Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T01:33:37.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Minimizing 1/f Noise in Magnetic Sensors using an AC MEMS Flux Concentrator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Alan Edelstein
Affiliation:
edelstein@arl.army.mil, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, AMSRD-ARL-SE-SS, 2800 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, Maryland, 20783, United States
Greg A. Fischer
Affiliation:
gfischer@arl.army.mil, U.S. Army Research Laboratory
Michael Pedersen
Affiliation:
pedersen@mems-exchange.org, MEMS Exchange
Edmund Nowak
Affiliation:
nowak@udel.edu, University of Delaware, Physics Department
Shu Fan Cheng
Affiliation:
chengs@anvil.nrl.navy.mil, Naval Research Laboratory
Cathy A Nordman
Affiliation:
cathyn@nve.com, NVE Corp.
Get access

Abstract

We are developing a device, the MEMS flux concentrator, that will greatly decrease the effect of 1/f noise in magnetic sensors. It does this by modulating the incoming signal and thus shifting the operating frequency of the sensor. This is accomplished by placing flux concentrators on MEMS structures that oscillate at kHz frequencies. Depending upon the sensor, shifting the operating frequency reduces the 1/f noise by one to three orders of magnitude at one Hz. We have succeeded in fabricating the necessary MEMS structures and observing the desired kHz normal mode resonant frequency. Only microwatts are required to drive the motion. We have used spin valves for our magnetic sensors. The measured field enhancement provided by the flux concentrators agrees to within 3% with the value estimated from finite element calculations. Noise measurements provide strong evidence that the device is likely to reduce the effect of 1/f noise. Flip chip bonding is likely to allow us to fabricate complete, fully functioning sensors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bak, P., How Nature Works. 1999, New York: Copernicus.Google Scholar
2 Giordano, N., Phys. Rev. B 53, 14937 (1996).Google Scholar
3 Podzorov, V. et al. , Phys. Rev. B 61, R3784 (2000).Google Scholar
4 Jiang, L. et al. , Phys. Rev. B 69, 54407 (2004).Google Scholar
5 Smith, N. and Arnett, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 1448 (2001).Google Scholar
6 Tumanski, S., Thin Film Magnetoresistive Sensors. 2001, Bristol, UK: Inst. of Phys.Google Scholar
7 Freitas, P.P. et al. , Sensors and Actuators A81, 2 (2000).Google Scholar
8 Solin, S.A. et al. , Science 289, 1530 (2000).Google Scholar
9 Moodera, J.S. et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3273 (1995).Google Scholar
10 Parkin, S.S.P. et al. , Nature Materials 3, 862 (2004).Google Scholar
11 Yuasa, S. et al. , Nature Materials 3, 868 (2004).Google Scholar
12 Butler, W.H. et al. , Phys. Rev. B 63, 054416 (2001).Google Scholar
13 Veekonk, R.J.M.v.d., , J. et al. , Appl. Phys. 82, 3273 (1997).Google Scholar
14 Anderson, John, private communication.Google Scholar
15 Jander, A., et al. , J. Appl. Phys. 93, 8382 (2003).Google Scholar
16 An earlier version of the device was described previously (Edelstein, A.S. and Fischer, G.A. P., J.A. 91, 7795 (2002)).Google Scholar
17 Edelstein, A.S. et al. in IEEE Sensors 2004. 2004.Google Scholar
18 Dutta, P. and Horn, P.M., Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 407 (1981).Google Scholar
19 Qian, Z., et al. , IEEE Trans. on Magnetics 39, 3322 (2003).Google Scholar
20 Cheng, S.F., et al. , J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 282, 109 (2004).Google Scholar