Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T06:45:43.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Surface Iron on Gate Oxide Integrity and its Removal from Silicon Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Heungsoo Park
Affiliation:
Solid State Electronics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
C. R. Helms
Affiliation:
Solid State Electronics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Daehong Ko
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
M. Tran
Affiliation:
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052-8125
B. B. Triplett
Affiliation:
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052-8125
Get access

Abstract

We found that effective removal of iron from silicon surfaces requires at least three steps (plus rinses), one of which must be an hydrofluoric acid solution. Even for wafers without intentional contamination, the chemical cleans before oxidation can strongly affect the photoconductivity recombination lifetime of the wafers: a very low lifetime for silicon wafers with SC1-last surfaces, a relatively high lifetime for silicon wafers with SC2-last surfaces, and a high lifetime for silicon wafers with HF-last surfaces. We also found that precipitates and stacking-fault like defects caused by iron contamination were formed underneath thermally-grown silicon oxide. We believe that the precipitates were iron silicides formed during the oxidation of iron-contaminated silicon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Rapa, A. C., in “Semiconductor Processing,” edited by Gupta, D. C., ASTM (1984).Google Scholar
[2] Anzai, N., Kureishi, Y., Shimizu, S., and Nitta, T., in Proc. Microcontamination '91 Conf. and Exposition, 75 (1991).Google Scholar
[3] Kniffen, M. L., Beering, T. E., and Helms, C. R., J. Electrochem. Soc. 139, 1195 (1992); composition and other conditions for cleaning solutions used here are specified in this paper.Google Scholar
[4] Pourbaix, M., “Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions,” Pergamon Presss, Oxford (1966).Google Scholar
[5] Atsumi, J., Ohtsuka, S., Munehira, S., and Kajiyama, K., “Semiconductor Cleaning Technology/1989” (Electrochem. Soc., Pennington, 1990)p 59.Google Scholar
[6] Hiratsuka, H., Tanaka, M., Tada, T., Yoshimura, R., and Matsushita, Y., in 11th Workshop on ULSI Ultra Clean Technology, 5 (1991).Google Scholar
[7] Chabal, Y. J., Higashi, G. S., Raghavachari, K., and Burrows, V. A., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 7, 2104 (1989).Google Scholar
[8] Kern, W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 1887 (1990).Google Scholar
[9] Graff, K., in “Aggregation Phenomena of Point Defects in Silicon,”(Electrochem. Soc., Pennington, 1983) p. 121.Google Scholar
[10] Sadamitsu, S., Sasaki, A., Hourai, M., Sumita, S., Fujino, N., and Shiraiwa, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30, 1591 (1991).Google Scholar
[11] Krivanek, O. L. and Maher, D. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 32, 451 (1978).Google Scholar