Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Metal vs. Polymer Electrodes in Organic Devices: Energy Level Alignment, Hole Injection, and Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

N. Koch
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A. Institut f. Physik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, D-10115 Berlin, Germany
B. Nickel
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A.
J. Ghijsen
Affiliation:
H.C.Starck GmbH, c/o Bayer AG Uerdingen, D-47829 Krefeld, Germany
A. Elschner
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Spectroscopie Electronique, Facultés Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
J. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A.
J.-J. Pireaux
Affiliation:
H.C.Starck GmbH, c/o Bayer AG Uerdingen, D-47829 Krefeld, Germany
A. Kahn
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

L We have investigated the electronic, structural, and charge injection properties of interfaces formed between three electroactive conjugated organic materials, i.e., N, N'-bis-(1-naphthyl)-N, N'-diphenyl1-1,1-biphenyl1-4,4'-diamine (á-NPD), pentacene, p-sexiphenyl, and two high work function electrode materials, i.e., gold and the conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS). Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy shows that the hole injection barrier between the three organic materials and PEDOT:PSS is lower by 0.6-1.0 eV as compared to Au, despite a similar work function of the pristine electrode material surfaces (ca. 5 eV). This very large difference is due to an effective change of the metal work function due to the deposition of organic molecules, i.e., a decrease of the Au surface dipole due to adsorption. Accordingly, model device structures built from á-NPD and pentacene on the two different electrode materials show much higher current densities for hole injection from PEDOT:PSS than from Au. Hole injection from Au for á-NPD devices is independent of deposition sequence and substrate. Pentacene devices exhibit significant asymmetries in that respect, due to a strong dependence of the morphology and preferred molecular orientation of the crystalline material on the substrate, as shown by atomic force microscopy and X-ray diffraction. Consequently, great care must be taken when modeling current-voltage characteristics of devices comprised of crystalline organic solids, especially when the influence of film thickness or different substrate materials is to be studied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1. Hill, I. G., Rajagopal, A., Kahn, A., and Hu, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73 (5), 662 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Ishii, H. and Seki, K., IEEE Transactions on Electronic Devices 44, 1295 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Ishii, H., Sugiyama, K., Ito, E., and Seki, K., Adv. Mater. 11 (8), 605 (1999).3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Crispin, X., Geskin, V., Crispin, A., Cornil, J., Lazzaroni, R., Salaneck, W. R., and Bredas, J. L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (27), 8131 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cardona, M. and Ley, L., in Photoemission in Solids I, Topics in Applied Physics, edited by Cardona, M. and Ley, L. (Springer, Berlin, 1978), Vol. 26, pp. 16.Google Scholar
6. van, S. A. Slyke, Chen, C. H., and Tang, C. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 15, 2160 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Halik, Marcus, Klauk, Hagen, Zschieschang, Ute, Kriem, Tarik, Schmid, Günter, Radlik, Wolfgang, and Wussow, Klaus, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 289 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Dimitrakopoulos, C. D. and Malenfant, P. R. L., Adv. Mater. 14 (2), 99 (2002).3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Graupner, W., Grem, G., Meghdadi, F., Paar, Ch., Leising, G., Scherf, U., K. Müllen, Fischer, W., and Stelzer, F., Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals 256, 549 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Koch, N., Pogantsch, A., E. List, J.W., Leising, G., Blyth, R. I. R., Ramsey, M. G., and Netzer, F. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74 (20), 2909 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Gundlach, D. J., Lin, Y. Y., Jackson, T. N., and Schlom, D. G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71 (26), 3853 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Johnson, R.L. and Reichardt, J., Nucl. Instr. Methods 208, 719 (1983).Google Scholar
13. Hill, I. G., Rajagopal, A., and Kahn, A., J. Appl. Phys. 84, 3236 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Koch, N., Kahn, A., Ghijsen, J., Pireaux, J. J., Schwartz, J., Johnson, R. L., and Elschner, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 (1), 70 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Koch, N., Elschner, A., Schwartz, J., and Kahn, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 2281 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Gundlach, D. J., Lin, Y. Y., Jackson, T. N., Nelson, S. F., and Schlom, D. G., IEEE Electron Device Lett. 18 (3), 87 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Casalis, L.,Danisman, M. F., Nickel, B., Bracco, G., Toccoli, T., Iannotta, S., and Scoles, G., Phys. Rev. Lett., in press.Google Scholar
18. Dimitrakopoulos, C. D., Brown, A. R., and Pomp, A., J. Appl. Phys. 80 (4), 2501 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 10 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-xbf5p Total loading time: 0.372 Render date: 2021-01-16T22:28:43.468Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Sat Jan 16 2021 21:52:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Metal vs. Polymer Electrodes in Organic Devices: Energy Level Alignment, Hole Injection, and Structure
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Metal vs. Polymer Electrodes in Organic Devices: Energy Level Alignment, Hole Injection, and Structure
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Metal vs. Polymer Electrodes in Organic Devices: Energy Level Alignment, Hole Injection, and Structure
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *