Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T12:23:37.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3D FIB and AFM mapping of Nanoindentation Zones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

T.J. Steer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK
G. Möbus
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK
O. Kraft
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Seestrasse 92, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany
T. Wagner
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Seestrasse 92, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany
B.J. Inkson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK
Get access

Abstract

A novel technique has been developed to examine site-specific, subsurface microstructures in three dimensions. A 3D data set is collected by successive cross-sectional slicing using a gallium focused ion beam (FIB) and imaging using ion-induced secondary electrons, enabling a 3D microstructure map to be generated using computer-based reconstruction techniques. In the first instance, this 3D FIB mapping technique has been applied to copper-based epitaxial metal multilayer coatings which have been deformed by nanoindentation. It is possible to produce 3D profiles of the deformed subsurface interfaces. These individual interface maps allow analysis of the deformation in terms of both the thickness of individual layers and that of the entire film. Material flow, which is seen as pile-up and residual indent zones around the indent, can thus be precisely characterised. The site at which the sectioning is to be carried out can be chosen with high spatial resolution; consequently, nanoscale mechanical properties can be linked directly with an area's microstructure.

In an attempt to examine the errors involved in this 3D mapping method the 3D FIB map of the surface of a residual indent has been compared to an atomic force microscopy (AFM) scan of the same region. The sources and significance of the errors are discussed with reference to ways in which they might be reduced.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. of Mater. Res., 7, 15641583 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Tsui, T.Y., Vlassak, J. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res., 14, 21962203 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Tsui, T.Y., Vlassak, J. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res., 14, 22042209 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Trtik, P., Reeves, C.M. and Bartos, P.J.M., Mater. Struct., 33, 189193 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Saka, H. and Abe, S., J. Elec. Mic., 46, 4557 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Ando, M., Katoh, Y., Tanigawa, H. and Kohyama, A., J. Nucl. Mater., 271, 111114 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Inkson, B.J., Steer, T., Möbus, G. and Wagner, T., J. of Microscopy, 201, in press (2000).Google Scholar
8. Prewett, P.D. and Mair, G.L.R., Focused ion beams from liquid metal ion sources (Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton, 1991).Google Scholar
9. Ishitani, T. and Tsuboi, H., Scanning, 19, 489497 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Inkson, B.J., Wu, H., Steer, T. and Möbus, G., Nanoindentation and Nanotribology II, MRS Proc., 649 (2001).Google Scholar