Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Barnes, Tom Lal Das, Krishna Shekhar and Pratap, Surendra 2015. Labour Contractors and Global Production Networks: The Case of India’s Auto Supply Chain. The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 51, Issue. 4, p. 355.

    NADRI, GHULAM A. 2015. Sailors, Zielverkopers, and the Dutch East India Company: The maritime labour market in eighteenth-century Surat. Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 49, Issue. 02, p. 336.

    2013. Temporary Employment. Historical Materialism, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 197.

    Iversen, Vegard and Torsvik, Gaute 2010. Networks, middlemen and other (urban) labour market mysteries. Indian Growth and Development Review, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 62.


Sardars, Jobbers, Kanganies: The Labour Contractor and Indian Economic History*

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 September 2008

A figure in part a foreman, in part a headman, and in part a recruiting contractor, formed an indispensable part of labour organization in mills, mines, ports and plantations in nineteenth-century India, and in the tropical colonies where Indian emigrants went for work. Historians have explained the presence of such a figure by the needs of capital for intermediaries, or needs of labour for familiar relationships in an unfamiliar environment. The significance of the labour agent for economic history, however, seems to go beyond these needs. The universal presence of a worker who embodied a variable blend of roles prompts several larger questions. Was the labour agent an institutional response to an economic problem? Were modern forms of agency rooted in older modes of labour organization? The scholarship discussed the gains for employers. Were there costs too? This paper is a preliminary attempt at framing these larger issues. I suggest here that the agent had roots in the traditional economy, and represented an incorporation of putting out and the authority of the headman inside modern work sites, and that this incorporation of traditional authority in a modern setting gave rise to contradictions.

Corresponding author
Hide All

An earlier version of the paper was presented in a panel titled ‘Colonialism and Labour’ at the 14th International Economic History Congress, Helsinki, August 2006. I thank participants at the panel for a useful discussion. A part of the research was carried out at the International Institute of Social History, Amsterdam, in June 2006, while I was on a fellowship funded by the Indo-Dutch Programme on Alternatives in Development.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Lalita Chakravarty , ‘Emergence of an industrial labour force in a dual economy – British India, 1880–1920’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, Vol. 15 (1978), pp. 249327

M.D. Morris , ‘The recruitment of an industrial labor force in India, with British and American comparisons’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 2 (1960), pp. 305328

D. Mazumdar , ‘Labour supply in early industrialization: The case of the Bombay textile industry’, Economic History Review, Vol. 26 (1973), pp. 477496

Susan Wolcott , ‘Perils of lifetime employment systems: Productivity advance in the Indian and Japanese textile industries, 1920–1938’, Journal of Economic History, Vol. 54 (1994), pp. 307324

Susan Wolcott and Gregory Clark , ‘Why nations fail: Managerial decisions and performance in Indian cotton textiles, 1890–1938’, Journal of Economic History, Vol. 59 (1999), pp. 397423

R.N. Chandavarkar , ‘Industrialization in India before 1947: Conventional approaches and alternative perspectives’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 19 (1985), pp. 623668

Koji Taira , ‘Factory labour and the industrial revolution in Japan’, in K. Yamamura (ed.), The Economic Emergence of Modern Japan (Cambridge, 1997), pp. 239293

S.A. Smith , ‘Workers and supervisors: St Petersburg 1905–1917 and Shanghai 1895–1927’, Past and Present, Vol. 139 (1993), pp. 131177

P. Cloud and D.W. Galenson , ‘Chinese immigration and contract labor in the late nineteenth century’, Explorations in Economic History, Vol. 24 (1987), pp. 2242

N.H. Leff , ‘Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 26 (1978), pp. 661675

Kozo Yamamura , ‘Entreprenuership, ownership, and management in Japan’, in Yamamura, ed., The Economic Emergence of Modern Japan (Cambridge, 1997), pp. 294352

R. Wenzlhuemer , ‘Indian labour immigration and British labour policy in nineteenth-century Ceylon’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 41 (2007), pp. 575602

J. Houbert , ‘Mauritius: Independence and dependence’, Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 19 (1981), pp. 75105

S. Sen , ‘“Without his consent?”: Marriage and women's migration in colonial India’, International Labor and Working-Class History, Vol. 65 (2004), pp. 77104

T. Roy , Traditional Industry in the Economy of Colonial India (Cambridge, 1999), chap. 2

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Modern Asian Studies
  • ISSN: 0026-749X
  • EISSN: 1469-8099
  • URL: /core/journals/modern-asian-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *