Hostname: page-component-546b4f848f-zwmfq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-04T17:01:32.545Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English

The Absorption of Diamondoids from Time-dependent Density Functional Calculations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2011

Márton Vörös ,
Tamás Demjén  and
Adam Gali
Márton Vörös
Affiliation:
Department of Atomic Physics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budafokiút 8., H-1111, Budapest, Hungary
Tamás Demjén
Affiliation:
Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Research Institute for Solid State Physics and Optics, Bu-dapest, POB 49, H-1525, Hungary
Adam Gali
Affiliation:
Department of Atomic Physics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budafokiút 8., H-1111, Budapest, Hungary Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Research Institute for Solid State Physics and Optics, Bu-dapest, POB 49, H-1525, Hungary
Get access

Abstract

Diamondoids are small diamond nanocrystals with perfect hydrogenated surfaces. Recent absorption measurements showed that the spectrum of diamondoids exhibit features that are not understood from the theoretical point of view, e.g. optical gaps are only slightly larger than the gap of bulk diamond which runs against the quantum confinement effect. Previous calcula-tions, even beyond standard density functional theory (DFT), failed to obtain the experimental optical gaps (Eg) of diamondoids. We show that all-electron time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations including the PBE0 hybrid functional in the TD-DFT kernel are able to provide quantitatively accurate results. Our calculations demonstrate that Rydberg transitions govern the low energy part of the absorption spectrum, even for relatively large nanodiamonds result-ing in low Eg. Since the optical gap of these diamondoids lies in the ultraviolet spectral re-gion, we investigated whether simple adsorbates of the surface are able to shift the gap towards the infrared region. We found that a double bonded sulfur atom at the surface results in a sub-stantial gap reduction.

Keywords

absorptiondiamondnanostructure
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1370: Symposium YY – Computational Semiconductor Materials Science , 2011 , mrss11-1370-yy02-07
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Brus, L. E., J. Chem. Phys. 80, 4403 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Rohlfing, M. and Louie, S. G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3320 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Vasiliev, I., Öğüt, S. and Chelikowsky, J. R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1813 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Benedict, L. X. et al. , Phys. Rev. B 68, 085310 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Ramos, L. E., Paier, J., Kresse, G., and Bechstedt, F., Phys. Rev. B 78, 195423 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dahl, J. E., Liu, S. G., and Carlson, R. M. K., Science 299, 96 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Landt, L. et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 047402 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Willey, T. M. et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 113401 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Schwertfeger, H., Fokin, A. A., and Schreiner, P. R., Angewandte Chemie International Edi-tion 47, 1022 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Marchand, A. P., Science 299, 52 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Yang, W. L. et al. , Science 316, 1460 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Wang, Y. et al. , Nat. Materials 7, 38 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Romalis, M., Nature 455, 606 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Landt, L. et al. , Phys. Rev. B 80, 205323 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Fokin, A. A. and Schreiner, P. R., Molecular Physics: An International Journal at the Inter-face Between Chemistry and Physics 107, 823 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Perdew, J. P., Ernzerhof, M., and Burke, K., J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9982 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Giannozzi, P. et al. , J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).Google Scholar
18. Vanderbilt, D., Phys. Rev. B 41, 7892 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., and Ernzerhof, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Ahlrichs, R. et al. , Chem. Phys. Lett. 162, 165 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Bauernschmitt, R. and Ahlrichs, R., Chem. Phys. Lett. 256, 454 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Schuchardt, K. L. et al. , J. Chem. Inform. and Modeling 47, 1045 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Raty, J. and Galli, G., J. Electroanal. Chem. 584, 9 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Drummond, N. D., Williamson, A. J., Needs, R. J., and Galli, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 096801 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. We used the 1 s Kohn-Sham levels of C-atoms as reference energy.Google Scholar
26. Raymonda, J. W., J. Chem. Phys. 56, 3912 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Shang, Q. Y. and Bernstein, E. R., The Journal of Chemical Physics 100, 8625 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Geluk, H. W. and Schlatmann, J. L. M. A., Tetrahedron 24, 5361 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Greidanus, J. W. and Schwalm, W. J., Canadian Journal of Chemistry 47, 3715 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Puzder, A., Williamson, A. J., Grossman, J. C., and Galli, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 097401 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Wolkin, M. V. et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 197 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Vöoröos, M., De´ak, P., Frauenheim, T., and Gali, A., The Journal of Chemical Physics 133, 064705 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Falk, K. J. and Steer, R. P., Canadian Journal of Chemistry 66, 575 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar