Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-kl2l2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-04T16:47:35.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Material Demand Reduction and Closed-Loop Recycling Automotive Aluminium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2018

Philippa Horton ,
Julian Allwood ,
Paul Cassell ,
Christopher Edwards  and
Adrian Tautscher
Philippa Horton*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, UK, CB2 1PZ
Julian Allwood
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, UK, CB2 1PZ
Paul Cassell
Affiliation:
Jaguar Land Rover, Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry, UK, CV3 4LF
Christopher Edwards
Affiliation:
Jaguar Land Rover, Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry, UK, CV3 4LF
Adrian Tautscher
Affiliation:
Jaguar Land Rover, Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry, UK, CV3 4LF
*
*(Email: pmh49@cam.ac.uk)
Get access

Abstract

Environmentally aware automotive manufacturers recycle aluminum production scrap in closed-loop systems to generate environmental and financial savings. Further savings could be gained if material demand is reduced, through improving the material utilization of the production process. Since a more efficient production process generates less scrap, the opportunity for closed loop recycling reduces when material demand reduces. This paper investigates the interaction between material demand reduction and closed loop recycling for an aluminum intensive case-study vehicle. It identifies the greatest environmental and financial savings when both strategies are implemented together. It is shown that a ‘recycled content’ target does not capture these saving opportunities. It is recommended that automotive manufacturers set targets for both material utilization and scrap recovery, to simultaneously promote closed-loop recycling and material demand reduction.

Keywords

RecyclingSustainabilitywaste management

Information

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 3 , Issue 25: Energy and Sustainability , 2018 , pp. 1393 - 1398
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Van Ewijk, S. and Stegemann, J. A., “Limitations of the waste hierarchy for achieving absolute reductions in material throughput,” J. Clean. Prod., (132), 122–128, (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaguar Land Rover, “Jaguar XE celebrates its first year with major recycling milestone,” Newsroom, 2016. http://media.jaguarlandrover.com/news [Accessed: 08-Nov-2017].Google Scholar
ASI“ASI Performance Standard Part I: Principles and Criteria,” Switzerland, (2014).Google Scholar
Horton, P. M. and Allwood, J. M., “Yield improvement opportunities for manufacturing automotive sheet metal components,” J. Mater. Process. Tech., (249), May, (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, J. M., Cullen, J. M., and Milford, R. L., “Options for Achieving a 50 % Cut in Industrial Carbon Emissions by 2050,” Environ. Sci. Technol., (44), 1888–1894, (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daaboul, J., Le Duigou, J., Penciuc, D., and Eynard, B., “An integrated closed-loop product lifecycle management approach for reverse logistics design,” Prod. Plan. Control, 7287, (April), 1–16, (2017).Google Scholar
Atherton, J., International, I., Place, S., and Wc, L., “Life Cycle Management Declaration by the Metals Industry on Recycling Principles,” (12), 59–60, (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar