Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:05:18.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patterning and Reactive Ion Etching of Diamond Films using Light Coupling Masks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Patrick W. Leech
Affiliation:
CSIRO Manufacturing and Infrastructure Technology, Clayton, 3169, Victoria, Australia
Geoff K. Reeves
Affiliation:
School of Computer Systems and Electrical Engineering, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia
Anthony S. Holland
Affiliation:
School of Computer Systems and Electrical Engineering, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia
Get access

Abstract

We describe the novel application of light coupling masks (LCM) in the lithographic patterning of fine structures in diamond films. A PDMS mask was used in the exposure of complex patterns of gratings in AZP 1205 resist on a substrate of Al/ diamond. The profiles of these grating patterns were then modified on a localized scale by a process of reflow of the resist. We report on the transfer of the patterns formed in resist by the LCMs into the diamond film using a sputtered Al layer as a mask. The two-stage process comprised etching of the pattern into the Al followed by transfer into the diamond film using CF4/ O2 and CHF3/ O2 gases. The presence of O2 in the CF4/ O2 and CHF3/ O2 gas mixtures produced Al oxides on the surface of the mask. The etch selectivity of the mask was greater in CF4/ O2 than in CHF3/ O2 gases and was only weakly dependent on the concentration of O2 (0-12 sccm).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sullivan, J.P., Friedmann, T.A. and Hjort, K., MRS Bulletin, 26(4), 309 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Adamschik, M., Hinz, M., Maier, C., Diamond Relat. Mater. 10, 722 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Schmid, H., Biebutyck, H., Michekl, B., Martin, O.F.F., and Piller, N.B., J.Vac.Sci.Technol. B 16(6), 3422 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Rogers, J.A., Dobabalapur, A., Bao, Z., and Katz, H.E., Appl. Phys. Letts., 75(7), 1010 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Leech, P.W., Reeves, G.K. and Holland, A.S., J. Materials Science, 36, 3453 (2001).Google Scholar
6. Leech, P.W., Sexton, B., Smith, F. and Marnock, R., Microelectronic Eng., 71, 171 (2004). C. Steinbruchel, Appl. Phys. Letts., 55(19), 1960 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Steinbruchel, C., J.Electrochem.Soc., 130, 1960 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Shan, H., Srinivasan, B.K., Jillie, D.J., Multani, J.S. and Lo, W.J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 141, 2904 (1994).Google Scholar