Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-8c549 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T07:37:06.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Mechanisms of Ductility Enhancement in β+γ′- Ni70Al30 and β+(γ+γ)-Ni50Fe30Al20In Situ Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. Misra ,
R. D. Noebe  and
R. Gibala
A. Misra
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2136
R. D. Noebe
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135.
R. Gibala
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2136
Get access

Abstract

Ductile phase reinforcement is an attractive approach for improving room temperature ductility and toughness of intermetallics. Two alloys of nominal composition (at.%) Ni70Al30 and Ni50Fe30Al20 were directionally solidified to produce quasi-lamellar microstructures. Both alloys exhibit ∼10% tensile ductility at 300 K when the ductile phase is continuous, while the Ni70Al30 alloy has a tensile ductility of ∼4% when the γ′ phase is discontinuous. Observations of slip traces and dislocation substructures indicate that a substantial portion of the ductility enhancement is a result of slip transfer from the ductile phase to the brittle matrix. The details of slip transfer in the two model materials and the effect of the volume fraction and morphology of the ductile phase on the ductility enhancement in the composite are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 273: Symposium Q – Intermetallic Matrix Composites II , 1992 , 205
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Noebe, R.D., Misra, A. and Gibala, R., ISIJ International, 31, 1172 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Noebe, R.D. and Gibala, R., Scripta Met., 20, 1635 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Huang, S.C., Field, R.D. and Krueger, D.D., Met.Trans., 21, 959 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Guha, S., Munroe, P.R. and Baker, I., Mat. Sci. and Eng., A131, 27 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Larsen, M., Misra, A., Hartfield-Wunsch, S., Noebe, R.D. and Gibala, R., in Intermetallic Matrix Composites, edited by Anton, D.L. et al ( Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 194, Pitttsburgh, PA 1990) p. 191.Google Scholar
6. Kim, J.T., Noebe, R.D. and Gibala, R., in Intermetallic Compounds: Structure and Mechanical Properties, edited by Izumi, O. ( Proc. Sixth JIM International Symposium, JIMIS-6, 1991) p. 591.Google Scholar
7. Ashby, M.F., Blunt, F. J. and Bannister, M., Acta Met., 37, 1847 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hingwe, A.K. and Subramanian, K.N., J. Mater. Sci., 10, 183 (1975).Google Scholar
9. Field, R.D., Lahrman, D.F. and Darolia, R., Acta Met., 39, 2951 (1991).Google Scholar