Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:54:21.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Materials Science of Supported Lipid Membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Supported membranes represent an elegant route to designing well-defined fluid interfaces which mimic many physical-chemical properties of biological membranes. Recent years have witnessed rapid growth in the applications of physical and materials science approaches in understanding and controlling lipid membranes. Applying these approaches is enabling the determination of their structure-dynamics-function relations and allowing the design of membrane-mimetic devices. The collection of articles presented in this issue of MRS Bulletin illustrates the breadth of activity in this growing partnership between materials science and biophysics. Together, these articles highlight some of the key challenges of cellular membranes and exemplify their utility in fundamental biophysical studies and technological applications. The topics covered also confirm the importance of lipid membranes as an exciting example of soft condensed matter. We hope that this issue will serve readers by highlighting the intellectual scope and emerging opportunities in this highly interdisciplinary area of materials research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

References

1Darnell, J., Lodish, H., and Baltimore, D., Molecular Cell Biology (W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1990).Google Scholar
2Deamer, D.W., Origins Life 17 (1986) p.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Lipowsky, R. and Sackmann, E., eds., Structure and Dynamics of Membranes (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1995).Google Scholar
4Simons, K. and Toomre, D., Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1 (2000) p.31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Damjanovich, S., Gaspar, R., and Pieri, C., Q. Rev. Biophys. 30 (1997) p.67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Vereb, G., Szollosi, J., Matko, J., Nagy, P., Farkas, T., Vigh, L., Matyus, L., Waldmann, T.A., and Damjanovich, S., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 (2003) p.8053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Sackmann, E., Science 271 (1996) p.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Tamm, L.K. and McConnell, H.M., Biophys. J. 47 (1985) p.105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Nissen, J., Jacobs, K., and Radler, J.O., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) p.1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Groves, J.T. and Boxer, S.G., Acc. Chem. Res. 35 (3) (2002) p.149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Brian, A.A. and McConnell, H.M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA-Bio. Sci. 81 (1984) p.6159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Grakoui, A., Bromley, S.K., Sumen, C., Davis, M.M., Shaw, A.S., Allen, P.M., and Dustin, M.L., Science 285 (1999) p. 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar