factual statement on the teachings of Sun before the latter's death was his speech on the Double Tenth in 1924; Chiang Chungcheng, ‘San-min-chu-i yü wu-ch’üan hsien-fa ti kai-yao (An Outline of the Three People's Principles and the Five-Power Constitution), 10 October 1924, in Chiang Chieh-shih hsien-sheng yen-shuo chi (Collected Speeches of Mr. Chiang Kai-shek), Canton, P'ing she, 12 1927, I, 291300Google Scholar; extracts in Mao, , op. cit., 8th ts'e, pp. 12a–13b. An example of Chiang's use of Sun's ideology for organizational purposesGoogle Scholar, see Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Tang ping ti i-i (The Meaning of Being a Soldier)’, 30 11 1924, Collected Speeches of Mr. Chiang Kai-shek, I, 321–30Google Scholar; extracts in Mao, , op. cit., 8th ts'e, pp. 57b58b.Google Scholar

24 Chiang's funeral oration on 30 March 1925, contains the following passages: ‘Our Leader Sun Yat-sen was the founding father of the Republic of China. He is dead now…. His illness did not occur suddenly; according to the physicians, he had had the liver disease for several years. The primary reason for his [death from the liver] disease was that he had been greatly depressed by the rebellion of Ch'en Chiung-ming. If we are to fulfill his principles, our first urgent duty is to kill Ch'en Chiung-ming’Google ScholarMao, , op. cit., 9th ts'e, pp. 86b87a.Google Scholar

25 See Chiang's speeches of 27 March and and 7 April 1925, in ibid., 9th ts'e, pp. 77b–79a; 10th ts'e, pp. 3a–4b, 5a–8a.

26 Ibid., 10th ts'e, pp. 13b–14a.

27 Chiang's letter of 14 March 1924, to Liao, in ibid., 6th ts'e, pp. 21b–22a.

28 Liu, F. F., A Military History of Modern China, 1924–1949, Princeton, 1956, pp. 21–2Google Scholar; Chiang, , Soviet Russia in China, pp. 35–6. Chiang is known to have kept a tab on the Communists at WhampoaGoogle Scholar; Snow, Edgar, Random Notes on Red China (1936–1945), Cambridge: Chinese Economic and Political Studies, Harvard University, 1957, p. 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 Mao, , op. cit., 11th ts'e, p. 64a.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., pp. 70b–74a. The citations are from pp. 72a and 73b.

31 Ibid., 10th ts'e, pp. 29a–32b.

32 Ibid., 11th ts'e, pp. 55a–56b.

33 Ibid., 13th ts'e, pp. 3a–16a.

34 Tai Chi-t'ao, ‘Min-sheng che-hsüeh hsi-t'ung-piao (Synopsis of the Philosophy of People's Livelihood)’, with commentaries, in Tai-Chi-t'ao, , Sun Wen chu-i chih che-hsüeh ti chi-chu' (The Philosophical Foundation of the Teachings of Sun Yat-sen), Taipei, Chungyang wen-wu kung-ying-she, 11 1954, pp. 53–6 and attached schema.Google ScholarFor the English translation by Wu, Y. H., entitled ‘Synopsis of Sun Yat-sen's “Three Principles of the People”’, see Chinese Social and Political Science Review, XII, No. 1, (01 1928), p. 58 and attached schema.Google Scholar

35 Tai, , Philosophical Foundation, p. 52Google Scholar; Chi-t'ao, Tai, Kuo-min ke-ming yü Chung-kuo Kuo-min-tang (The National Revolution and the Kuomintang of China), Shanghai, Ta-tung shu-chu, n.d.Google Scholar

36 Yün-han, Li, Ts'ungjung-Kung tao ch'ing-tang (From Kuomintang-Communist Coalition Party Puriflcation), Taipei, Chung-kuo hsüeh-shu chu-tso chiang-chu wei-yüan-hui, 1966, I, 401Google Scholar; Feng-han, Liu, Yü Yu-jen nien-p'u (A Biography of Yü Yu-jen), Taipei, Chuan-chi wen-hsüeh ch'u-pan-she, 1967, pp. 217, 218.Google Scholar

37 Mao, . op. cit., 11th ts'e, p. 59b.Google Scholar

38 Chi-t'ao, Tai, ‘Kao Kuo-min-tang ti t'ung-chih ping kao ch'üan-kuo kuo-min (Declaration to Kuomintang Comrades and All Citizens)’, [1927], in The National Revolution and the Kuomintang of China, pp. 87–8.Google Scholar

39 Mao, , op. cit., 12th ts'e, pp. 11b12a.Google ScholarCf. Sun, , op. cit., pp. 382–3Google Scholar; Tai, , Philosophical Foundation, pp. 1012, 33, 51.Google Scholar

40 Mao, , op. cit., 13th ts'e, p. 46a.Google Scholar

41 Tai, , Philosophical Foundation, pp. 1415; also see pp. 20–1.Google Scholar

42 Mao, , op. cit., 14th ts'e, p. 73a.Google Scholar

43 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Chün-jen ti ching-shen chiao-yü (The Spiritual Education of the Military Personnel’), 14 January 1936Google Scholar, in Chin, , op. cit., II, 6th pien, p. 68.Google Scholar

44 Tai, , Philosophical Foundation, pp. 34–5.Google Scholar

45 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Yao ke-ming pi-hsü chia-ju Chung-kuo Kuo-min-tang (One Must Join the Kuomintang in Order to Be a Revolutionary)’, 19 Jaunuary 1931, in Chin, op. cit., I, 2nd pien, p. 119Google Scholar; Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Chung-kuo chiaoyü ti ssu-hsiang wen-t'i (The Intellectual Problems of Chinese Education)’, 02 1931, Collected Speeches and Messages, X, 1314Google Scholar; Chiang Chung-cheng, ‘San-min-chu-ichi t'i-hsi chi ch'i shih-shih ch'eng-hsü (The Theoretical System of the Three People's Principles and the Order of Its Enforcement)’, 7 May 1939, ibid., II, 150.

46 Chiang, , ‘The Intellectual Problems’, loc. cit., p. 14.Google Scholar

47 Chiang, , ‘The Theoretical System’, loc. cit., facing p. 146.Google Scholar

48 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Kuo-fu i-chiao kai-yao (A Summary of the Teachings of Sun Yat-sen)’, 5th lecture entitled ‘She-hui chien-she yü min-shen che-hsüeh chi yao-i (Social Reconstruction and the Essentials of the Philosophy of People's Livelihood)’, 18 09 1935, Collected Speeches and Messages, II, 133–4.Google Scholar

49 Tai, , Philosophical Foundation, p. 11.Google Scholar

50 Wei-wu, Tsui, ‘The Kuomintang’, Chinese Year Book, 1935–1936, p. 139.Google Scholar

51 This essay also appears in Yat-sen, Sun, Kuo-fu ch'üan-shu (Complete Works of Sun Yat-sen), Taipei, Kuo-fang yen-chiu-yüan, 1960, pp. 286312. John Carter Vincent's report on Tai and Chiang may be of relevance in this connexion: ‘It is understood that Tai sends to Chiang each week at the request of the latter a digest result of his week's perusal of the classics’; Vincent's memorandum to Ambassador Gauss, dated 22 July 1942, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1942, China, p. 218.Google Scholar

52 Yat-sen, Sun, ‘Chün-jen ching-shen chiao-yü (The Spiritual Education of the Military Personnel)’, 01 1922, in Complete Works of Sun, p. 907Google Scholar; Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Chün-jen ching-shen chiao-yü shih-yao (Commentary on the Essentials of Sun's “The Spiritual Education of the Military Personnel”)’, 18 09 1934 Collected Speeches and Messages, XII, 2545.Google Scholar

53 Tuan-sheng, Ch'ien, The Government and Politics of China, Cambridge, Mass., 1950, p. 115.Google Scholar

54 Cf. Sun, , San Min Chu I, 6th lecture on Nationalism, pp. 122–48Google Scholar; Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Chin-te hsiu yeh yü ke-min chih t'u-ching (The Cultivation of Virtue, the Advancement of Learning and the Revolutionary Path)’, 16 03 1933, Collected Speeches and Messages, X, 144–52Google Scholar; Chiang Chung-cheng, ‘Cheng-chih ti tao-li (The Principles of Politics)’, 21 March 1939, ibid., XIV, 69–87.

55 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘On the Birthday Centennial of Dr. Sun Yat-sen’, Central Daily News, 13 11 1965, p. 1, for the English version; and 12 November 1965, p. 1, for the Chinese version.Google Scholar

56 Mao, . op. cit., 5th ts'e, p. 80a–b.Google Scholar

57 Loh, Pichon P. Y., ‘The Politics of Chiang Kai-shek: A Reappraisal’, Journal of Asian Studies, XXV, No. 3 (05 1966), 438–40.Google Scholar

58 China Handbook, 1937–1945, p. 645Google Scholar; Hahn, Emily, The Soong Sisters, Garden City, 1941, pp. 49, 91–5, 104. China Yearbooks give 1901 as her date of birth, which cannot but be an errorGoogle Scholar; see, for instance, China Yearbook, 1964–1965, p. 768.Google Scholar

59 Loh, , op. cit., pp. 443–6.Google Scholar

60 ‘Chiang Chung-cheng hsien-sheng nien-p'u (A Biography of Mr. Chiang Kaishek)’, in Chin, , op. cit., I, 1st pien, p. 81.Google Scholar

61 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Wo-men ti chin-jih (This Day of Ours)’, Sheng pao, 1 December 1927, cited inGoogle Scholaribid., p. 82.

62 li-chin-she, Wen-hua, Chiang wei-yüan-chang chuan (A Biography of Chairman Chiang), Shanghai: Tso-hsin shu-tien, 1937, p. 155, erroneously paginated as 156.Google Scholar

63 Ibid., p. 153.

64 Chiang, Mayling Soong, ‘What Religion Means to Me’, This Is Our China, New York, 1940, p. 558.Google ScholarThis self-portrait was separately published as ‘My Religion’, Shanghai Evening Post and Mercury, 14 May 1934Google Scholar.

65 Chiang, Mayling Soong, ‘What Religion Means to Me,’ loc. cit., p. 161.Google Scholar

66 Foreign Relations of the United States, 1930, II, 52.Google Scholar

67 Victor Keen's bylines in the New York Herald Tribune, clipping in the ‘Chiang Kai-sheks, Religion of’ file in the Library of the Board of Missions of the Methodist Church, N.Y.C.; Tong, Hollington K., Chiang Kai-shek: Soldier and Statesman, Shanghai, 1937, II, 595–7.Google Scholar A Constantinesque story of Chiang's conversion was current at the time: ‘The Generalissimo and his army were trapped near Kaifeng by enemy soldiers. All avenues of escape were closed. Chiang…promised God that if He would deliver them from the enemy, he would accept Christ as Saviour and Lord. A snowstorm suddenly blew up, which slowed the enemy's advance, making possible the coming of his own reinforcements during the next two days.’ Miller, Basil, Generalissimo and Madame Chiang Kai-shek: Christian Liberators of China. Grand Rapid, Michigan, 1943, pp. 88–9.Google Scholar

68 Chiang, Mayling Soong, op. cit., pp. 161–2.Google Scholar

69 Latourette, Kenneth S., World Service: A History of the Foreign Work and World Service of the Young Men's Christian Associations of the United States and Canada, New York, 1957, p. 284. Henry Emerson Fosdick's The Manhood of the Master was published in 1913 by the Association Press and was subsequently translated into Chinese.Google Scholar

70 Stuart, John Leighton, Fifty Years in China: The Memoirs of John Leighton Stuart, New York, 1954, p. 121, citing his own article in Democracy, a Peiping magazine, 15 May 1937.Google Scholar

71 Snow, Edgar, ‘Weak China's Strong Man’, Current History, 01 1934, p. 408.Google Scholar

72 Interview with Professor Ho, Franklin L., 16 October 1967Google Scholar; Chang, Carsun, The Third Force in China, New York, 1952, p. 102.Google Scholar

73 Kuang, Lo, ‘Hsin-ching ch'üan-chi hsü (Preface to the New Testament)’, in Sheng-fen, Ts'ao (ed.), Chiang tsung-t'ung ti sheng-huo yü hsiu-yang (The Life and Spiritual Cultivation of President Chiang) (Commission for the Compilation of Works Relating to President Chiang's Contributions to China and the World, 10 1967), pp. 18–8.Google Scholar

74 Abend, Hewlett, My Life in China, 1926–1941, New York, 1943, p. 234.Google Scholar

75 Ibid., p. 235.

76 General and Kai-shek, Madame Chiang, General Chiang Kai-shek: The Account of the Fortnight in Sian When the Fate of China Hung in the Balance, New York, 1938, pp. 93–4, 169. The biblical citation is from Jerenaiah 31 : 22, according to the Chinese version.Google Scholar

77 Chiang, Kai-shek, My Testimony, Shanghai: Station XMHD, 27 03 1937, pp. 12.Google ScholarThis popular tract also appears in Chinese Opinions on Current Events, No. 40 (31 03 1937), pp. 1517.Google Scholar

78 Thomson, James Claude Jr., ‘Americans as Reformers in Kuomintang China, 1928–37’, doctoral dissertation in History, Harvard University, 04 1961, P. 273, citing from the archives of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (Congregational).Google Scholar

79 Chiang, Kai-shek, Chapters on National Fecundity, Social Welfare, Education, and Health and Happiness, trans. by Chen, Durham S. F., Taipei, China Cultural Service, n.d., p. 90. The Chinese version, entitled Min-sheng-chu-i yü yüeh liang p'ien pu-shu, and dated 11 1953, appears as Volume III of Collected Speeches and Messages.Google Scholar For a study of Chiang's personality see Loh, Pichon P. Y., ‘The Early Chiang Kaishek: A Study of His Personality and Politics, 1887–1924’, Columbia University East Asian Institute, Occasional Paper, forthcoming.Google Scholar

80 Chiang reflected on the question of revolution and ‘religiously oriented faith’ after reading a book on the psychology of revolution on 5 March 1926; Mao, , op. cit., 14th ts'e, p. 71a.Google Scholar

81 Chiang, Kai-shek, ‘The Crusaders of the Twentieth Century’, 31 05 1957 Selected Speeches and Messages in 1957 (n.p., n.d.), p. 22.Google Scholar

82 Kai-shek, Chiang, ‘Christianity's Supreme Rival—Communism: A Sermon for “Christian Herald”’,29 12 1961Google Scholar, Selected Speeches and Messages in 1961, Taipei: Government Information Office, Republic of China, n.d., pp. 8792.Google Scholar

83 Mao, , op. cit., 14th ts'e, p. 14a.Google Scholar

84 Abend, , op. cit., pp. 20–1, 27.Google Scholar

85 Mao, , op. cit., I: 4 ts'e, p. 4b; I: 5 ts'e, p. 2b.Google Scholar

86 Ibid., 2nd ts'e, pp. 85a, 86a.

87 Chiang, , Collected Speeches and Messages, XXIV, 122–8.Google Scholar

88 Ibid., p. 829.

89 Ching-kuo, Chiang, Fu-chang chih-yüan (Carrying a Heavy Burden, Reaching Toward a Distant Goal), Taipei: Kuo-fang-pu yin-chih-ch'ang, 1960, Section 3, p. 3.Google Scholar

90 Snow, , op. cit., p. 408.Google Scholar

91 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Chin-hou chün-shih chiao-yü ti fang-chen (The Policy Line of Military Education Hereafter)’, 23 01 1950, Collected Speeches and Messages, XVIII, 231.Google Scholar

92 Kai-shek, Chiang, ‘Chinese Mohammedans and the War’, 29 07 1939Google Scholar, The Collected Wartime Messages of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek, 1937–1945, New York, 1946, I, 306.Google Scholar

93 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Chieh-chüeh kung-ch'an-chu-issu-hsiang yü fang-fa ti ken- pen wen-t'i (Fundamental Problems concerning the Resolution of Communist Thought and Methodology)’, 10 01 1955, Collected Speeches and Messages, XX, 270, 273–75.Google Scholar

94 Mi, Wu, ‘Confucianism, Christianity, and Modem China’, Chinese Social and Political Science Review, XII, No. 1 (01 1928), 51.Google Scholar

95 Chung-cheng, Chiang, ‘Hsiao-t'i li-t'ien (Model Sons Who Are Dutiful at Home and Industrious in Society)’, 25 December 1934, in Chin, op. cit., II, 5th pien, p. 121. Author's italics.Google Scholar

96 Chung-cheng, Chiang, Chiang Chieh-shih ti ke-ming kung-tso (The Revolutionary Activities of Chiang Kai-shek), Shanghai: T'ai-p'ing-yang shu-tien [1927], I, 4th pien, p. 425.Google ScholarBruno Schwartz of the Associated Press interviewed Chiang and reported as follows: What do you think of Christianity and Missionaries in China, I questioned. Will the Nationalist Government continue to sanction Missionary activities in China, or will they be banned? I have no quarrel with Christianity, said General Chiang, and Missionaries will always be welcome as heretofore. The elimination of missions from China is not part of our program, and they may function in this country without interference as always.Google ScholarHankow Herald, 23 11 1926, in United States National ArchivesGoogle Scholar, Records of the Department of State Relating to Internal Affairs of China, 1910–1929, Washington D.C., 1967, microcopy no. 329, roll no. 56.Google Scholar

97 Chiang, Mayling Soong, ‘Missionaries in China,’ This Is Our China, pp. 297–8.Google Scholar

98 Missionaries and New Life Movement’, Chinese Recorder, LXVI (01 1935), 61–2.Google Scholar

99 Tong, , op. cit., II, 355. For an analysis of the Christian perception of the New Life MovementGoogle Scholar, see Thomson, , op. cit., pp. 283306, 332–42, 408–18.Google Scholar

100 Chiang, Mayling Soong, China Shall Rise Again, New York, 1940, p. 304.Google Scholar

101 Chiang, Mayling Soong, ‘Christianity in an Awakened China’, This Is Our China, pp. 171–9.Google Scholar

102 Latourette, , op. cit., p. 284.Google Scholar

103 Thomson, , op. cit., pp. 291–2, citing YMCA World Service files.Google Scholar

104 Chinese Recorder, LXVII, 10 1936, p. 661.Google Scholar

105 Tang, Christopher, ‘Christianity and the New Life Movement in China’, Doctor of Theology dissertation, San Francisco Theological Seminary, 04 1941, p. 172Google Scholar, citing China Christian Year Book, 1936–1937, p. 77.Google Scholar

106 Kai-shek, Chiang, ‘Appreciation of the Y.M.C.A.’, Collected Wartime Messages, I, 303.Google Scholar